about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,109 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Republican Senators in West Virginia and the second variable is Google searches for 'where can i stream friends'.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The increase in Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia led to a surge in 'where can i stream friends' searches because as the political landscape shifted, so did the TV streaming options. It seems the race to stream Friends was really heating up, and just like a political campaign, everyone wanted to be in the winning party when it came to accessing their favorite sitcom. It's a classic case of red states, blue states, and all the streaming debates in between! Looks like in this election, the people of West Virginia weren't just voting for their Senators, they were also casting their ballots for the best way to enjoy some Central Perk camaraderie.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a meme where a cozy living room in West Virginia is depicted. In the scene, the TV remote rests next to a ballot box on a coffee table. The TV screen displays "Friends" about to start streaming, and a laptop nearby shows a search for "Where can I stream Friends?" The room is bathed in warm red and blue hues, reflecting the convergence of political fervor and streaming choices. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'where can i stream friends'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Glitch art Minimalism A photo-realistic image Whimsical illustration a meme
ChatGPT: a meme

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'where can i stream friends', in the following situation: The increase in Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia led to a surge in 'where can i stream friends' searches because as the political landscape shifted, so did the TV streaming options. It seems the race to stream Friends was really heating up, and just like a political campaign, everyone wanted to be in the winning party when it came to accessing their favorite sitcom. It's a classic case of red states, blue states, and all the streaming debates in between! Looks like in this election, the people of West Virginia weren't just voting for their Senators, they were also casting their ballots for the best way to enjoy some Central Perk camaraderie.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy living room in West Virginia, the TV remote sits next to a ballot box resting on a coffee table. On the TV screen, "Friends" is about to start streaming, as a search for "Where can I stream Friends?" lights up on a nearby laptop. The room is bathed in warm red and blue hues, reflecting the convergence of political fervor and streaming choices.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a meme ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy living room in West Virginia, the TV remote sits next to a ballot box resting on a coffee table. On the TV screen, "Friends" is about to start streaming, as a search for "Where can I stream Friends?" lights up on a nearby laptop. The room is bathed in warm red and blue hues, reflecting the convergence of political fervor and streaming choices. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a meme where a cozy living room in West Virginia is depicted. In the scene, the TV remote rests next to a ballot box on a coffee table. The TV screen displays "Friends" about to start streaming, and a laptop nearby shows a search for "Where can I stream Friends?" The room is bathed in warm red and blue hues, reflecting the convergence of political fervor and streaming choices.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia caused where can i stream friends (Google searches for 'where can i stream friends') to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
In West Virginia, Will 'Friends' Stream Drive GOP on the Scene?

The Journal of Appalachian Political Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'where can i stream friends'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9864207 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
In West Virginia, Will 'Friends' Stream Drive GOP on the Scene?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected link between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and the popular Google search phrase "where can I stream Friends." While the connection between political leanings and television preferences may seem far-fetched, our research uncovers a surprisingly strong correlation.

Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2005 to 2020. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9864207 and p < 0.01, suggesting a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Despite the seemingly lighthearted nature of the search term, our analysis suggests that it may serve as a unique proxy for gauging political sentiment. The results, while unexpected, raise thought-provoking questions about the potential influence of television viewing habits on political decision-making. As for the unexpected link between 'Friends' and political affiliations, it seems that in West Virginia, political preferences and sitcom streaming may not be as distant as one might think. This correlation is 'central perk-ing' our interest in understanding the peculiar connections between cultural consumption and political behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'where can i stream friends'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
In West Virginia, Will 'Friends' Stream Drive GOP on the Scene?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected link between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and the popular Google search phrase "where can I stream Friends." While the connection between political leanings and television preferences may seem far-fetched, our research uncovers a surprisingly strong correlation.

Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2005 to 2020. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9864207 and p < 0.01, suggesting a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Despite the seemingly lighthearted nature of the search term, our analysis suggests that it may serve as a unique proxy for gauging political sentiment. The results, while unexpected, raise thought-provoking questions about the potential influence of television viewing habits on political decision-making. As for the unexpected link between 'Friends' and political affiliations, it seems that in West Virginia, political preferences and sitcom streaming may not be as distant as one might think. This correlation is 'central perk-ing' our interest in understanding the peculiar connections between cultural consumption and political behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of popular culture and political behavior has long been a topic of interest among researchers. However, the connection between the television show "Friends" and the voting patterns of West Virginian Republicans may initially appear as far-fetched as a sitcom plotline. Nevertheless, our examination of Google search trends and political voting data uncovers a surprising correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena.

The idea that Google searches for "where can I stream Friends" could be related to political decision-making may seem as unexpected as Chandler's sarcastic one-liners. Yet, our analysis reveals a statistically significant association between these variables, prompting us to delve further into the potential implications of this unlikely relationship. It appears that in the realm of political affiliations, West Virginians may also be asking, "Could I BE any more Republican?"

The undertaking of this study was not merely an exercise in humor, but rather an earnest effort to explore the nuanced factors that could potentially influence electoral outcomes. While the humorous undertones of our findings cannot be ignored, the data indicates a compelling connection between the cultural consumption of a beloved sitcom and the electoral preferences of a specific demographic. It seems that in the wild and wonderful world of West Virginia politics, the influence of television re-runs may be more potent than initially presumed. This unexpected synergy between popular media and political proclivities is an intriguing area for exploration, shedding light on the intricate tapestry of human behavior and decision-making.

Through this investigation, we aim to contribute to the ongoing discourse on the multifaceted influences that shape political attitudes and actions. As we proceed to unravel the unexpected ties between sitcom streaming habits and political affiliations in West Virginia, it becomes clear that the fusion of popular culture and politics may hold a wealth of unexplored insight. Much like Ross and Rachel's on-again, off-again relationship, the connection between the search for streaming "Friends" and Republican votes in West Virginia presents a compelling and enigmatic narrative that merits further scrutiny.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'where can i stream friends'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
In West Virginia, Will 'Friends' Stream Drive GOP on the Scene?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected link between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and the popular Google search phrase "where can I stream Friends." While the connection between political leanings and television preferences may seem far-fetched, our research uncovers a surprisingly strong correlation.

Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2005 to 2020. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9864207 and p < 0.01, suggesting a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Despite the seemingly lighthearted nature of the search term, our analysis suggests that it may serve as a unique proxy for gauging political sentiment. The results, while unexpected, raise thought-provoking questions about the potential influence of television viewing habits on political decision-making. As for the unexpected link between 'Friends' and political affiliations, it seems that in West Virginia, political preferences and sitcom streaming may not be as distant as one might think. This correlation is 'central perk-ing' our interest in understanding the peculiar connections between cultural consumption and political behavior.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of popular culture and political behavior has long been a topic of interest among researchers. However, the connection between the television show "Friends" and the voting patterns of West Virginian Republicans may initially appear as far-fetched as a sitcom plotline. Nevertheless, our examination of Google search trends and political voting data uncovers a surprising correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena.
The idea that Google searches for "where can I stream Friends" could be related to political decision-making may seem as unexpected as Chandler's sarcastic one-liners. Yet, our analysis reveals a statistically significant association between these variables, prompting us to delve further into the potential implications of this unlikely relationship. It appears that in the realm of political affiliations, West Virginians may also be asking, "Could I BE any more Republican?"
The undertaking of this study was not merely an exercise in humor, but rather an earnest effort to explore the nuanced factors that could potentially influence electoral outcomes. While the humorous undertones of our findings cannot be ignored, the data indicates a compelling connection between the cultural consumption of a beloved sitcom and the electoral preferences of a specific demographic. It seems that in the wild and wonderful world of West Virginia politics, the influence of television re-runs may be more potent than initially presumed. This unexpected synergy between popular media and political proclivities is an intriguing area for exploration, shedding light on the intricate tapestry of human behavior and decision-making.
Through this investigation, we aim to contribute to the ongoing discourse on the multifaceted influences that shape political attitudes and actions. As we proceed to unravel the unexpected ties between sitcom streaming habits and political affiliations in West Virginia, it becomes clear that the fusion of popular culture and politics may hold a wealth of unexplored insight. Much like Ross and Rachel's on-again, off-again relationship, the connection between the search for streaming "Friends" and Republican votes in West Virginia presents a compelling and enigmatic narrative that merits further scrutiny.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between political behavior and popular culture has been of perennial interest among scholars. Smith et al. (2010) examined the correlation between television viewing habits and voting patterns, revealing compelling associations between certain genres of television programming and political affiliations. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the potential influence of sitcoms on political decision-making, highlighting the subtle but impactful role of television consumption in shaping voter attitudes. However, the specific connection between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and the Google query "where can I stream Friends" has yet to receive significant scholarly attention.

Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, "Media and Politics: A Cultural Analysis" by Brown (2008) provides a comprehensive exploration of the interplay between media consumption and political preferences, shedding light on the intricate ways in which popular culture can intersect with electoral behavior. Furthermore, "Television and Politics: A Modern Perspective" by White (2012) offers a nuanced examination of the potential effects of television viewing habits on political decision-making, offering insights that may be pertinent to the current study.

On the more speculative side, "The Power of Sitcoms: Understanding the Influence of Television on Society" by Grey (2017) presents a thought-provoking analysis of the ways in which sitcoms may subtly shape societal attitudes and behaviors, hinting at the possibility of unforeseen connections between television preferences and political inclinations. Additionally, "Friends: A Cultural Phenomenon" by Black (2015) delves deeply into the enduring impact of the beloved sitcom "Friends" on popular culture, presenting a compelling argument for the show's pervasive influence.

In the fictional realm, works such as "Loyalties and Laughter: The Influence of Television on Society" by Green (2019) and "Friends and Foes: Exploring the Dynamics of Cultural Consumption" by Red (2013) offer intriguing, albeit speculative, insights into the potential interplay between sitcom streaming habits and political affiliations.

As part of the empirical research for this project, the authors have engaged in the thorough analysis of episodes of the television show "Friends," "How I Met Your Mother," and "Parks and Recreation," seeking to contextualize the sitcom-watching habits of West Virginian Republicans. These shows were selected for their thematic relevance and to provide a broader understanding of the cultural landscape that may shape the political attitudes of the demographic under study.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'where can i stream friends'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends . You used data from 2005 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
In West Virginia, Will 'Friends' Stream Drive GOP on the Scene?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected link between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and the popular Google search phrase "where can I stream Friends." While the connection between political leanings and television preferences may seem far-fetched, our research uncovers a surprisingly strong correlation.

Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2005 to 2020. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9864207 and p < 0.01, suggesting a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Despite the seemingly lighthearted nature of the search term, our analysis suggests that it may serve as a unique proxy for gauging political sentiment. The results, while unexpected, raise thought-provoking questions about the potential influence of television viewing habits on political decision-making. As for the unexpected link between 'Friends' and political affiliations, it seems that in West Virginia, political preferences and sitcom streaming may not be as distant as one might think. This correlation is 'central perk-ing' our interest in understanding the peculiar connections between cultural consumption and political behavior.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of popular culture and political behavior has long been a topic of interest among researchers. However, the connection between the television show "Friends" and the voting patterns of West Virginian Republicans may initially appear as far-fetched as a sitcom plotline. Nevertheless, our examination of Google search trends and political voting data uncovers a surprising correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena.
The idea that Google searches for "where can I stream Friends" could be related to political decision-making may seem as unexpected as Chandler's sarcastic one-liners. Yet, our analysis reveals a statistically significant association between these variables, prompting us to delve further into the potential implications of this unlikely relationship. It appears that in the realm of political affiliations, West Virginians may also be asking, "Could I BE any more Republican?"
The undertaking of this study was not merely an exercise in humor, but rather an earnest effort to explore the nuanced factors that could potentially influence electoral outcomes. While the humorous undertones of our findings cannot be ignored, the data indicates a compelling connection between the cultural consumption of a beloved sitcom and the electoral preferences of a specific demographic. It seems that in the wild and wonderful world of West Virginia politics, the influence of television re-runs may be more potent than initially presumed. This unexpected synergy between popular media and political proclivities is an intriguing area for exploration, shedding light on the intricate tapestry of human behavior and decision-making.
Through this investigation, we aim to contribute to the ongoing discourse on the multifaceted influences that shape political attitudes and actions. As we proceed to unravel the unexpected ties between sitcom streaming habits and political affiliations in West Virginia, it becomes clear that the fusion of popular culture and politics may hold a wealth of unexplored insight. Much like Ross and Rachel's on-again, off-again relationship, the connection between the search for streaming "Friends" and Republican votes in West Virginia presents a compelling and enigmatic narrative that merits further scrutiny.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The current study employed a combination of quantitative data analysis and search query trends to investigate the purported relationship between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and the Google search query "where can I stream Friends." The morphing of cultural consumption and political behavior is indeed quite the sitcom-esque plot twist, prompting an unconventional methodological approach.

To commence, data on Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia were sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, encompassing the electoral period from 2005 to 2020. The selection of this timeframe aimed to capture the evolving political landscape and the enduring legacy of the iconic television show "Friends."

Next, the Google search query data for "where can I stream Friends" was extracted from Google Trends, offering insights into the volume and geographic distribution of searches for this specific query. We chose this search query due to its resonance with '90s nostalgia and the timeless appeal of the show's humor, despite any initial skepticism about its potential connection to political behaviors.

The analysis of the data entailed an exploration of temporal patterns, seeking to identify any synchronous fluctuations between Republican voting trends and search query volumes. The statistical analysis utilized correlation coefficients and regression models to quantify the strength and direction of the association between these ostensibly unrelated variables. This methodological fusion aimed to uncover insights while also providing a nod to the unlikely convergence of political demographics and sitcom fandom.

Moreover, to ensure the robustness of our findings, sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the stability of the observed relationship across different sub-periods and demographic segments. This approach sought to account for any potential confounding variables and to uphold the integrity of the analysis, much like a loyal supporting character upholding the plotline of a beloved series.

Additionally, we incorporated a novel approach by employing sentiment analysis algorithms to discern the emotional tone of online discussions related to both political discourse and television streaming preferences. This method sought to probe the affective undercurrent that may underpin the expressed sentiments within these seemingly distinct realms, uncovering the subtle emotional resonances that extend beyond the surface-level narratives. This approach was chosen to elucidate any latent emotional connections that may underlie the seemingly flippant search queries and political decision-making, akin to uncovering the underlying humor in a seemingly straightforward punchline.

Amidst this methodological medley, the synthesis of quantitative and qualitative data allowed for a comprehensive inquiry into the potential interplay of cultural consumption and political preferences, albeit a narrative unlikely to unfold in a traditional academic research context. Upon establishing the distinctive connection between "Friends" streaming inquiries and Republican votes, we recognize the need to interpret this correlation within the broader context of social and cultural dynamics. This methodological journey, though unorthodox in its thematic alignment, ultimately serves to illuminate the intricate interplay between the seemingly incongruent realms of popular culture and political inclinations. Much like a captivating sitcom that unfolds unexpected twists and turns, our methodological approach aimed to capture the complexities of human behavior through a lens that merges amusement with insight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'where can i stream friends'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends .

For the time period 2005 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9864207, r-squared of 0.9730259, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
In West Virginia, Will 'Friends' Stream Drive GOP on the Scene?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected link between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and the popular Google search phrase "where can I stream Friends." While the connection between political leanings and television preferences may seem far-fetched, our research uncovers a surprisingly strong correlation.

Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2005 to 2020. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9864207 and p < 0.01, suggesting a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Despite the seemingly lighthearted nature of the search term, our analysis suggests that it may serve as a unique proxy for gauging political sentiment. The results, while unexpected, raise thought-provoking questions about the potential influence of television viewing habits on political decision-making. As for the unexpected link between 'Friends' and political affiliations, it seems that in West Virginia, political preferences and sitcom streaming may not be as distant as one might think. This correlation is 'central perk-ing' our interest in understanding the peculiar connections between cultural consumption and political behavior.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of popular culture and political behavior has long been a topic of interest among researchers. However, the connection between the television show "Friends" and the voting patterns of West Virginian Republicans may initially appear as far-fetched as a sitcom plotline. Nevertheless, our examination of Google search trends and political voting data uncovers a surprising correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena.
The idea that Google searches for "where can I stream Friends" could be related to political decision-making may seem as unexpected as Chandler's sarcastic one-liners. Yet, our analysis reveals a statistically significant association between these variables, prompting us to delve further into the potential implications of this unlikely relationship. It appears that in the realm of political affiliations, West Virginians may also be asking, "Could I BE any more Republican?"
The undertaking of this study was not merely an exercise in humor, but rather an earnest effort to explore the nuanced factors that could potentially influence electoral outcomes. While the humorous undertones of our findings cannot be ignored, the data indicates a compelling connection between the cultural consumption of a beloved sitcom and the electoral preferences of a specific demographic. It seems that in the wild and wonderful world of West Virginia politics, the influence of television re-runs may be more potent than initially presumed. This unexpected synergy between popular media and political proclivities is an intriguing area for exploration, shedding light on the intricate tapestry of human behavior and decision-making.
Through this investigation, we aim to contribute to the ongoing discourse on the multifaceted influences that shape political attitudes and actions. As we proceed to unravel the unexpected ties between sitcom streaming habits and political affiliations in West Virginia, it becomes clear that the fusion of popular culture and politics may hold a wealth of unexplored insight. Much like Ross and Rachel's on-again, off-again relationship, the connection between the search for streaming "Friends" and Republican votes in West Virginia presents a compelling and enigmatic narrative that merits further scrutiny.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends revealed a striking correlation between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for "where can I stream Friends." The correlation coefficient of 0.9864207 and an r-squared value of 0.9730259 indicated a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation suggests that as West Virginians turned to their screens to find "Friends," they also leaned toward the Grand Old Party.

The strong statistical association uncovered in this study prompts us to consider the intriguing question: could "Friends" streaming preferences serve as a clandestine predictor of political proclivities? It seems that in the Mountain State, the adage "I'll be there for you" extends beyond the confines of the iconic sitcom and into the realm of political allegiances.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually represents the robust correlation between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for "where can I stream Friends." The figure underscores the compelling alignment between these variables, providing a clear illustration of their strong relationship. One might say that the findings of this study serve as a real "Friends"-ly reminder that unexpected connections can always "pivot" into view.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'where can i stream friends'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
In West Virginia, Will 'Friends' Stream Drive GOP on the Scene?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected link between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and the popular Google search phrase "where can I stream Friends." While the connection between political leanings and television preferences may seem far-fetched, our research uncovers a surprisingly strong correlation.

Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2005 to 2020. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9864207 and p < 0.01, suggesting a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Despite the seemingly lighthearted nature of the search term, our analysis suggests that it may serve as a unique proxy for gauging political sentiment. The results, while unexpected, raise thought-provoking questions about the potential influence of television viewing habits on political decision-making. As for the unexpected link between 'Friends' and political affiliations, it seems that in West Virginia, political preferences and sitcom streaming may not be as distant as one might think. This correlation is 'central perk-ing' our interest in understanding the peculiar connections between cultural consumption and political behavior.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between political behavior and popular culture has been of perennial interest among scholars. Smith et al. (2010) examined the correlation between television viewing habits and voting patterns, revealing compelling associations between certain genres of television programming and political affiliations. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the potential influence of sitcoms on political decision-making, highlighting the subtle but impactful role of television consumption in shaping voter attitudes. However, the specific connection between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and the Google query "where can I stream Friends" has yet to receive significant scholarly attention.
Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, "Media and Politics: A Cultural Analysis" by Brown (2008) provides a comprehensive exploration of the interplay between media consumption and political preferences, shedding light on the intricate ways in which popular culture can intersect with electoral behavior. Furthermore, "Television and Politics: A Modern Perspective" by White (2012) offers a nuanced examination of the potential effects of television viewing habits on political decision-making, offering insights that may be pertinent to the current study.
On the more speculative side, "The Power of Sitcoms: Understanding the Influence of Television on Society" by Grey (2017) presents a thought-provoking analysis of the ways in which sitcoms may subtly shape societal attitudes and behaviors, hinting at the possibility of unforeseen connections between television preferences and political inclinations. Additionally, "Friends: A Cultural Phenomenon" by Black (2015) delves deeply into the enduring impact of the beloved sitcom "Friends" on popular culture, presenting a compelling argument for the show's pervasive influence.
In the fictional realm, works such as "Loyalties and Laughter: The Influence of Television on Society" by Green (2019) and "Friends and Foes: Exploring the Dynamics of Cultural Consumption" by Red (2013) offer intriguing, albeit speculative, insights into the potential interplay between sitcom streaming habits and political affiliations.
As part of the empirical research for this project, the authors have engaged in the thorough analysis of episodes of the television show "Friends," "How I Met Your Mother," and "Parks and Recreation," seeking to contextualize the sitcom-watching habits of West Virginian Republicans. These shows were selected for their thematic relevance and to provide a broader understanding of the cultural landscape that may shape the political attitudes of the demographic under study.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends revealed a striking correlation between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for "where can I stream Friends." The correlation coefficient of 0.9864207 and an r-squared value of 0.9730259 indicated a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation suggests that as West Virginians turned to their screens to find "Friends," they also leaned toward the Grand Old Party.
The strong statistical association uncovered in this study prompts us to consider the intriguing question: could "Friends" streaming preferences serve as a clandestine predictor of political proclivities? It seems that in the Mountain State, the adage "I'll be there for you" extends beyond the confines of the iconic sitcom and into the realm of political allegiances.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually represents the robust correlation between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for "where can I stream Friends." The figure underscores the compelling alignment between these variables, providing a clear illustration of their strong relationship. One might say that the findings of this study serve as a real "Friends"-ly reminder that unexpected connections can always "pivot" into view.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of the present study provide compelling evidence of a strong correlation between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for "where can I stream Friends." This unexpected association aligns with prior research that has explored the influence of television viewing habits on political inclinations. The findings underscore the intricate ways in which cultural consumption may intersect with electoral behavior, shedding light on the potential for seemingly unrelated variables to reveal underlying connections.

The robust correlation coefficient and r-squared value uncovered in this study not only reaffirm the significant relationship between television preferences and political affiliations but also introduce a novel and unconventional metric for gauging political sentiment. While the link between 'Friends' streaming searches and Republican votes in West Virginia may prompt a chuckle, it merits serious consideration in understanding the dynamics of political decision-making in the digital era.

The literature review highlighted the work of Smith et al. (2010) and Doe and Jones (2015), which explored the association between television viewing habits and voting patterns. The current study's findings aptly support and expand upon these prior investigations, emphasizing the enduring influence of television consumption on voter attitudes. The unexpected link between 'Friends' streaming and political preferences echoes the speculative insights presented in works such as "The Power of Sitcoms" by Grey (2017) and "Friends: A Cultural Phenomenon" by Black (2015), suggesting that the impact of popular culture on political behavior may be more nuanced and multifaceted than previously acknowledged.

Further scrutiny of the scatterplot (Fig. 1) provides a visual representation of the pronounced correlation between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for "where can I stream Friends." This graphic depiction not only validates the statistical findings but also serves as a subtle reminder that in the realm of academia, as in the sitcom "Friends," unexpected connections can always "pivot" into view. This statistical evidence may prompt future researchers to consider the potential use of unconventional proxies, such as entertainment preferences, in capturing political attitudes and behaviors.

In conclusion, the unanticipated connection between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and the popular television query "where can I stream Friends" raises thought-provoking questions about the malleability of political allegiances and the influence of cultural consumption on electoral decision-making. While the correlation may seem lighthearted on the surface, it underscores the need for a comprehensive understanding of the diverse factors that shape voter attitudes. As we delve deeper into the fascinating interplay between entertainment, media, and politics, we are reminded that in the world of research, as in life, unexpected connections can often yield valuable insights. As one might say, "Could I be any more surprised?"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'where can i stream friends'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
In West Virginia, Will 'Friends' Stream Drive GOP on the Scene?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected link between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and the popular Google search phrase "where can I stream Friends." While the connection between political leanings and television preferences may seem far-fetched, our research uncovers a surprisingly strong correlation.

Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2005 to 2020. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9864207 and p < 0.01, suggesting a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Despite the seemingly lighthearted nature of the search term, our analysis suggests that it may serve as a unique proxy for gauging political sentiment. The results, while unexpected, raise thought-provoking questions about the potential influence of television viewing habits on political decision-making. As for the unexpected link between 'Friends' and political affiliations, it seems that in West Virginia, political preferences and sitcom streaming may not be as distant as one might think. This correlation is 'central perk-ing' our interest in understanding the peculiar connections between cultural consumption and political behavior.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of popular culture and political behavior has long been a topic of interest among researchers. However, the connection between the television show "Friends" and the voting patterns of West Virginian Republicans may initially appear as far-fetched as a sitcom plotline. Nevertheless, our examination of Google search trends and political voting data uncovers a surprising correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena.
The idea that Google searches for "where can I stream Friends" could be related to political decision-making may seem as unexpected as Chandler's sarcastic one-liners. Yet, our analysis reveals a statistically significant association between these variables, prompting us to delve further into the potential implications of this unlikely relationship. It appears that in the realm of political affiliations, West Virginians may also be asking, "Could I BE any more Republican?"
The undertaking of this study was not merely an exercise in humor, but rather an earnest effort to explore the nuanced factors that could potentially influence electoral outcomes. While the humorous undertones of our findings cannot be ignored, the data indicates a compelling connection between the cultural consumption of a beloved sitcom and the electoral preferences of a specific demographic. It seems that in the wild and wonderful world of West Virginia politics, the influence of television re-runs may be more potent than initially presumed. This unexpected synergy between popular media and political proclivities is an intriguing area for exploration, shedding light on the intricate tapestry of human behavior and decision-making.
Through this investigation, we aim to contribute to the ongoing discourse on the multifaceted influences that shape political attitudes and actions. As we proceed to unravel the unexpected ties between sitcom streaming habits and political affiliations in West Virginia, it becomes clear that the fusion of popular culture and politics may hold a wealth of unexplored insight. Much like Ross and Rachel's on-again, off-again relationship, the connection between the search for streaming "Friends" and Republican votes in West Virginia presents a compelling and enigmatic narrative that merits further scrutiny.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends revealed a striking correlation between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for "where can I stream Friends." The correlation coefficient of 0.9864207 and an r-squared value of 0.9730259 indicated a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation suggests that as West Virginians turned to their screens to find "Friends," they also leaned toward the Grand Old Party.
The strong statistical association uncovered in this study prompts us to consider the intriguing question: could "Friends" streaming preferences serve as a clandestine predictor of political proclivities? It seems that in the Mountain State, the adage "I'll be there for you" extends beyond the confines of the iconic sitcom and into the realm of political allegiances.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually represents the robust correlation between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for "where can I stream Friends." The figure underscores the compelling alignment between these variables, providing a clear illustration of their strong relationship. One might say that the findings of this study serve as a real "Friends"-ly reminder that unexpected connections can always "pivot" into view.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has brought to light an unexpected and seemingly whimsical connection between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for "where can I stream Friends," as evidenced by the remarkably strong correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value. The findings suggest a compelling association that warrants further examination, much like the enduring question of how Ross managed to snag a successful academic career despite his penchant for monkey business.

The striking correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables raises intriguing possibilities about the interplay between popular culture and political preferences. It appears that in the unpredictable realm of West Virginian politics, the desire to stream "Friends" may align with a propensity for conservative representation. One might even say that in the Mountaineer State, the show's beloved theme song takes on a new meaning - "I'll be there for you, when the vote starts to go under."

This unexpected convergence between television viewing habits and political allegiances introduces a captivating dimension to the discourse on electoral behavior. While the connection between 'Friends' streaming and Republican votes may seem as improbable as Joey's acting career taking off, our analysis underscores the need to explore unconventional indicators of political sentiment.

Overall, the findings of this study shed light on the intricate and often perplexing interactions between cultural consumption and political decision-making. The correlations unearthed in this investigation underscore the need for further research into the potential influences of popular media on electoral outcomes. However, it is important to note that no more research is needed in this area, because, let's face it, we've already found the one where politics and sitcoms meet.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited In West Virginia, Will 'Friends' Stream Drive GOP on the Scene?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Appalachian Political Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited In West Virginia, Will 'Friends' Stream Drive GOP on the Scene?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Appalachian Political Participation and Stream Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled In West Virginia, Will 'Friends' Stream Drive GOP on the Scene? with an abstract of This study investigates the unexpected link between Republican votes for Senators in West Virginia and the popular Google search phrase "where can I stream Friends." While the connection between political leanings and television preferences may seem far-fetched, our research uncovers a surprisingly strong correlation.
Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2005 to 2020. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9864207 and p < 0.01, suggesting a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.
Despite the seemingly lighthearted nature of the search term, our analysis suggests that it may serve as a unique proxy for gauging political sentiment. The results, while unexpected, raise thought-provoking questions about the potential influence of television viewing habits on political decision-making. As for the unexpected link between 'Friends' and political affiliations, it seems that in West Virginia, political preferences and sitcom streaming may not be as distant as one might think. This correlation is 'central perk-ing' our interest in understanding the peculiar connections between cultural consumption and political behavior.

ChatGPT:

West Virginia, Republican votes, Senators, Google search, "where can I stream Friends," political leanings, television preferences, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, political sentiment, television viewing habits, political decision-making, sitcom streaming, cultural consumption, political behavior

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Republican Senators in West Virginia
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Republican Senate candidates in West Virginia
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Republican Senators in West Virginia

Google searches for 'where can i stream friends'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'where can i stream friends' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'where can i stream friends'

Correlation r = 0.9864207 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9730259 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'where can i stream friends') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Republican Senators in West Virginia) over the 6 years from 2005 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00028. 0.0002753422453847048000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0.028% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,632 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.88, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200820102012201420182020
Votes for Republican Senators in West Virginia (Total votes)254629230013240787281820269872547454
Google searches for 'where can i stream friends' (Rel. search volume)3.52.416671.916672.333332.6666717.9167




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  6. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([254629,230013,240787,281820,269872,547454,])
array_2 = np.array([3.5,2.41667,1.91667,2.33333,2.66667,17.9167,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Republican Senators in West Virginia"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'where can i stream friends'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 5109 · Black Variable ID: 26335 · Red Variable ID: 1427
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0