about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,134 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and the second variable is Deere & Company's stock price (DE).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Best Supporting Actress winners get older, they develop a greater appreciation for life's wisdom and strength, reflecting the growth and stability of Deere & Company. Their maturity brings a sense of groundedness that resonates with the company's long-standing values, ultimately boosting investor confidence in DE. This results in a seasoned effect on the stock price, as if each award-winning actress is plowing the fields of success for Deere & Company, sowing the seeds of prosperity with their seasoned skill set. The golden touch of experience from these esteemed actresses seems to cultivate a bullish market for DE, proving that in the world of finance, age is more than just a number – it's a tractor of change.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [A photo-realistic image] Imagine a bustling movie set, with bright lights and a red carpet rolled out. In the foreground, a talented actress, radiant with joy, holds an Oscar statuette aloft as she stands in front of a cheering crowd. The atmosphere is electric with excitement and celebration. In the background, shareholders of Deere & Company observe a robust and powerful tractor moving effortlessly across a vast, sun-kissed field. The tractor's performance instills confidence and optimism in the shareholders, as they watch with assurance. The scene exudes a sense of prosperity and progress, reflected in the uptick of the company's stock price flashing on a digital ticker in the corner of the image. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Winning an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress requires a lot of patience and perseverance, qualities that Deere & Company shareholders appreciate, leading to increased confidence in the company and a boost in stock price.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie A photo-realistic image Cute 2D animation An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Winning an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress requires a lot of patience and perseverance, qualities that Deere & Company shareholders appreciate, leading to increased confidence in the company and a boost in stock price.
ChatGPT: Imagine a bustling movie set, with bright lights and a red carpet rolled out. A talented actress, beaming with joy and holding an Oscar statuette, stands in front of a cheering crowd. Meanwhile, in another scene, shareholders of Deere & Company observe a strong and sturdy tractor effortlessly plowing a vast field, which instills confidence and optimism in them. As a result, the stock ticker on the screen shows an uptick in the company's stock price.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a bustling movie set, with bright lights and a red carpet rolled out. A talented actress, beaming with joy and holding an Oscar statuette, stands in front of a cheering crowd. Meanwhile, in another scene, shareholders of Deere & Company observe a strong and sturdy tractor effortlessly plowing a vast field, which instills confidence and optimism in them. As a result, the stock ticker on the screen shows an uptick in the company's stock price. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [A photo-realistic image] Imagine a bustling movie set, with bright lights and a red carpet rolled out. In the foreground, a talented actress, radiant with joy, holds an Oscar statuette aloft as she stands in front of a cheering crowd. The atmosphere is electric with excitement and celebration. In the background, shareholders of Deere & Company observe a robust and powerful tractor moving effortlessly across a vast, sun-kissed field. The tractor's performance instills confidence and optimism in the shareholders, as they watch with assurance. The scene exudes a sense of prosperity and progress, reflected in the uptick of the company's stock price flashing on a digital ticker in the corner of the image.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age caused Deere & Company's stock price (DE) to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Supporting Actuarial Age: An Unconventional Correlation Between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's Stock Price

The Journal of Cinematic Finance and Stock Market Trends

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's stock price. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8447447 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Supporting Actuarial Age: An Unconventional Correlation Between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In an unexpected turn of events, this research delves into the curious correlation between the age of the Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winner and the stock price of Deere & Company. Leveraging data from Wikipedia and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a rigorous analysis from 2002 to 2021 and unearthed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8447447 with a p-value of less than 0.01. It's as if the stars in Hollywood are aligning with the stock market! Our findings present a compelling case for further exploration of this unusual relationship. Perhaps we have stumbled upon the reel stock market indicator—the Deere & Company's "Best Supporting Actress Age Index."

Speaking of age, did you hear about the dad joke at the Oscars? Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, just like the Best Supporting Actress age making up the stock price!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's stock price. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Supporting Actuarial Age: An Unconventional Correlation Between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In an unexpected turn of events, this research delves into the curious correlation between the age of the Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winner and the stock price of Deere & Company. Leveraging data from Wikipedia and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a rigorous analysis from 2002 to 2021 and unearthed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8447447 with a p-value of less than 0.01. It's as if the stars in Hollywood are aligning with the stock market! Our findings present a compelling case for further exploration of this unusual relationship. Perhaps we have stumbled upon the reel stock market indicator—the Deere & Company's "Best Supporting Actress Age Index."

Speaking of age, did you hear about the dad joke at the Oscars? Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, just like the Best Supporting Actress age making up the stock price!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Lights, camera, action! The world of finance and the glitz and glamour of Hollywood may seem like strange bedfellows, but in the realm of statistical analysis, anything is possible. The connection between the age of Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winners and the stock price of Deere & Company may sound like a plot twist in a peculiar movie, but our findings suggest that there may be substance behind the seemingly whimsical correlation.

Age may just be a number, but when it comes to Best Supporting Actress winners and a corporation's stock price, it could be more than just a mere statistic. It's like the red carpet rolled out for an unlikely duo: the seasoned performer and the industrial heavyweight. It's as if Julia Roberts and John Deere themselves are tangoing on Wall Street!

Just like a good wine, some things seem to improve with age. But who would have thought that the age of Hollywood's finest would influence the performance of a multinational corporation's stock? It's like a Hitchcockian twist in the world of financial analysis—suspenseful, intriguing, and undeniably unexpected.

Speaking of unexpected, did you hear about the actor who fell through the floorboards? He was just going through a stage!

But enough chit-chat, let's delve into the methodology and results that have unravelled this intriguing and unconventional correlation between the age of Oscar winners and the stock price of Deere & Company.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's stock price. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Supporting Actuarial Age: An Unconventional Correlation Between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In an unexpected turn of events, this research delves into the curious correlation between the age of the Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winner and the stock price of Deere & Company. Leveraging data from Wikipedia and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a rigorous analysis from 2002 to 2021 and unearthed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8447447 with a p-value of less than 0.01. It's as if the stars in Hollywood are aligning with the stock market! Our findings present a compelling case for further exploration of this unusual relationship. Perhaps we have stumbled upon the reel stock market indicator—the Deere & Company's "Best Supporting Actress Age Index."

Speaking of age, did you hear about the dad joke at the Oscars? Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, just like the Best Supporting Actress age making up the stock price!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Lights, camera, action! The world of finance and the glitz and glamour of Hollywood may seem like strange bedfellows, but in the realm of statistical analysis, anything is possible. The connection between the age of Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winners and the stock price of Deere & Company may sound like a plot twist in a peculiar movie, but our findings suggest that there may be substance behind the seemingly whimsical correlation.
Age may just be a number, but when it comes to Best Supporting Actress winners and a corporation's stock price, it could be more than just a mere statistic. It's like the red carpet rolled out for an unlikely duo: the seasoned performer and the industrial heavyweight. It's as if Julia Roberts and John Deere themselves are tangoing on Wall Street!
Just like a good wine, some things seem to improve with age. But who would have thought that the age of Hollywood's finest would influence the performance of a multinational corporation's stock? It's like a Hitchcockian twist in the world of financial analysis—suspenseful, intriguing, and undeniably unexpected.
Speaking of unexpected, did you hear about the actor who fell through the floorboards? He was just going through a stage!
But enough chit-chat, let's delve into the methodology and results that have unravelled this intriguing and unconventional correlation between the age of Oscar winners and the stock price of Deere & Company.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Recent studies have delved into the intersection between entertainment and finance, uncovering surprising and inexplicable correlations that challenge conventional wisdom. In "Smith and Doe," the authors find that Best Supporting Actress winners' ages have remarkable influence on a select group of company stock prices. This unorthodox association prompts financial analysts to contemplate the unpredictable and idiosyncratic nature of market influences.

Speaking of influences, did you hear about the actress who was in an accident? She broke a leg, but she still managed to steal the spotlight—now that's what you call a real "breakout" performance!

Furthermore, "Jones et al." meticulously examined the temporal relationship between Deere & Company's stock performance and the historical age of Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winners. The compelling findings suggest a hypothesis that defies the traditional market indicators, highlighting the need for further investigation into this enigmatic link.

Unconventional correlations seem to be as rare as a good pun, wouldn't you say?

Turning to related non-fiction literature, "Market Trends and Artistic Influences" by W. Buffett explores the often overlooked impacts of seemingly disparate cultural phenomena on financial markets. Additionally, "Actuarial Analysis in Cinema" by P. Lynch dissects the statistical anomalies that occasionally arise in the world of entertainment, shedding light on the unexpected interplay between artistic expression and economic forces.

On a lighter note, fictional works such as "The Stock Market Sorcery" by J.K. Rowling and "The Grapes of Stock" by John Steinbeck offer whimsical narratives that reflect the peculiar yet captivating fusion of financial dynamics and dramatic artistry. These imaginative tales serve as a reminder that reality can often be stranger than fiction—much like the uncanny connection we have uncovered between the Best Supporting Actress winner age and Deere & Company stock performance.

In the midst of rigorous data analysis, the researchers also sought inspiration from unexpected sources, including children's shows and cartoons. By delving into the world of animated entertainment, the team uncovered a treasure trove of insights, culminating in a eureka moment reminiscent of a colorful Saturday morning revelation. It's almost as surprising as finding out that the price of Deere & Company stock is inversely proportional to the number of times the characters in "Paw Patrol" say "pawsome" in an episode!

Now, let's transition to discussing the groundbreaking methodology and results that underpin this unforeseen correlation between the age of Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winners and the stock price of Deere & Company.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's stock price. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Supporting Actuarial Age: An Unconventional Correlation Between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In an unexpected turn of events, this research delves into the curious correlation between the age of the Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winner and the stock price of Deere & Company. Leveraging data from Wikipedia and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a rigorous analysis from 2002 to 2021 and unearthed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8447447 with a p-value of less than 0.01. It's as if the stars in Hollywood are aligning with the stock market! Our findings present a compelling case for further exploration of this unusual relationship. Perhaps we have stumbled upon the reel stock market indicator—the Deere & Company's "Best Supporting Actress Age Index."

Speaking of age, did you hear about the dad joke at the Oscars? Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, just like the Best Supporting Actress age making up the stock price!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Lights, camera, action! The world of finance and the glitz and glamour of Hollywood may seem like strange bedfellows, but in the realm of statistical analysis, anything is possible. The connection between the age of Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winners and the stock price of Deere & Company may sound like a plot twist in a peculiar movie, but our findings suggest that there may be substance behind the seemingly whimsical correlation.
Age may just be a number, but when it comes to Best Supporting Actress winners and a corporation's stock price, it could be more than just a mere statistic. It's like the red carpet rolled out for an unlikely duo: the seasoned performer and the industrial heavyweight. It's as if Julia Roberts and John Deere themselves are tangoing on Wall Street!
Just like a good wine, some things seem to improve with age. But who would have thought that the age of Hollywood's finest would influence the performance of a multinational corporation's stock? It's like a Hitchcockian twist in the world of financial analysis—suspenseful, intriguing, and undeniably unexpected.
Speaking of unexpected, did you hear about the actor who fell through the floorboards? He was just going through a stage!
But enough chit-chat, let's delve into the methodology and results that have unravelled this intriguing and unconventional correlation between the age of Oscar winners and the stock price of Deere & Company.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the mysterious connection between the age of Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winners and Deere & Company's stock price, we embarked on a journey of data collection and analysis that would make even the daring explorers of old quake in their boots. Our team scoured the depths of the internet, bravely venturing into the wilds of Wikipedia and the labyrinthine corridors of LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to seek out the treasure trove of data from the years 2002 to 2021. It was a quest fit for the most intrepid of researchers, armed with nothing but a keyboard and a fervent longing for statistical enlightenment.

We gathered data on the age of each Best Supporting Actress winner from their illustrious triumphs to create a veritable tapestry of Hollywood's finest across the years. The stock prices of the esteemed Deere & Company were likewise meticulously gathered, forming a formidable arsenal of financial data to wield in our quest for correlation. We would have made Indiana Jones proud with our dedication to delving into the depths for our data—no dusty tomb or forgotten chamber could deter us from our mission.

In the spirit of statistical alchemy, we subjected the collected data to a rigorous analysis, employing advanced statistical models and techniques more complex than a plot twist in a Christopher Nolan film. We calculated correlation coefficients and p-values with the meticulous precision of a surgeon wielding a scalpel, unraveling the enigma of the relationship between the age of Best Supporting Actress winners and the stock price of Deere & Company. It was like extracting hidden gems from a mine of numbers, the thrill of discovery palpable with every keystroke.

Now, you might be thinking, "What do you call a belt made out of watches? A waist of time!" Much like the dad jokes we can't resist, we approached the methodology with both precision and a hint of whimsy—after all, who said statistical analysis couldn't have a dash of entertainment?

With the precision of a seasoned detective solving a case of elusive clues, we embarked upon the grand task of unraveling this seemingly fantastical correlation. Our tools were as formidable as they were eclectic, blending the artistry of data visualization with the precision of mathematical analysis. The culmination of our efforts was a correlation coefficient of 0.8447447, with a p-value of less than 0.01, laying bare the significant connection between the age of Best Supporting Actress winners and the stock price of Deere & Company.

Our findings were nothing short of extraordinary, shedding light on an unexpected relationship worthy of a dramatic reveal in a blockbuster film. It was a statistical journey filled with unexpected twists, leaving us with a conclusion that defied the norms of conventional wisdom, akin to a plot twist in a M. Night Shyamalan movie.

With our methodology unwrapped like a box of statistical delights, it’s time to bask in the warm glow of these unconventional findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's stock price. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8447447, r-squared of 0.7135936, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Supporting Actuarial Age: An Unconventional Correlation Between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In an unexpected turn of events, this research delves into the curious correlation between the age of the Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winner and the stock price of Deere & Company. Leveraging data from Wikipedia and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a rigorous analysis from 2002 to 2021 and unearthed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8447447 with a p-value of less than 0.01. It's as if the stars in Hollywood are aligning with the stock market! Our findings present a compelling case for further exploration of this unusual relationship. Perhaps we have stumbled upon the reel stock market indicator—the Deere & Company's "Best Supporting Actress Age Index."

Speaking of age, did you hear about the dad joke at the Oscars? Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, just like the Best Supporting Actress age making up the stock price!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Lights, camera, action! The world of finance and the glitz and glamour of Hollywood may seem like strange bedfellows, but in the realm of statistical analysis, anything is possible. The connection between the age of Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winners and the stock price of Deere & Company may sound like a plot twist in a peculiar movie, but our findings suggest that there may be substance behind the seemingly whimsical correlation.
Age may just be a number, but when it comes to Best Supporting Actress winners and a corporation's stock price, it could be more than just a mere statistic. It's like the red carpet rolled out for an unlikely duo: the seasoned performer and the industrial heavyweight. It's as if Julia Roberts and John Deere themselves are tangoing on Wall Street!
Just like a good wine, some things seem to improve with age. But who would have thought that the age of Hollywood's finest would influence the performance of a multinational corporation's stock? It's like a Hitchcockian twist in the world of financial analysis—suspenseful, intriguing, and undeniably unexpected.
Speaking of unexpected, did you hear about the actor who fell through the floorboards? He was just going through a stage!
But enough chit-chat, let's delve into the methodology and results that have unravelled this intriguing and unconventional correlation between the age of Oscar winners and the stock price of Deere & Company.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between the age of Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winners and the stock price of Deere & Company from 2002 to 2021. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.8447447, with an r-squared value of 0.7135936, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This shows a strong and statistically significant relationship between the two variables. It seems that the secret to Deere & Company's stock success may lie in the age of Hollywood's shining stars. It's as if the golden age of cinema and the green fields of John Deere are intertwining in a captivating financial ballet!

A recent study has shown that cows produce more milk when they listen to relaxing music. Maybe Deere & Company could consider playing some Oscar-winning performances to boost productivity in the fields!

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the robust correlation we observed between the age of Best Supporting Actress winners and Deere & Company's stock price. It's as clear as day that the age of these esteemed actresses has an uncanny influence on the market performance of this agricultural titan.

It's like Meryl Streep accidentally wandered onto the trading floor and started giving acting masterclasses to the stockbrokers!

The implications of this correlation are intriguing and call for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms at play. Could it be that the wisdom and experience of these award-winning actresses somehow reflect or influence the performance and perceived value of Deere & Company in the market? This unconventional association between Hollywood and the stock market unveils a new dimension in the world of financial analysis and invites us to consider the broader social and cultural influences on market dynamics.

It's like the stock market has a front-row seat reserved for the Oscars, and the winners' ages are stealing the show!

These findings pave the way for a deeper exploration of the connections between popular culture, societal perceptions, and financial indicators. The unexpected marriage of the entertainment industry and the stock market opens the door to a wealth of opportunities for future research and could even lead to the emergence of entirely new investment strategies.

It's as if a Hollywood blockbuster and a finance documentary collaborated to create a suspenseful, heartwarming financial narrative that nobody saw coming!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's stock price. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Supporting Actuarial Age: An Unconventional Correlation Between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In an unexpected turn of events, this research delves into the curious correlation between the age of the Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winner and the stock price of Deere & Company. Leveraging data from Wikipedia and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a rigorous analysis from 2002 to 2021 and unearthed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8447447 with a p-value of less than 0.01. It's as if the stars in Hollywood are aligning with the stock market! Our findings present a compelling case for further exploration of this unusual relationship. Perhaps we have stumbled upon the reel stock market indicator—the Deere & Company's "Best Supporting Actress Age Index."

Speaking of age, did you hear about the dad joke at the Oscars? Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, just like the Best Supporting Actress age making up the stock price!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Recent studies have delved into the intersection between entertainment and finance, uncovering surprising and inexplicable correlations that challenge conventional wisdom. In "Smith and Doe," the authors find that Best Supporting Actress winners' ages have remarkable influence on a select group of company stock prices. This unorthodox association prompts financial analysts to contemplate the unpredictable and idiosyncratic nature of market influences.
Speaking of influences, did you hear about the actress who was in an accident? She broke a leg, but she still managed to steal the spotlight—now that's what you call a real "breakout" performance!
Furthermore, "Jones et al." meticulously examined the temporal relationship between Deere & Company's stock performance and the historical age of Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winners. The compelling findings suggest a hypothesis that defies the traditional market indicators, highlighting the need for further investigation into this enigmatic link.
Unconventional correlations seem to be as rare as a good pun, wouldn't you say?
Turning to related non-fiction literature, "Market Trends and Artistic Influences" by W. Buffett explores the often overlooked impacts of seemingly disparate cultural phenomena on financial markets. Additionally, "Actuarial Analysis in Cinema" by P. Lynch dissects the statistical anomalies that occasionally arise in the world of entertainment, shedding light on the unexpected interplay between artistic expression and economic forces.
On a lighter note, fictional works such as "The Stock Market Sorcery" by J.K. Rowling and "The Grapes of Stock" by John Steinbeck offer whimsical narratives that reflect the peculiar yet captivating fusion of financial dynamics and dramatic artistry. These imaginative tales serve as a reminder that reality can often be stranger than fiction—much like the uncanny connection we have uncovered between the Best Supporting Actress winner age and Deere & Company stock performance.
In the midst of rigorous data analysis, the researchers also sought inspiration from unexpected sources, including children's shows and cartoons. By delving into the world of animated entertainment, the team uncovered a treasure trove of insights, culminating in a eureka moment reminiscent of a colorful Saturday morning revelation. It's almost as surprising as finding out that the price of Deere & Company stock is inversely proportional to the number of times the characters in "Paw Patrol" say "pawsome" in an episode!
Now, let's transition to discussing the groundbreaking methodology and results that underpin this unforeseen correlation between the age of Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winners and the stock price of Deere & Company.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between the age of Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winners and the stock price of Deere & Company from 2002 to 2021. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.8447447, with an r-squared value of 0.7135936, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This shows a strong and statistically significant relationship between the two variables. It seems that the secret to Deere & Company's stock success may lie in the age of Hollywood's shining stars. It's as if the golden age of cinema and the green fields of John Deere are intertwining in a captivating financial ballet!
A recent study has shown that cows produce more milk when they listen to relaxing music. Maybe Deere & Company could consider playing some Oscar-winning performances to boost productivity in the fields!
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the robust correlation we observed between the age of Best Supporting Actress winners and Deere & Company's stock price. It's as clear as day that the age of these esteemed actresses has an uncanny influence on the market performance of this agricultural titan.
It's like Meryl Streep accidentally wandered onto the trading floor and started giving acting masterclasses to the stockbrokers!
The implications of this correlation are intriguing and call for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms at play. Could it be that the wisdom and experience of these award-winning actresses somehow reflect or influence the performance and perceived value of Deere & Company in the market? This unconventional association between Hollywood and the stock market unveils a new dimension in the world of financial analysis and invites us to consider the broader social and cultural influences on market dynamics.
It's like the stock market has a front-row seat reserved for the Oscars, and the winners' ages are stealing the show!
These findings pave the way for a deeper exploration of the connections between popular culture, societal perceptions, and financial indicators. The unexpected marriage of the entertainment industry and the stock market opens the door to a wealth of opportunities for future research and could even lead to the emergence of entirely new investment strategies.
It's as if a Hollywood blockbuster and a finance documentary collaborated to create a suspenseful, heartwarming financial narrative that nobody saw coming!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The correlation between the age of Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winners and the stock price of Deere & Company has revealed an unexpected and statistically significant relationship. Our findings not only validate but also expand upon the prior research conducted by "Smith and Doe" and "Jones et al.," which similarly documented the remarkable influence of Best Supporting Actress winner age on certain companies' stock prices. These results highlight the unpredictability and eccentricity of market influences, reaffirming the need for analysts to consider unconventional factors when assessing stock performance. It seems that the sweet smell of Oscar success might just be wafting over Wall Street, influencing the livelihood of the stock market in ways we never imagined.

In a study that showed cows produce more milk when they listen to relaxing music, perhaps Deere & Company could consider playing some Academy Award-winning performances to boost productivity in the fields. After all, who knew that Hollywood stars held the key to agricultural and stock market success?

The robust correlation coefficient obtained in our analysis emphasizes the significant impact of Best Supporting Actress winner age on Deere & Company's stock price. It's almost as if the red carpet leads directly to the stock exchange, with acclaimed actresses inadvertently influencing market dynamics. This link between the entertainment industry and the stock market challenges conventional theories and prompts a reevaluation of the multifaceted influences on financial markets. It's like we've stumbled upon a Hollywood ending to the stock market's story—a twist nobody saw coming.

The implications of this correlation are substantial and present a fascinating avenue for further investigation. Could the wisdom and experience of award-winning actresses convey a sense of credibility and trust that resonates within the marketplace? This unconventional association reveals a new dimension in financial analysis, inviting deeper exploration into the broader social and cultural influences on market dynamics. In a way, it's like the stock market has taken center stage at the Oscars, and the winners' ages are stealing the show.

Our research underscores the potential for alternative investments strategies based on unexpected cultural and artistic phenomena. This unorthodox relationship between Hollywood and the stock market has the potential to revolutionize investment strategies, transforming the financial sector into a captivating, real-life financial blockbuster.

It's almost as if the financial world has turned into a Hollywood script, with the unexpected correlation between Best Supporting Actress age and stock performance emerging as the plot twist of the century.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's stock price. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Supporting Actuarial Age: An Unconventional Correlation Between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In an unexpected turn of events, this research delves into the curious correlation between the age of the Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winner and the stock price of Deere & Company. Leveraging data from Wikipedia and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a rigorous analysis from 2002 to 2021 and unearthed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8447447 with a p-value of less than 0.01. It's as if the stars in Hollywood are aligning with the stock market! Our findings present a compelling case for further exploration of this unusual relationship. Perhaps we have stumbled upon the reel stock market indicator—the Deere & Company's "Best Supporting Actress Age Index."

Speaking of age, did you hear about the dad joke at the Oscars? Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, just like the Best Supporting Actress age making up the stock price!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Lights, camera, action! The world of finance and the glitz and glamour of Hollywood may seem like strange bedfellows, but in the realm of statistical analysis, anything is possible. The connection between the age of Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winners and the stock price of Deere & Company may sound like a plot twist in a peculiar movie, but our findings suggest that there may be substance behind the seemingly whimsical correlation.
Age may just be a number, but when it comes to Best Supporting Actress winners and a corporation's stock price, it could be more than just a mere statistic. It's like the red carpet rolled out for an unlikely duo: the seasoned performer and the industrial heavyweight. It's as if Julia Roberts and John Deere themselves are tangoing on Wall Street!
Just like a good wine, some things seem to improve with age. But who would have thought that the age of Hollywood's finest would influence the performance of a multinational corporation's stock? It's like a Hitchcockian twist in the world of financial analysis—suspenseful, intriguing, and undeniably unexpected.
Speaking of unexpected, did you hear about the actor who fell through the floorboards? He was just going through a stage!
But enough chit-chat, let's delve into the methodology and results that have unravelled this intriguing and unconventional correlation between the age of Oscar winners and the stock price of Deere & Company.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between the age of Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winners and the stock price of Deere & Company from 2002 to 2021. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.8447447, with an r-squared value of 0.7135936, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This shows a strong and statistically significant relationship between the two variables. It seems that the secret to Deere & Company's stock success may lie in the age of Hollywood's shining stars. It's as if the golden age of cinema and the green fields of John Deere are intertwining in a captivating financial ballet!
A recent study has shown that cows produce more milk when they listen to relaxing music. Maybe Deere & Company could consider playing some Oscar-winning performances to boost productivity in the fields!
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the robust correlation we observed between the age of Best Supporting Actress winners and Deere & Company's stock price. It's as clear as day that the age of these esteemed actresses has an uncanny influence on the market performance of this agricultural titan.
It's like Meryl Streep accidentally wandered onto the trading floor and started giving acting masterclasses to the stockbrokers!
The implications of this correlation are intriguing and call for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms at play. Could it be that the wisdom and experience of these award-winning actresses somehow reflect or influence the performance and perceived value of Deere & Company in the market? This unconventional association between Hollywood and the stock market unveils a new dimension in the world of financial analysis and invites us to consider the broader social and cultural influences on market dynamics.
It's like the stock market has a front-row seat reserved for the Oscars, and the winners' ages are stealing the show!
These findings pave the way for a deeper exploration of the connections between popular culture, societal perceptions, and financial indicators. The unexpected marriage of the entertainment industry and the stock market opens the door to a wealth of opportunities for future research and could even lead to the emergence of entirely new investment strategies.
It's as if a Hollywood blockbuster and a finance documentary collaborated to create a suspenseful, heartwarming financial narrative that nobody saw coming!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has shed light on the captivating correlation between the age of Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winners and the stock price of Deere & Company. It seems that the seasoned brilliance of these Hollywood stars has a remarkable impact on the performance of this agricultural behemoth in the stock market. It's like the Oscars have set the stage for an unexpected financial drama, where the leading ladies' ages take the spotlight and steer the market performance like seasoned directors.

So, what did the farmer say when he couldn't find his tractor? "Where's my Deere-est tractor?" Just like the Best Supporting Actress winners, Deere & Company's stock has surely found its place in the spotlight.

Our findings hint at the potential influence of societal perceptions and cultural phenomena on market dynamics, encouraging further exploration and reflection on the intricate interplay between popular culture and financial indicators. It's as if Hollywood's influence extends beyond the silver screen and factors into the green exchanges of Wall Street, creating an unconventional symphony of art and commerce.

It seems we've stumbled upon the reel deal - the Deere & Company's "Best Supporting Actress Age Index" - offering a fresh perspective on the intricate web of influences shaping financial markets. It's like discovering the hidden easter egg in a blockbuster movie; this unexpected correlation has the potential to reshape the landscape of financial analysis.

In light of these revelatory findings, it's clear that no more research is needed in this area. This research has sown the seeds for an unconventional approach to exploring the interconnections between Hollywood glamour and stock market performance. It's like the closing credits are rolling for this story, leaving us with an unexpected twist that will have audiences talking for years to come.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Supporting Actuarial Age: An Unconventional Correlation Between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Cinematic Finance and Stock Market Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Supporting Actuarial Age: An Unconventional Correlation Between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Economic Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Supporting Actuarial Age: An Unconventional Correlation Between Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age and Deere & Company's Stock Price with an abstract of In an unexpected turn of events, this research delves into the curious correlation between the age of the Academy Award Best Supporting Actress winner and the stock price of Deere & Company. Leveraging data from Wikipedia and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a rigorous analysis from 2002 to 2021 and unearthed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8447447 with a p-value of less than 0.01. It's as if the stars in Hollywood are aligning with the stock market! Our findings present a compelling case for further exploration of this unusual relationship. Perhaps we have stumbled upon the reel stock market indicator—the Deere & Company's "Best Supporting Actress Age Index."
Speaking of age, did you hear about the dad joke at the Oscars? Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, just like the Best Supporting Actress age making up the stock price!

ChatGPT:

Academy Award, Best Supporting Actress, winner, age, Deere & Company, stock price, correlation, analysis, Hollywood, stock market, stock market indicator, age index, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, data analysis, relationship, research, unusual correlation, Hollywood stars, stock market impact, Oscars, dad joke, scientists, atoms

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age

Deere & Company's stock price (DE)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Deere & Company (DE) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Deere & Company's stock price (DE)

Correlation r = 0.8447447 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7135936 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 71.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Deere & Company's stock price (DE)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age) over the 20 years from 2002 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.8E-6. 0.0000027927966833175265000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 0.00028% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 358,064 random variables You don't actually need 358 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.64, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age (Age in years)3133343535254734425041303146275158485273
Deere & Company's stock price (DE) (Stock price)22.182332.4837.2134.0147.8594.0138.7454.7483.9379.1287.9790.9588.7975.78103.68156.67146.23174.24271.81




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([31,33,34,35,35,25,47,34,42,50,41,30,31,46,27,51,58,48,52,73,])
array_2 = np.array([22.18,23,32.48,37.21,34.01,47.85,94.01,38.74,54.74,83.93,79.12,87.97,90.95,88.79,75.78,103.68,156.67,146.23,174.24,271.81,])
array_1_name = "Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age"
array_2_name = "Deere & Company's stock price (DE)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 1134 · Black Variable ID: 529 · Red Variable ID: 1619
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0