Report an error
UFO sightings in Vermont correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Aubree | r=0.9 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.89 | 37yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Barre, Vermont | r=0.87 | 17yrs | No |
Global plane crashes | r=0.78 | 47yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'aint nobody got time for that' meme | r=0.76 | 16yrs | No |
Air pollution in Rutland, Vermont | r=0.74 | 34yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Vermont also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)