Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'i cant fall asleep' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Oregon | r=0.97 | 6yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in Idaho | r=0.94 | 6yrs | No |
The number of transportation security screeners in West Virginia | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
The number of nurse anesthetists in North Dakota | r=0.89 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Business and management | r=0.89 | 11yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.8 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'trollface' meme | r=0.8 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'gangnam style' meme | r=0.77 | 12yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'scumbag steve' meme | r=0.72 | 18yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Business operations | r=0.71 | 11yrs | No |
US household spending on cereals and bakery products | r=0.61 | 19yrs | No |
Kerosene used in North Korea | r=0.59 | 18yrs | No |
Shark attacks in the United States | r=0.5 | 19yrs | No |
The number of movies Tom Hanks appeared in | r=0.45 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i cant fall asleep' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)