Report an error
Apple's annual net income correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Inflation in the US | r=0.97 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'ice bath' | r=0.97 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Rory | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
The number of tax preparers in Arizona | r=0.96 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Butter consumption | r=0.95 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Bennett | r=0.95 | 18yrs | No |
The number of electrical engineers in California | r=0.94 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'lost my wallet' | r=0.92 | 16yrs | No |
Tesla's stock price (TSLA) | r=0.91 | 12yrs | No |
Chipotle Mexican Grill's stock price (CMG) | r=0.91 | 16yrs | No |
Annual revenue from Disney movies | r=0.73 | 10yrs | No |
Apple's annual net income also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)