Report an error
Andy Murray's ATP final appearances correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the 'harambe' meme | r=0.99 | 7yrs | No |
Air quality in Natchez, Mississippi | r=0.95 | 7yrs | No |
Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos | r=0.9 | 8yrs | No |
New York Times Fiction Best Sellers | r=0.85 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of craft artists in Washington | r=0.85 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Customer satisfaction with NBCNews.com | r=0.83 | 17yrs | No |
Andy Murray's ATP final appearances also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)