Report an error
Motor vehicle thefts in Michigan correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Cedric | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Norway | r=0.97 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Sean | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Education | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon | r=0.95 | 36yrs | Yes! |
Milk consumption | r=0.94 | 32yrs | Yes! |
Viewership count for Days of Our Lives | r=0.94 | 37yrs | No |
Ice cream consumption | r=0.91 | 32yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Architecture | r=0.88 | 10yrs | No |
Motor vehicle thefts in Michigan also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)