Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Enbridge's stock price (ENB) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Hadley | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to make baby' | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Michigan | r=0.92 | 22yrs | Yes! |
US average milk-fat content of whey products (net) | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and the Sun | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and the Sun | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and Earth | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
GMO use in corn | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
Yogurt consumption | r=0.9 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'cute cats' | r=0.86 | 20yrs | No |
Enbridge's stock price (ENB) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)