Report an error
Culinary Associates degrees awarded correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Burglaries in West Virginia | r=0.98 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| The number of computer programmers in California | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
| The number of bill collectors in California | r=0.97 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Abigail | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Alexandria | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
| Passing attempts by Drew Brees per NFL season | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
| Robberies in the US | r=0.95 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| The number of geoscientists in Alabama | r=0.92 | 11yrs | No |
| The marriage rate in Nebraska | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'easy bake oven' | r=0.88 | 11yrs | No |
| Number of Slot Machines in Nevada | r=0.87 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'batman' | r=0.86 | 11yrs | No |
| Customer satisfaction with Dollar General | r=0.86 | 10yrs | No |
| Season wins for the New York Jets | r=0.62 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'can texas secede from the union' | r=0.6 | 11yrs | No |
| The number of bartenders in Utah | r=0.28 | 11yrs | No |
Culinary Associates degrees awarded also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)