Report an error
Arson in South Dakota correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total comments on Vihart's YouTube videos | r=0.92 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos | r=0.92 | 12yrs | No |
Total likes of Vihart's YouTube videos | r=0.91 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' | r=0.89 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'Titanic' | r=0.88 | 15yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'slenderman' meme | r=0.6 | 14yrs | No |
Arson in South Dakota also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)