Download png, svg
Check back later, or email me if you'd enjoy seeing this work in real-time.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
The number of movies Christopher Lee appeared inSource: The Movie DB
Additional Info: End of the World (1977); Dracula and Son (1976); Jinnah (1998); Night of the Eagles (1989); Howling II: Stirba - Werewolf Bitch (1985); Soul Music (1997); Arabian Adventure (1979); A Feast At Midnight (1994); Witchcraft (1991); Sherlock Holmes: Incident at Victoria Falls (1992); Funny Man (1994); Sherlock Holmes and the Leading Lady (1991); Meatcleaver Massacre (1977); The Fall of the House Of Usher (2012); The Many Faces of Christopher Lee (1996); The Keeper (1976); Welcome to the Discworld (1996); Murder Story (1989); Albino (1976); Extraordinary Tales (2013); Christopher Lee - Gentleman des Grauens (2010); The Disputation (1986); The Occult: Mysteries Of The Supernatural (1977); Fear in the Dark (1991); Tasmanian Devil: The Fast and Furious Life of Errol Flynn (2007); The Many Faces of Sherlock Holmes (1985); A Century of Science Fiction (1996); The Nightmare Before Christmas: The Original Poem (2008); In Search of Dracula (1975); Christopher Lee: A Legacy of Horror and Terror (2012); The Mummy (1998); Errol Flynn: Portrait of a Swashbuckler (1983); Whales of Atlantis: In Search of Moby Dick (2003); Amazon Trek: In Search of Vanishing Secrets (2007); The Devil's Island: Journey Into Jungle Alcatraz (2001); Dracula vs. Vampir (2012); Faces of Death (2023); The Many Faces of Dracula (2000); To the Devil a Daughter (1976); Flesh and Blood: The Hammer Heritage of Horror (1994); Dark Mission: Flowers of Evil (1988); Starship Invasions (1977); An Eye for an Eye (1981); Return from Witch Mountain (1978); House of the Long Shadows (1983); The Return of Captain Invincible (1983); Jaguar Lives! (1979); Evil Stalks This House (1981); Necessary Evil: Super-Villains of DC Comics (2013); The Care of Time (1990); Enzo Ferrari 1898 - 1988 (2012); Drácula Barcelona (2017); The Boy Who Left Home to Find Out About the Shivers (1984); New Magic (1983); Hammer: The Studio That Dripped Blood (1987); Drácula en la Hammer (2003); The Wicker Man Enigma (2001); Charles & Diana: A Royal Love Story (1982); Beloved Count (2007); Bloody Jess (2007); Perversion Stories (2002); Fanex Files: Hammer Films (2008); Beauty and the Beast (1992); Ex-S: The Wicker Man (1998); Moses (1995); Circle of Iron (1978); Triage (2009); Safari 3000 (1982); The Wicker Tree (2011); Once Upon a Spy (1980); The Rosebud Beach Hotel (1984); The Girl from Nagasaki (2013); Mask of Murder (1985); The Trail of Dracula (2013); From Puppets to Pixels: Digital Characters in 'Episode II' (2002); Burnt Offering: The Cult of The Wicker Man (2001); The World of Hammer: Dracula and the Undead (1994); The Complete Bob Wilkins Creature Features (2012); In the Footsteps of Sherlock Holmes (1996); Ian Fleming: 007's Creator (2000); The Rank Charm School (1982); A Pleasant Terror: The Life and Ghosts of M.R. James (1995); To the Devil... The Death of Hammer (2002); Film Collectibles: Capturing Movie Memories (2003); Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones (2002); Season of the Witch (2011); Treasure Island (1990); Caravans (1978); Crimson Rivers II: Angels of the Apocalypse (2004); Bear Island (1979); The Resident (2011); Killer Force (1976); Captain America II: Death Too Soon (1979); Double Vision (1992); Angels in Notting Hill (2015); Journey of Honor (1991); The Adventures of Young Indiana Jones: Adventures in the Secret Service (1999); The Bengal Lancers! (1984); Cyber Eden (1992); In Search of Dracula with Jonathan Ross (1996); The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001); Death Train (1993); The Heavy (2010); The Rainbow Thief (1994); Mio in the Land of Faraway (1987); The Girl (1987); Honeymoon Academy (1989); Desperate Moves (1980); Face of Unity (2014); The Pirate (1978); Un métier de seigneur (1986); Gremlins 2: The New Batch (1990); 1941 (1979); Star Wars: The Clone Wars (2008); Boogie Woogie (2009); The Adventures of Greyfriars Bobby (2005); The Salamander (1981); Peter Cushing: In His Own Words (2020); The Last Unicorn (1982); Hugo (2011); The Stupids (1996); Burke & Hare (2010); The Passage (1979); Police Academy: Mission to Moscow (1994); Olympus Force: The Key (1988); The Man Who Ruined the British Film Industry (1996); Shoot the Moon: The Making of 'Hugo' (2012); The Return of the Musketeers (1989); Witch's Dungeon: 40 Years of Chills (2006); Hollywood Chinese (2007); Massarati and the Brain (1982); Inside 'The Man with the Golden Gun' (2000); Back to Black: The Making of Dracula Prince of Darkness (2012); Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (2005); Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith (2005); Corpse Bride (2005); Glorious 39 (2009); Tale of the Mummy (1998); Everything or Nothing (2012); In Search of James Bond with Jonathan Ross (1995); Rhapsody of Fire: Visions from the Enchanted Lands (2007); The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002); Airport '77 (1977); Dark Shadows (2012); Night Train to Lisbon (2013); Dark Glamour: The Blood and Guts of Hammer Productions (2017); Top Gear: 50 Years of Bond Cars (2012); Dracula Unearthed (2022); The Golden Compass (2007); Jocks (1986); The Miser (1990); Quest for the Ring (2001); Sleepy Hollow: Behind the Legend (2000); Creepy Classics (1987); Serial (1980); The Story of Star Wars (2004); Fifty Shades of Erotica (2015); Beyond the Movie: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001); Frankenweenie (2012); Famous Monster: Forrest J Ackerman (2007); Sleepy Hollow (1999); The French Revolution (1989); Alice in Wonderland (2010); Ein Leben wie im Flug (2007); The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012); The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies (2014); A Passage to Middle-earth: Making of 'Lord of the Rings' (2001); R2-D2: Beneath the Dome (2001); The Horror Show (1979); Oops, Those Hollywood Bloopers! (1982); Halloween: The Inside Story (2010); Kingdom Hearts 358/2 Days (2013); Best Ever Bond (2002); The Making of The Fellowship of the Ring (2002); Bond Girls Are Forever (2002)
See what else correlates with The number of movies Christopher Lee appeared in
Popularity of the 'gangnam style' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'gangnam style' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.
See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'gangnam style' meme
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9520427 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Popularity of the 'gangnam style' meme) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of movies Christopher Lee appeared in) over the 12 years from 2012 through 2023.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.4E-8. 0.0000000637142535199109600000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 6.4E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 15,695,075 random variables You don't actually need 15 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.91, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
The number of movies Christopher Lee appeared in (Movie appearances) | 12 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Popularity of the 'gangnam style' meme (Relative popularity) | 37.6 | 13.9167 | 3.25 | 2.08333 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([12,6,2,2,0,2,0,0,1,0,1,1,])
array_2 = np.array([37.6,13.9167,3.25,2.08333,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,])
array_1_name = "The number of movies Christopher Lee appeared in"
array_2_name = "Popularity of the 'gangnam style' meme"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only The number of movies Christopher Lee appeared in
- Line chart for only Popularity of the 'gangnam style' meme
Your correlation rating is out of this world!
Correlation ID: 9813 · Black Variable ID: 26548 · Red Variable ID: 25108