Report an error
Arson in Illinois correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Lamar | r=0.94 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Pierre | r=0.91 | 38yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Architecture | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Gerard | r=0.91 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Roxanne | r=0.9 | 38yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in French Polynesia | r=0.89 | 37yrs | Yes! |
Master's degrees awarded in linguistics | r=0.89 | 10yrs | No |
Average number of milk cows in the United States | r=0.81 | 38yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and the moon | r=0.68 | 38yrs | No |
Arson in Illinois also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)