Report an error
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in California correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Hydopower energy generated in Brazil | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.98 | 8yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Australia | r=0.98 | 11yrs | Yes! |
US household spending on pets, toys, and hobbies | r=0.98 | 6yrs | No |
Inflation in the US | r=0.97 | 8yrs | No |
Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Moshe | r=0.93 | 12yrs | No |
US Annual Tax Revenue | r=0.92 | 12yrs | No |
American cheese consumption | r=0.9 | 8yrs | No |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in California also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)