Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Sony Group's stock price (SONY) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Average views of MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.97 | 12yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Dario | r=0.9 | 21yrs | Yes! |
The number of real estate agents in Montana | r=0.89 | 20yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on processed fruits | r=0.86 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Massachusetts | r=0.8 | 7yrs | No |
How 'hip and with it' MrBeast's YouTube video titles are | r=0.71 | 12yrs | No |
Sony Group's stock price (SONY) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)