Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'yeet' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the 'surprised pikachu' meme | r=0.94 | 18yrs | No |
Boeing's stock price (BA) | r=0.94 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Gabon | r=0.92 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'press f to pay respects' meme | r=0.89 | 18yrs | Yes! |
The number of wastewater treatment plant operators in New York | r=0.89 | 13yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Namibia | r=0.88 | 16yrs | No |
Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America | r=0.87 | 19yrs | No |
The number of consultants in Nevada | r=0.87 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'we live in a society' meme | r=0.87 | 18yrs | Yes! |
The number of umpires and referees in Michigan | r=0.85 | 19yrs | Yes! |
The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington | r=0.82 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'florida man' meme | r=0.81 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'its wednesday my dudes' meme | r=0.8 | 18yrs | No |
Average viewer count per season of "How I Met Your Mother" | r=0.72 | 9yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'weird flex but ok' meme | r=0.65 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'yeet' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)