Report an error
UFO sightings in Michigan correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Mason | r=0.94 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Sophia | r=0.94 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.93 | 37yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Annabel | r=0.92 | 47yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Ecuador | r=0.9 | 42yrs | Yes! |
New York Times Fiction Best Sellers | r=0.89 | 40yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Maya | r=0.86 | 47yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Saturn | r=0.85 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.79 | 33yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Alexa | r=0.73 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Michigan also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)