Report an error
The number of films in Sylvester Stallone's filmography correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Votes for Libertarian Senators in Oregon | r=0.92 | 6yrs | No |
| The number of millwrights in North Dakota | r=0.79 | 19yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'why do we have daylight savings time' | r=0.75 | 19yrs | Yes! |
| Hot days in Paris | r=0.74 | 8yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'where to buy crutches' | r=0.7 | 18yrs | Yes! |
| US household spending on medical supplies | r=0.65 | 23yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica' | r=0.64 | 19yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'cat memes' | r=0.61 | 19yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'lost my wallet' | r=0.56 | 16yrs | No |
| Wind power generated in Lithuania | r=0.54 | 18yrs | No |
| Jet fuel used in Oman | r=0.47 | 42yrs | No |
| Air pollution in Fremont, Ohio | r=-0.02 | 7yrs | Yes! |
The number of films in Sylvester Stallone's filmography also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)