Report an error
Number of public school students in 10th grade correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.95 | 24yrs | No |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Louisiana | r=0.94 | 8yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'climate change' | r=0.9 | 15yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.9 | 33yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Joaquin | r=0.89 | 33yrs | No |
Internet Access Rate among US Citizens | r=0.86 | 23yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Missouri | r=0.77 | 32yrs | No |
Number of public school students in 10th grade also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)