Report an error
Number of goals scored by Wayne Rooney in the English Premier League correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How fun Deep Look YouTube video titles are | r=0.97 | 8yrs | No |
Air pollution in Greenwood, South Carolina | r=0.95 | 6yrs | No |
The number of transportation security screeners in Vermont | r=0.94 | 10yrs | No |
GMO use in cotton in California | r=0.89 | 19yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Uranus and Mercury | r=0.73 | 19yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Sean Bean appeared in | r=0.58 | 19yrs | No |
Hot days in New York | r=0.45 | 19yrs | No |
Number of goals scored by Wayne Rooney in the English Premier League also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)