Report an error
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the 'all your base' meme | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
The number of bill collectors in Colorado | r=0.98 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'download firefox' | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of physicists in Hawaii | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'call of duty' | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Arizona | r=0.87 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'overly attached girlfriend' meme | r=0.87 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'can texas secede from the union' | r=0.62 | 10yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)