Report an error
Popularity of the first name Georgina correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Powerball lottery numbers | r=0.94 | 13yrs | No |
Total value of all $50 bills printed | r=0.93 | 12yrs | No |
Google searches for 'reddit' | r=0.85 | 15yrs | No |
Air pollution in Ithaca | r=0.71 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Annual U.S. inflation rate | r=0.65 | 33yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Georgina also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)