Report an error
Ticket sales for Cleveland Guardians games correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Bailey | r=0.93 | 45yrs | Yes! |
Kerosene used in South Korea | r=0.89 | 40yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Engineering technologies | r=0.88 | 8yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sierra | r=0.87 | 45yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Ohio | r=0.86 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Austin | r=0.86 | 45yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Cameron | r=0.82 | 45yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Julia | r=0.81 | 45yrs | No |
Ticket sales for Cleveland Guardians games also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)