Report an error
Motor vehicle thefts in Texas correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Average views of MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Psychology | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon | r=0.94 | 36yrs | No |
Cottage cheese consumption | r=0.93 | 32yrs | Yes! |
The number of telephone operators in Texas | r=0.91 | 19yrs | No |
Tesla's stock price (TSLA) | r=0.91 | 12yrs | No |
Disney movies released | r=0.88 | 23yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls' | r=0.85 | 15yrs | No |
Motor vehicle thefts in Texas also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)