Report an error
UFO sightings in Georgia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Camden | r=0.95 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.94 | 37yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Avery | r=0.94 | 47yrs | No |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Georgia | r=0.93 | 12yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Zoey | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Thailand | r=0.91 | 42yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.86 | 47yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.85 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Patents granted to Kia | r=0.78 | 11yrs | No |
The number of movies Meryl Streep appeared in | r=0.72 | 47yrs | No |
Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains' | r=0.7 | 18yrs | No |
The number of movies Chris Evans appeared in | r=0.66 | 22yrs | No |
The number of movies Tom Hanks appeared in | r=0.64 | 42yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Georgia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)