Report an error
Associates degrees awarded in Music and dance correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Solar power generated in Costa Rica | r=0.99 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Total comments on MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Eliza | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
Total views on MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Customer satisfaction with AT&T | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
The number of police officers in Missouri | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
Air quality in Los Angeles | r=0.89 | 11yrs | No |
The number of production, planning, and expediting clerks in Oregon | r=0.78 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'florida man' meme | r=0.64 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Music and dance also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)