Report an error
Percentage of Americans with social media profiles correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Geothermal power generated in New Zealand | r=0.99 | 14yrs | No |
The number of firefighters in North Carolina | r=0.99 | 12yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Parks & Recreation | r=0.98 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Emmett | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and Mercury | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Cabo Verde | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and Earth | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and the Sun | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Charlotte | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Uzbekistan | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
Air quality in Utica, New York | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in India | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
Google searches for 'instagram' | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
How insightful SmarterEveryDay YouTube video titles are | r=0.95 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Average household spend on Christmas Gifts | r=0.88 | 14yrs | No |
The number of movies Anya Taylor-Joy appeared in | r=0.85 | 8yrs | No |
Percentage of Americans with social media profiles also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)