Report an error
Motor vehicle thefts in New York correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Corey | r=0.98 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Brittany | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Mai | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Stefan | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Egypt | r=0.95 | 37yrs | No |
Portion of all US dairy skim-solids allocated to the production of fluid beverage milk | r=0.93 | 22yrs | No |
Per capita consumption of margarine | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on books | r=0.9 | 23yrs | No |
Disney movies released | r=0.89 | 23yrs | No |
The number of brokerage clerks in New York | r=0.86 | 20yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Italy | r=0.7 | 38yrs | No |
Air pollution in New York City | r=0.69 | 38yrs | No |
Motor vehicle thefts in New York also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)