Report an error
GMO use in corn correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Associates degrees awarded in Business and management | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
Pirate attacks globally | r=0.95 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Gabriella | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
Asthma prevalence in American children | r=0.91 | 17yrs | No |
US music album sales | r=0.89 | 16yrs | No |
Number of World of Warcraft Subscribers | r=0.83 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'can texas secede from the union' | r=0.55 | 19yrs | No |
GMO use in corn also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)