Report an error
UFO sightings in Wisconsin correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Kenzie | r=0.91 | 46yrs | Yes! |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.88 | 46yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin | r=0.88 | 23yrs | No |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Wisconsin | r=0.85 | 12yrs | No |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Wisconsin | r=0.81 | 12yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.8 | 43yrs | Yes! |
UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count | r=0.75 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Wisconsin also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)