Report an error
Total annual sales of Ford Motors in the United States correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Antonia | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Tennessee | r=0.91 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Hannah | r=0.9 | 23yrs | No |
Kerosene used in South Korea | r=0.87 | 23yrs | No |
The number of carpet installers in California | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No |
Air pollution in Pocatello, Idaho | r=0.83 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Mobile, Alabama | r=0.81 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Sonora, California | r=0.8 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Total annual sales of Ford Motors in the United States also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)