Report an error
Burglaries in Montana correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How insightful LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are | r=0.98 | 8yrs | No |
Viewership count for Days of Our Lives | r=0.93 | 37yrs | Yes! |
Kerosene used in Cuba | r=0.92 | 37yrs | No |
Frozen yogurt consumption | r=0.91 | 32yrs | No |
Milk consumption | r=0.83 | 32yrs | No |
US Tobacco Production | r=0.8 | 23yrs | No |
Cottage cheese consumption | r=0.78 | 32yrs | No |
Points Scored by Winning Team in Super Bowl | r=0.53 | 38yrs | No |
Super Bowl Champion's Winning Score | r=0.48 | 38yrs | No |
Burglaries in Montana also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)