Report an error
Kerosene used in Egypt correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Ross | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
Burglaries in New York | r=0.98 | 37yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Alesha | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Katie | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
Burglaries in Florida | r=0.96 | 37yrs | No |
Arson in California | r=0.96 | 37yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Felicia | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Christopher | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Elizabeth | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No |
Air pollution in Steamboat Springs, Colorado | r=0.94 | 37yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' | r=0.93 | 18yrs | No |
The number of CEOs in California | r=0.93 | 19yrs | No |
The number of movies Florence Pugh appeared in | r=0.89 | 7yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Egypt also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)