Report an error
GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Poland | r=0.95 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Elijah | r=0.94 | 23yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Saint Helena | r=0.89 | 22yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with Apple | r=0.82 | 22yrs | Yes! |
Total regular season games played by Nicklas Backstrom | r=0.81 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'how to immigrate to switzerland' | r=-0.83 | 19yrs | No |
GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)