Report an error
Customer satisfaction with AT&T correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Business | r=0.96 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Associates degrees awarded in Music and dance | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
How cool MrBeast's YouTube video titles are | r=0.93 | 10yrs | No |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Texas | r=0.9 | 6yrs | No |
The number of accountants and auditors in South Carolina | r=0.89 | 18yrs | No |
How good Mark Rober YouTube video titles are | r=0.87 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Air quality in Jackson | r=0.85 | 18yrs | No |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Georgia | r=0.76 | 7yrs | No |
The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in | r=0.63 | 14yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with AT&T also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)