about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,140 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee and the second variable is Total annual cinema attendance in the UK.  The chart goes from 2001 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee became longer, it created a buzz around the UK, prompting more people to flock to cinemas for an a-word-able experience. This led to an increase in total annual cinema attendance as film fanatics were spellbound by the magic of the silver screen, proving that when it comes to spelling success, the reel winner is always the audience!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a scene with vibrant and rich colors inside a movie theater. On one side, the marquee and walls are adorned with large, intricate letters spelling out previous Scripps National Spelling Bee-winning words. The area is bustling with a crowd of people lined up at the concession stand and chattering excitedly. As the scene progresses to the other side, the complexity of the letters gradually decreases, and the crowd lessens, indicating a transition to simpler, stress-free experiences. The simplicity is reflected in the shorter and less complex letters, and fewer people are shown enjoying the films on the big screen. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Decrease in Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee led to a decrease in Total annual cinema attendance in the UK because the intense brainpower required to spell longer words was a key driver for moviegoers to seek out simpler, stress-relieving entertainment options. With victorious spellers showing off their lexical prowess with shorter words, audiences simply had fewer opportunities for mental escapism at the movies.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism A Discovery magazine cover image Cubism High-tech A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Decrease in Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee led to a decrease in Total annual cinema attendance in the UK because the intense brainpower required to spell longer words was a key driver for moviegoers to seek out simpler, stress-relieving entertainment options. With victorious spellers showing off their lexical prowess with shorter words, audiences simply had fewer opportunities for mental escapism at the movies.
ChatGPT: Imagine a bustling movie theater with colorful posters on the walls and people lining up at the concession stand. On one side, there are big, vibrant letters spelling out long, complex words from previous Scripps National Spelling Bee winning words. As the letters gradually decrease and shorten, the movie theater becomes less crowded, with fewer people enjoying the films on the big screen. The audience's attention shifts from trying to grasp the complexity of longer words to seeking simpler, stress-free experiences, as indicated by the shorter and simpler letters on the other side of the theater.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a bustling movie theater with colorful posters on the walls and people lining up at the concession stand. On one side, there are big, vibrant letters spelling out long, complex words from previous Scripps National Spelling Bee winning words. As the letters gradually decrease and shorten, the movie theater becomes less crowded, with fewer people enjoying the films on the big screen. The audience's attention shifts from trying to grasp the complexity of longer words to seeking simpler, stress-free experiences, as indicated by the shorter and simpler letters on the other side of the theater. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a scene with vibrant and rich colors inside a movie theater. On one side, the marquee and walls are adorned with large, intricate letters spelling out previous Scripps National Spelling Bee-winning words. The area is bustling with a crowd of people lined up at the concession stand and chattering excitedly. As the scene progresses to the other side, the complexity of the letters gradually decreases, and the crowd lessens, indicating a transition to simpler, stress-free experiences. The simplicity is reflected in the shorter and less complex letters, and fewer people are shown enjoying the films on the big screen.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee positively influenced Total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Linguistic Lexicons and Leisure: Linking Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee to Total annual cinema attendance in the UK

The Journal of Verbal Victories and Visual Veracity

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Scripps and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6633634 and p < 0.01 for 2001 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Linguistic Lexicons and Leisure: Linking Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee to Total annual cinema attendance in the UK

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to explore the peculiar connection between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Drawing data from the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Statista, we utilized a rigorous statistical analysis to investigate this seemingly enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6633634 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2001 to 2022. This raises the eyebrow of curiosity and compels us to contemplate the odd yet intriguing influence of spelling prowess on moviegoers. We discuss potential implications and invite further exploration of this curiously whimsical phenomenon. So, grab your popcorn, sit back, and let the letters spell out the tale of cinematic charm!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Linguistic Lexicons and Leisure: Linking Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee to Total annual cinema attendance in the UK

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to explore the peculiar connection between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Drawing data from the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Statista, we utilized a rigorous statistical analysis to investigate this seemingly enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6633634 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2001 to 2022. This raises the eyebrow of curiosity and compels us to contemplate the odd yet intriguing influence of spelling prowess on moviegoers. We discuss potential implications and invite further exploration of this curiously whimsical phenomenon. So, grab your popcorn, sit back, and let the letters spell out the tale of cinematic charm!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of language and leisure has long been a subject of fascination, and the present study delves into an unexpectedly captivating correlation between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and the total annual cinema attendance in the UK. While ostensibly unrelated, the intricate web of language and leisure activities may hold hidden connections that pique our academic curiosity.

In recent years, the Scripps National Spelling Bee has garnered widespread attention, with contestants showcasing their lexical prowess and linguistic finesse. Similarly, the cinema industry in the UK has continued to captivate audiences, offering an array of cinematic experiences. Yet, the notion that these seemingly disparate domains could be connected in a statistically meaningful way may strike some as a whimsical quirk, appealing to the curious and enigmatic nature of academic inquiry.

This study seeks to unravel the threads of this unanticipated correlation employing a meticulous analysis of data from the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Statista. By scrutinizing the winning words and exploring the concurrent movements in UK cinema attendance, a statistically robust relationship has emerged, beckoning us to ponder the uncharted territories of linguistic influence on leisure activities.

The aim of this paper is not only to present the findings of this intriguing correlation but also to propose a challenge to traditional paradigms of linguistic and leisure research. Indeed, the astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.6633634 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2001 to 2022 prompts us to raise an eyebrow of curiosity and invites us to reflect upon the enigmatic interplay between spelling prowess and the allure of the silver screen.

As we embark on this journey of discovery, let us not only embrace the rigorous statistical analyses and scholarly interpretations but also revel in the whimsical charm of this unlikely connection. After all, the letters in the winning word may indeed spell out an unforeseen tale of cinematic fascination, inviting us to contemplate the harmonious dance of language and leisure. So, as we unravel the peculiar correlations and statistical nuances, let us not forget to savor the unexpected and relish the charming serendipity of academic exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Linguistic Lexicons and Leisure: Linking Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee to Total annual cinema attendance in the UK

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to explore the peculiar connection between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Drawing data from the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Statista, we utilized a rigorous statistical analysis to investigate this seemingly enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6633634 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2001 to 2022. This raises the eyebrow of curiosity and compels us to contemplate the odd yet intriguing influence of spelling prowess on moviegoers. We discuss potential implications and invite further exploration of this curiously whimsical phenomenon. So, grab your popcorn, sit back, and let the letters spell out the tale of cinematic charm!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of language and leisure has long been a subject of fascination, and the present study delves into an unexpectedly captivating correlation between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and the total annual cinema attendance in the UK. While ostensibly unrelated, the intricate web of language and leisure activities may hold hidden connections that pique our academic curiosity.
In recent years, the Scripps National Spelling Bee has garnered widespread attention, with contestants showcasing their lexical prowess and linguistic finesse. Similarly, the cinema industry in the UK has continued to captivate audiences, offering an array of cinematic experiences. Yet, the notion that these seemingly disparate domains could be connected in a statistically meaningful way may strike some as a whimsical quirk, appealing to the curious and enigmatic nature of academic inquiry.
This study seeks to unravel the threads of this unanticipated correlation employing a meticulous analysis of data from the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Statista. By scrutinizing the winning words and exploring the concurrent movements in UK cinema attendance, a statistically robust relationship has emerged, beckoning us to ponder the uncharted territories of linguistic influence on leisure activities.
The aim of this paper is not only to present the findings of this intriguing correlation but also to propose a challenge to traditional paradigms of linguistic and leisure research. Indeed, the astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.6633634 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2001 to 2022 prompts us to raise an eyebrow of curiosity and invites us to reflect upon the enigmatic interplay between spelling prowess and the allure of the silver screen.
As we embark on this journey of discovery, let us not only embrace the rigorous statistical analyses and scholarly interpretations but also revel in the whimsical charm of this unlikely connection. After all, the letters in the winning word may indeed spell out an unforeseen tale of cinematic fascination, inviting us to contemplate the harmonious dance of language and leisure. So, as we unravel the peculiar correlations and statistical nuances, let us not forget to savor the unexpected and relish the charming serendipity of academic exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith (2005) analyzes the linguistic nuances of winning words in spelling bees and their potential impact on leisure activities. Doe (2010) explores the cultural implications of language competitions and their unforeseen connections to entertainment preferences. Meanwhile, Jones (2018) delves into the psychological aspects of spelling prowess and its influence on recreational pursuits.

Turning to more tangentially related literature, "The Art of Linguistics" by Lang and "Words That Wow" by Lexi provide insights into the captivating world of language and its potential impact on leisure activities. In a more fictional vein, "The Spellbinding Saga" by Terry Fictionary and "A Wordly Adventure" by Meredith Lexicon offer imaginative takes on the intertwining of language and leisure.

Furthermore, the TV shows "Wordplay Wonders" and "Spelling Sitcom" provide a light-hearted yet informative glimpse into the world of linguistic competitions and their potential influence on leisure choices. Of course, these sources, while entertaining, may not provide the rigorous empirical evidence we seek in understanding the seemingly improbable correlation between the winning word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee and total annual cinema attendance in the UK.

Now that we've waded through the lexical landscape of literature, it's time to embark on our statistically rigorous journey to unravel the curious connection between linguistic lexicons and leisure activities. Let us merrily skip through the pages of data and revel in the unexpected juncture where spelling prowess and silver screen allure intersect.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Scripps and Statista . You used data from 2001 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Linguistic Lexicons and Leisure: Linking Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee to Total annual cinema attendance in the UK

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to explore the peculiar connection between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Drawing data from the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Statista, we utilized a rigorous statistical analysis to investigate this seemingly enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6633634 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2001 to 2022. This raises the eyebrow of curiosity and compels us to contemplate the odd yet intriguing influence of spelling prowess on moviegoers. We discuss potential implications and invite further exploration of this curiously whimsical phenomenon. So, grab your popcorn, sit back, and let the letters spell out the tale of cinematic charm!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of language and leisure has long been a subject of fascination, and the present study delves into an unexpectedly captivating correlation between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and the total annual cinema attendance in the UK. While ostensibly unrelated, the intricate web of language and leisure activities may hold hidden connections that pique our academic curiosity.
In recent years, the Scripps National Spelling Bee has garnered widespread attention, with contestants showcasing their lexical prowess and linguistic finesse. Similarly, the cinema industry in the UK has continued to captivate audiences, offering an array of cinematic experiences. Yet, the notion that these seemingly disparate domains could be connected in a statistically meaningful way may strike some as a whimsical quirk, appealing to the curious and enigmatic nature of academic inquiry.
This study seeks to unravel the threads of this unanticipated correlation employing a meticulous analysis of data from the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Statista. By scrutinizing the winning words and exploring the concurrent movements in UK cinema attendance, a statistically robust relationship has emerged, beckoning us to ponder the uncharted territories of linguistic influence on leisure activities.
The aim of this paper is not only to present the findings of this intriguing correlation but also to propose a challenge to traditional paradigms of linguistic and leisure research. Indeed, the astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.6633634 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2001 to 2022 prompts us to raise an eyebrow of curiosity and invites us to reflect upon the enigmatic interplay between spelling prowess and the allure of the silver screen.
As we embark on this journey of discovery, let us not only embrace the rigorous statistical analyses and scholarly interpretations but also revel in the whimsical charm of this unlikely connection. After all, the letters in the winning word may indeed spell out an unforeseen tale of cinematic fascination, inviting us to contemplate the harmonious dance of language and leisure. So, as we unravel the peculiar correlations and statistical nuances, let us not forget to savor the unexpected and relish the charming serendipity of academic exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To disentangle the mystical relationship between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and total annual cinema attendance in the UK, we employed a whimsically convoluted methodological framework. Our data compilation chiefly relied on the official records of the Scripps National Spelling Bee and the comprehensive statistics provided by Statista.

The first step of our research involved meticulously cataloging the winning words from each year of the Spelling Bee competition, meticulously noting every consonant and vowel to capture the nuances of linguistic composition. This meticulous approach ensured that no letter was left unturned in our quest to decipher the enigmatic influence of lexical prowess on leisure activities.

Subsequently, we whimsically combed through the historical archives of UK cinema attendance, playfully navigating through the intricacies of cinematic records to capture the ebbs and flows of audience enchantment. It's worth noting that our exploration of these datasets involved an appreciable amount of popcorn consumption to fuel our cognitive processes, underscoring the dedication of the research team to embrace the holistic essence of the study.

To unveil the statistically robust relationship between the letters in the winning word and the captivating allure of the silver screen, we mirthfully employed correlation analyses, delving into the delightful realm of statistical interpretations. Our analysis, conducted with steadfast mirth, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6633634 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2001 to 2022, evoking a notable sense of analytic astonishment.

In addition, we merrily utilized regression models to frolic through the intricate dance of predictive analyses, seeking to encapsulate the whimsical nuances of lexical influence on cinematic trends. This entailed teasing out the potential predictive power of the winning word in unraveling the enigmatic variances in UK cinema attendance, adding a playful blend of anticipation to our rigorous analyses.

Furthermore, we wove a tapestry of fact-based storytelling using data visualization techniques, playfully crafting graphical representations that intertwined the artistry of statistical elegance with the peculiar charm of linguistic influence on leisurely pursuits. Our graphical escapades artfully painted a portrait of the uncanny relationship between spelling finesse and the allure of the cinematic experience.

Lastly, to account for the subtle anthropological and psychological undercurrents, we jestedly conducted qualitative interviews with select individuals, eliciting their spontaneous reactions to winning words and their cinematic excursions. This playful endeavor aimed to capture the ineffable essence of linguistic enchantment and its whimsical influence on leisurely pastimes.

In sum, our methodological journey mirrored the quirky confluence of statistical sophistication and whimsical fascination, reflecting the mirthful spirit of academic inquiry as we endeavored to unveil the surprising correlation between the letters in the winning word and the delightful enchantment of the silver screen.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Scripps and Statista .

For the time period 2001 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6633634, r-squared of 0.4400511, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Linguistic Lexicons and Leisure: Linking Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee to Total annual cinema attendance in the UK

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to explore the peculiar connection between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Drawing data from the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Statista, we utilized a rigorous statistical analysis to investigate this seemingly enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6633634 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2001 to 2022. This raises the eyebrow of curiosity and compels us to contemplate the odd yet intriguing influence of spelling prowess on moviegoers. We discuss potential implications and invite further exploration of this curiously whimsical phenomenon. So, grab your popcorn, sit back, and let the letters spell out the tale of cinematic charm!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of language and leisure has long been a subject of fascination, and the present study delves into an unexpectedly captivating correlation between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and the total annual cinema attendance in the UK. While ostensibly unrelated, the intricate web of language and leisure activities may hold hidden connections that pique our academic curiosity.
In recent years, the Scripps National Spelling Bee has garnered widespread attention, with contestants showcasing their lexical prowess and linguistic finesse. Similarly, the cinema industry in the UK has continued to captivate audiences, offering an array of cinematic experiences. Yet, the notion that these seemingly disparate domains could be connected in a statistically meaningful way may strike some as a whimsical quirk, appealing to the curious and enigmatic nature of academic inquiry.
This study seeks to unravel the threads of this unanticipated correlation employing a meticulous analysis of data from the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Statista. By scrutinizing the winning words and exploring the concurrent movements in UK cinema attendance, a statistically robust relationship has emerged, beckoning us to ponder the uncharted territories of linguistic influence on leisure activities.
The aim of this paper is not only to present the findings of this intriguing correlation but also to propose a challenge to traditional paradigms of linguistic and leisure research. Indeed, the astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.6633634 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2001 to 2022 prompts us to raise an eyebrow of curiosity and invites us to reflect upon the enigmatic interplay between spelling prowess and the allure of the silver screen.
As we embark on this journey of discovery, let us not only embrace the rigorous statistical analyses and scholarly interpretations but also revel in the whimsical charm of this unlikely connection. After all, the letters in the winning word may indeed spell out an unforeseen tale of cinematic fascination, inviting us to contemplate the harmonious dance of language and leisure. So, as we unravel the peculiar correlations and statistical nuances, let us not forget to savor the unexpected and relish the charming serendipity of academic exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The investigation into the relationship between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and total annual cinema attendance in the UK yielded intriguing results. Our analysis uncovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.6633634, a substantial r-squared value of 0.4400511, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the examined period from 2001 to 2022. These statistical findings suggest a robust and significant association between the linguistic prowess displayed at the spelling bee and the cinematic preferences of audiences across the pond.

Fig. 1 presents a visual representation of the pronounced correlation, with a scatterplot revealing a striking pattern that warrants attention and raises intriguing questions. Depicted in this figure, the strong relationship between the variables prompts one to ponder the potential influence of spelling skills on movie choices or the persuasive power of letters in capturing the imagination of cinema-goers.

It is essential to note the caveats inherent in correlational analyses, as the observed relationship does not imply causation or establish a direct link between specific words and movie attendance. Nonetheless, the robustness of the correlation underscores the need for further exploration and consideration of potentially overlooked factors influencing leisure choices.

The unexpected nature of this correlation piques our intellectual curiosity and prompts contemplation of the interplay between linguistic artistry and the allure of the silver screen. While the statistical outcomes are compelling, they also open the door to a realm of playful speculation and academic whimsy. The incongruity of the connection may well elicit a wry smile or playful quip, emphasizing the delightful serendipity often found in the pursuit of knowledge.

In light of these findings, the complex tapestry of language and leisure invites us to appreciate the harmonious dance of statistical scrutiny and the enchanting unpredictability of academic investigation. This whimsical correlation encourages us to savor the unexpected and embrace the scholarly intrigue that lies within seemingly unrelated domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Linguistic Lexicons and Leisure: Linking Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee to Total annual cinema attendance in the UK

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to explore the peculiar connection between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Drawing data from the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Statista, we utilized a rigorous statistical analysis to investigate this seemingly enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6633634 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2001 to 2022. This raises the eyebrow of curiosity and compels us to contemplate the odd yet intriguing influence of spelling prowess on moviegoers. We discuss potential implications and invite further exploration of this curiously whimsical phenomenon. So, grab your popcorn, sit back, and let the letters spell out the tale of cinematic charm!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith (2005) analyzes the linguistic nuances of winning words in spelling bees and their potential impact on leisure activities. Doe (2010) explores the cultural implications of language competitions and their unforeseen connections to entertainment preferences. Meanwhile, Jones (2018) delves into the psychological aspects of spelling prowess and its influence on recreational pursuits.
Turning to more tangentially related literature, "The Art of Linguistics" by Lang and "Words That Wow" by Lexi provide insights into the captivating world of language and its potential impact on leisure activities. In a more fictional vein, "The Spellbinding Saga" by Terry Fictionary and "A Wordly Adventure" by Meredith Lexicon offer imaginative takes on the intertwining of language and leisure.
Furthermore, the TV shows "Wordplay Wonders" and "Spelling Sitcom" provide a light-hearted yet informative glimpse into the world of linguistic competitions and their potential influence on leisure choices. Of course, these sources, while entertaining, may not provide the rigorous empirical evidence we seek in understanding the seemingly improbable correlation between the winning word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee and total annual cinema attendance in the UK.
Now that we've waded through the lexical landscape of literature, it's time to embark on our statistically rigorous journey to unravel the curious connection between linguistic lexicons and leisure activities. Let us merrily skip through the pages of data and revel in the unexpected juncture where spelling prowess and silver screen allure intersect.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the relationship between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and total annual cinema attendance in the UK yielded intriguing results. Our analysis uncovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.6633634, a substantial r-squared value of 0.4400511, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the examined period from 2001 to 2022. These statistical findings suggest a robust and significant association between the linguistic prowess displayed at the spelling bee and the cinematic preferences of audiences across the pond.
Fig. 1 presents a visual representation of the pronounced correlation, with a scatterplot revealing a striking pattern that warrants attention and raises intriguing questions. Depicted in this figure, the strong relationship between the variables prompts one to ponder the potential influence of spelling skills on movie choices or the persuasive power of letters in capturing the imagination of cinema-goers.
It is essential to note the caveats inherent in correlational analyses, as the observed relationship does not imply causation or establish a direct link between specific words and movie attendance. Nonetheless, the robustness of the correlation underscores the need for further exploration and consideration of potentially overlooked factors influencing leisure choices.
The unexpected nature of this correlation piques our intellectual curiosity and prompts contemplation of the interplay between linguistic artistry and the allure of the silver screen. While the statistical outcomes are compelling, they also open the door to a realm of playful speculation and academic whimsy. The incongruity of the connection may well elicit a wry smile or playful quip, emphasizing the delightful serendipity often found in the pursuit of knowledge.
In light of these findings, the complex tapestry of language and leisure invites us to appreciate the harmonious dance of statistical scrutiny and the enchanting unpredictability of academic investigation. This whimsical correlation encourages us to savor the unexpected and embrace the scholarly intrigue that lies within seemingly unrelated domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.6633634 and the noteworthy r-squared value of 0.4400511, coupled with the p-value of less than 0.01, bear testament to the robust and significant association between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and total annual cinema attendance in the UK. As we dig into the compelling intricacies of our findings, it becomes evident that the unexpected juncture where spelling prowess and silver screen allure intersect is not to be taken lightly.

Our results align with prior research, such as the whimsical work of Terry Fictionary in "The Spellbinding Saga," whose playful narrative unwittingly fosters acumen in understanding the curious influence of linguistic prowess on leisure pursuits. Likewise, the TV show "Spelling Sitcom" light-heartedly sidestepped the empirical evidence we sought, yet its mirthful depiction of linguistic competitions subtly hints at the underlying link between language and leisure, a notion echoed in our statistical revelation.

The striking pattern depicted in Fig. 1, with a scatterplot revealing the gripping relationship between the variables, evinces the potential influence of spelling skills on movie choices or the captivating pull of letters in capturing the imagination of cinema-goers. While we must be cautious in inferring causation based on correlational analyses, the pronounced correlation emphasizes the need for further exploration and consideration of hitherto overlooked factors influencing leisure choices. This whimsical correlation beckons us to revel in the unexpected and savor the engaging intrigue it presents, adding a touch of delightful serendipity to the scholarly pursuit of knowledge.

Our results contribute to the broader discourse on the serendipity often found in scholarly investigation, highlighting the enchanting unpredictability inherent in the pursuit of knowledge. The whimsical nature of this correlation inspires scholarly mirth and invites us to ponder the harmonious dance of statistical scrutiny and the captivating allure of academic investigation. Thus, as we unravel the ties that bind spelling prowess and cinematic preferences, we are compelled to view this seemingly improbable connection through the lens of academic whimsy, savoring the unexpected and relishing the intellectual conundrum it presents.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Linguistic Lexicons and Leisure: Linking Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee to Total annual cinema attendance in the UK

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to explore the peculiar connection between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Drawing data from the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Statista, we utilized a rigorous statistical analysis to investigate this seemingly enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6633634 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2001 to 2022. This raises the eyebrow of curiosity and compels us to contemplate the odd yet intriguing influence of spelling prowess on moviegoers. We discuss potential implications and invite further exploration of this curiously whimsical phenomenon. So, grab your popcorn, sit back, and let the letters spell out the tale of cinematic charm!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of language and leisure has long been a subject of fascination, and the present study delves into an unexpectedly captivating correlation between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and the total annual cinema attendance in the UK. While ostensibly unrelated, the intricate web of language and leisure activities may hold hidden connections that pique our academic curiosity.
In recent years, the Scripps National Spelling Bee has garnered widespread attention, with contestants showcasing their lexical prowess and linguistic finesse. Similarly, the cinema industry in the UK has continued to captivate audiences, offering an array of cinematic experiences. Yet, the notion that these seemingly disparate domains could be connected in a statistically meaningful way may strike some as a whimsical quirk, appealing to the curious and enigmatic nature of academic inquiry.
This study seeks to unravel the threads of this unanticipated correlation employing a meticulous analysis of data from the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Statista. By scrutinizing the winning words and exploring the concurrent movements in UK cinema attendance, a statistically robust relationship has emerged, beckoning us to ponder the uncharted territories of linguistic influence on leisure activities.
The aim of this paper is not only to present the findings of this intriguing correlation but also to propose a challenge to traditional paradigms of linguistic and leisure research. Indeed, the astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.6633634 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2001 to 2022 prompts us to raise an eyebrow of curiosity and invites us to reflect upon the enigmatic interplay between spelling prowess and the allure of the silver screen.
As we embark on this journey of discovery, let us not only embrace the rigorous statistical analyses and scholarly interpretations but also revel in the whimsical charm of this unlikely connection. After all, the letters in the winning word may indeed spell out an unforeseen tale of cinematic fascination, inviting us to contemplate the harmonious dance of language and leisure. So, as we unravel the peculiar correlations and statistical nuances, let us not forget to savor the unexpected and relish the charming serendipity of academic exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the relationship between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and total annual cinema attendance in the UK yielded intriguing results. Our analysis uncovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.6633634, a substantial r-squared value of 0.4400511, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the examined period from 2001 to 2022. These statistical findings suggest a robust and significant association between the linguistic prowess displayed at the spelling bee and the cinematic preferences of audiences across the pond.
Fig. 1 presents a visual representation of the pronounced correlation, with a scatterplot revealing a striking pattern that warrants attention and raises intriguing questions. Depicted in this figure, the strong relationship between the variables prompts one to ponder the potential influence of spelling skills on movie choices or the persuasive power of letters in capturing the imagination of cinema-goers.
It is essential to note the caveats inherent in correlational analyses, as the observed relationship does not imply causation or establish a direct link between specific words and movie attendance. Nonetheless, the robustness of the correlation underscores the need for further exploration and consideration of potentially overlooked factors influencing leisure choices.
The unexpected nature of this correlation piques our intellectual curiosity and prompts contemplation of the interplay between linguistic artistry and the allure of the silver screen. While the statistical outcomes are compelling, they also open the door to a realm of playful speculation and academic whimsy. The incongruity of the connection may well elicit a wry smile or playful quip, emphasizing the delightful serendipity often found in the pursuit of knowledge.
In light of these findings, the complex tapestry of language and leisure invites us to appreciate the harmonious dance of statistical scrutiny and the enchanting unpredictability of academic investigation. This whimsical correlation encourages us to savor the unexpected and embrace the scholarly intrigue that lies within seemingly unrelated domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the revelation of a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.6633634 and a p-value of less than 0.01 between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and total annual cinema attendance in the UK has left us spellbound, if you'll pardon the pun. The statistically significant association uncovered in our analysis compels us to contemplate the intriguing influence of linguistic finesse on the leisurely pursuits of moviegoers. While we must exercise caution in attributing causality, the whimsical nature of this connection prompts us to consider the enchanting interplay between linguistic artistry and the allure of the silver screen.

The unexpected convergence of these seemingly disparate realms brings to mind the delightfully capricious nature of academic inquiry, where scholarly rigor encounters the whimsy of statistical serendipity. Our findings underscore the need for continued exploration into the uncharted territories of language-entertainment dynamics. However, it's perhaps best to enjoy this correlation as a moment of academic merriment and refrain from overly serious conjecture. After all, who would have thought that the letters in a winning word could cast such a spell over cinema attendance?

As we bid adieu to this curious correlation, it is our scholarly duty to acknowledge that further research in this area may well be an exercise in flogging a deceased equine, if you'll pardon the pun once more. The intersection of language and leisure has yielded a treasure trove of unexpected curiosities, and while we revel in the whimsicality of this unlikely correlation, it's time to focus our scholarly efforts on more pressing enigmas. It's been a delightful and surprising journey, but in the spirit of academic wisdom, we assert that no more research is needed in this area, at least for now.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Linguistic Lexicons and Leisure: Linking Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee to Total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Verbal Victories and Visual Veracity


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Linguistic Lexicons and Leisure: Linking Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee to Total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Linguistic Leisure Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Linguistic Lexicons and Leisure: Linking Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee to Total annual cinema attendance in the UK with an abstract of This study aimed to explore the peculiar connection between the letters in the winning word at the Scripps National Spelling Bee and total annual cinema attendance in the UK. Drawing data from the Scripps National Spelling Bee and Statista, we utilized a rigorous statistical analysis to investigate this seemingly enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6633634 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2001 to 2022. This raises the eyebrow of curiosity and compels us to contemplate the odd yet intriguing influence of spelling prowess on moviegoers. We discuss potential implications and invite further exploration of this curiously whimsical phenomenon. So, grab your popcorn, sit back, and let the letters spell out the tale of cinematic charm!

ChatGPT:

linguistic lexicons, leisure, winning word, Scripps National Spelling Bee, annual cinema attendance, UK, correlation analysis, statistical analysis, spelling prowess, moviegoers, cinematic charm, entertainment trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee
Detailed data title: Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee (longest if multiple)
Source: Scripps
See what else correlates with Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee

Total annual cinema attendance in the UK
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Total annual cinema attendance in the UK

Correlation r = 0.6633634 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4400511 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 44% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total annual cinema attendance in the UK) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee) over the 22 years from 2001 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00076. 0.0007643413699692879000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.66 in 0.076% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,308 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.34, 0.85 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee (Letters)111211131299798129712151288130710
Total annual cinema attendance in the UK (Millions)1559000001759000001673000001713000001647000001566000001624000001642000001735000001692000001716000001725000001655000001575000001715000001683000001706000001770000001761000004400000074000000117300000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([11,12,11,13,12,9,9,7,9,8,12,9,7,12,15,12,8,8,13,0,7,10,])
array_2 = np.array([155900000,175900000,167300000,171300000,164700000,156600000,162400000,164200000,173500000,169200000,171600000,172500000,165500000,157500000,171500000,168300000,170600000,177000000,176100000,44000000,74000000,117300000,])
array_1_name = "Letters in the Winning Word in the Scripps National Spelling Bee"
array_2_name = "Total annual cinema attendance in the UK"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 1140 · Black Variable ID: 530 · Red Variable ID: 285
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0