Report an error
Master's degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of medical equipment repairers in Oregon | r=0.93 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of drywall and ceiling tile installers in Texas | r=0.91 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of wellhead pumpers in Ohio | r=0.89 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Ford Motor Company's stock price (F) | r=0.81 | 10yrs | No |
Snowfall in New York | r=0.8 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Rainfall in San Francisco | r=0.71 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of printing press operators in Rhode Island | r=0.68 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to make baby' | r=0.65 | 10yrs | No |
General Electric's stock price (GE) | r=0.62 | 10yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)