Report an error
Master's degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Solar power generated in India | r=1 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'sushi near me' | r=0.99 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'cold shower' | r=0.98 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Agilent Technologies' stock price (A) | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'spiderman pointing' meme | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Rhiannon | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
The number of fire inspectors in Iowa | r=0.88 | 8yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)