Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Cognizant Technology Solutions' stock price (CTSH) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Annual US household spending on rented dwellings | r=0.98 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Food spending in Arkansas | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Roman | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Uranus | r=0.95 | 22yrs | Yes! |
Adidas Group's Global Net Sales | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
American cheese consumption | r=0.91 | 20yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Saturn and the Sun | r=0.9 | 22yrs | No |
Cognizant Technology Solutions' stock price (CTSH) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)