Report an error
Master's degrees awarded in Visual and performing arts correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of cashiers in Vermont | r=0.98 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of garbage collectors in Wisconsin | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
The number of hosts and hostesses in restaurants in Hawaii | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
The number of housekeepers in Arkansas | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of funeral attendants in Florida | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Victoria | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
The number of lifeguards and ski patrol in New York | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Benjamin | r=0.92 | 10yrs | No |
The number of accountants and auditors in District of Columbia | r=0.92 | 10yrs | No |
Air quality in Bishop, California | r=0.88 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Jupiter and Mercury | r=0.87 | 10yrs | No |
The number of dishwashers in Texas | r=0.81 | 10yrs | No |
Number of films featuring Tom Hanks | r=0.77 | 10yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Visual and performing arts also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)