Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Cenovus Energy's stock price (CVE) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Associates degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies | r=0.98 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Master's degrees awarded in literature | r=0.96 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history | r=0.93 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Saturn and Jupiter | r=0.93 | 14yrs | No |
Google searches for 'daylight savings time' | r=0.89 | 14yrs | No |
Cenovus Energy's stock price (CVE) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)