Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'white house hotline' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Engineering technologies | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Patents granted to Toyota | r=0.94 | 12yrs | No |
Patents granted to Samsung Electronics | r=0.93 | 12yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme | r=0.93 | 18yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Rwanda | r=0.9 | 15yrs | No |
Patents granted to Hyundai | r=0.9 | 8yrs | No |
How professional-sounding MrBeast's YouTube video titles are | r=0.89 | 12yrs | No |
Hot days in Paris | r=0.88 | 10yrs | No |
Average SAT score in writing | r=0.88 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme | r=0.88 | 18yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in journalism | r=0.88 | 10yrs | No |
Total views on Technology Connections YouTube videos | r=0.86 | 9yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'spiderman pointing' meme | r=0.86 | 18yrs | No |
The number of agricultural sciences teachers in Illinois | r=0.82 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos | r=0.79 | 15yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Leland | r=-0.88 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'white house hotline' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)