Report an error
Popularity of the first name Beau correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Associates degrees awarded in Psychology | r=1 | 11yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Bangladesh | r=1 | 25yrs | Yes! |
| Nuclear power generation in China | r=0.99 | 30yrs | Yes! |
| The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
| DTE Energy Company's stock price (DTE) | r=0.99 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Wind power generated in Sweden | r=0.99 | 39yrs | No |
| Brown-Forman's stock price (BF.B) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Number of websites on the internet | r=0.98 | 28yrs | Yes! |
| McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
| Gasoline pumped in Mali | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Beau also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)