Report an error
Electricity generation in Cambodia correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in Engineering | r=1 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'smol' | r=0.98 | 18yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'avocado toast' | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
| The number of radiation therapists in Texas | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme | r=0.95 | 16yrs | No |
| Ryanair Holdings' stock price (RYAAY) | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Cambodia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)