Report an error
Frank Lampard's Premier League goal tally correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Wyoming | r=1 | 6yrs | Yes! |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New Hampshire | r=0.99 | 6yrs | Yes! |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Kentucky | r=0.98 | 6yrs | Yes! |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Rhode Island | r=0.95 | 6yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Farmington, New Mexico | r=0.86 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania | r=0.86 | 6yrs | No |
The number of movies Leonardo DiCaprio appeared in | r=0.53 | 21yrs | No |
How provocative Steve Mould's YouTube video titles are | r=0.48 | 8yrs | Yes! |
Frank Lampard's Premier League goal tally also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)