Report an error
Burglaries in Oklahoma correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Christopher | r=0.97 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Oklahoma | r=0.92 | 18yrs | No |
US household spending on mortgage interest and charges | r=0.92 | 23yrs | No |
Cottage cheese consumption | r=0.92 | 32yrs | Yes! |
The number of executive administrative assistants in Oklahoma | r=0.91 | 13yrs | No |
The number of recreational therapists in Oklahoma | r=0.85 | 20yrs | No |
Burglaries in Oklahoma also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)