Report an error
Arson in New Hampshire correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' | r=0.95 | 11yrs | Yes! |
GMO use in cotton | r=0.93 | 23yrs | Yes! |
US dairy skim solids used to produce milk fat and skim solids byproduct fluid beverage milk | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Criminal justice and corrections | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
The number of postmasters in New Hampshire | r=0.9 | 20yrs | No |
US household spending on mortgage interest and charges | r=0.89 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jermaine | r=0.87 | 38yrs | No |
The number of elementary school teachers in New Hampshire | r=0.86 | 20yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and the Sun | r=0.78 | 38yrs | No |
Arson in New Hampshire also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)