about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,962 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and the second variable is The number of pest control workers in District of Columbia.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people attempted to construct their own lightsabers, they unwittingly attracted a higher number of pesky creatures, leading to an unexpected demand for pest control workers in the District of Columbia. Remember, with great power comes great bug-sponsibility!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] A bustling downtown street in the District of Columbia is depicted. In the foreground, a group of people are gathered outside a hardware store, frantically typing on their phones. They are shown searching "how to build a lightsaber" on Google. Nearby, a team of pest control workers in their uniforms are setting up traps and spraying insect repellent around the area, combatting the surge of pesky creatures drawn by the bright lightsabers. The light pouring from the store's windows illuminates the scene and adds depth to the setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and The number of pest control workers in District of Columbia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Magic realism A photo-realistic image Data cyber art Hyper-realistic Glitch art
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and The number of pest control workers in District of Columbia, in the following situation: As more people attempted to construct their own lightsabers, they unwittingly attracted a higher number of pesky creatures, leading to an unexpected demand for pest control workers in the District of Columbia. Remember, with great power comes great bug-sponsibility!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling downtown street in the District of Columbia, a group of people gather outside a hardware store, furiously typing on their phones as they search "how to build a lightsaber" on Google. Meanwhile, nearby, a team of pest control workers in their uniforms are setting up traps and spraying insect repellent around the area to combat the sudden surge of pesky creatures that have been drawn by the bright lightsabers.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling downtown street in the District of Columbia, a group of people gather outside a hardware store, furiously typing on their phones as they search "how to build a lightsaber" on Google. Meanwhile, nearby, a team of pest control workers in their uniforms are setting up traps and spraying insect repellent around the area to combat the sudden surge of pesky creatures that have been drawn by the bright lightsabers. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] A bustling downtown street in the District of Columbia is depicted. In the foreground, a group of people are gathered outside a hardware store, frantically typing on their phones. They are shown searching "how to build a lightsaber" on Google. Nearby, a team of pest control workers in their uniforms are setting up traps and spraying insect repellent around the area, combatting the surge of pesky creatures drawn by the bright lightsabers. The light pouring from the store's windows illuminates the scene and adds depth to the setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in how to build a lightsaber (Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber') positively influenced The number of pest control workers in District of Columbia. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Shining a Light on Lightsaber Longings: Analyzing the Association Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Pest Control Employment in the District of Columbia

The Journal of Unconventional Interdisciplinary Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and The number of pest control workers in District of Columbia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9590726 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Shining a Light on Lightsaber Longings: Analyzing the Association Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Pest Control Employment in the District of Columbia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. With a touch of humor and a sprinkling of data analysis, we investigate this peculiar nexus and unearth some surprising findings.

In a quest to shed light on this curious connection, our research team utilized data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employing correlation analysis, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9590726 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2019. This statistical association surpasses the deftness of even the most skilled Jedi!

Our findings suggest that as Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" rise, there is a parallel increase in the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. The exact mechanism underlying this link remains shrouded in mystery, but it certainly adds an electrifying twist to the world of pest control and lightsaber lore.

These results may elicit a raised eyebrow or a knowing smile, much like the allure of a certain fatherly pun. This study offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking addition to the realm of academic inquiry, demonstrating that even the most unexpected connections can harbor enlightening insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and The number of pest control workers in District of Columbia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shining a Light on Lightsaber Longings: Analyzing the Association Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Pest Control Employment in the District of Columbia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. With a touch of humor and a sprinkling of data analysis, we investigate this peculiar nexus and unearth some surprising findings.

In a quest to shed light on this curious connection, our research team utilized data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employing correlation analysis, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9590726 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2019. This statistical association surpasses the deftness of even the most skilled Jedi!

Our findings suggest that as Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" rise, there is a parallel increase in the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. The exact mechanism underlying this link remains shrouded in mystery, but it certainly adds an electrifying twist to the world of pest control and lightsaber lore.

These results may elicit a raised eyebrow or a knowing smile, much like the allure of a certain fatherly pun. This study offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking addition to the realm of academic inquiry, demonstrating that even the most unexpected connections can harbor enlightening insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the famous saying goes, "The force is strong with this one." In a galaxy not so far, far away, we embark on an illuminating quest to explore the unexpected ties between Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. This inquiry promises to unveil insights that are truly out of this world – and perhaps shed some light on pest control practices in the process.

The intersection of lightsaber construction curiosity and pest management prowess may at first glance appear as distant as the moons of Endor, but our analysis brings forth a startling connection that is sure to captivate both Jedi enthusiasts and entomology aficionados alike.

A long time ago, in a statistical analysis far, far away, our research team set out to investigate the fluctuating tides of lightsaber-related inquiries and their seemingly synchronized dance with the ebb and flow of pest control labor forces. As we delved into this unusual confluence, the data hinted at an unexpected correlation that might tempt even the most resistant astromech droid to emit a wry whistle of surprise.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and The number of pest control workers in District of Columbia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shining a Light on Lightsaber Longings: Analyzing the Association Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Pest Control Employment in the District of Columbia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. With a touch of humor and a sprinkling of data analysis, we investigate this peculiar nexus and unearth some surprising findings.

In a quest to shed light on this curious connection, our research team utilized data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employing correlation analysis, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9590726 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2019. This statistical association surpasses the deftness of even the most skilled Jedi!

Our findings suggest that as Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" rise, there is a parallel increase in the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. The exact mechanism underlying this link remains shrouded in mystery, but it certainly adds an electrifying twist to the world of pest control and lightsaber lore.

These results may elicit a raised eyebrow or a knowing smile, much like the allure of a certain fatherly pun. This study offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking addition to the realm of academic inquiry, demonstrating that even the most unexpected connections can harbor enlightening insights.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the famous saying goes, "The force is strong with this one." In a galaxy not so far, far away, we embark on an illuminating quest to explore the unexpected ties between Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. This inquiry promises to unveil insights that are truly out of this world – and perhaps shed some light on pest control practices in the process.
The intersection of lightsaber construction curiosity and pest management prowess may at first glance appear as distant as the moons of Endor, but our analysis brings forth a startling connection that is sure to captivate both Jedi enthusiasts and entomology aficionados alike.
A long time ago, in a statistical analysis far, far away, our research team set out to investigate the fluctuating tides of lightsaber-related inquiries and their seemingly synchronized dance with the ebb and flow of pest control labor forces. As we delved into this unusual confluence, the data hinted at an unexpected correlation that might tempt even the most resistant astromech droid to emit a wry whistle of surprise.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find a robust correlation between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. This initial revelation piques our interest and prompts further exploration into this quizzical enigma.

However, as we delve deeper into the research surrounding lightsaber construction and pest control, we encounter "Doe's in Pests and Fandom," which provides a whimsical yet compelling analysis of the cultural impact of lightsaber enthusiasms on the pest control industry. The authors aptly note that the energy surrounding lightsaber construction may inadvertently attract both aspiring Jedi and determined pest exterminators.

To shed further light on this unexpected relationship, "Jones's Entomology and Intergalactic Adventures" presents an intriguing hypothesis, suggesting that the allure of lightsaber craftsmanship parallels a surge in interest in pest control careers. The author humorously dubs this phenomenon the "Luke Skywalker Effect," igniting a playful yet thought-provoking discourse on the intersection of fictional weaponry and real-world pest management.

Moving beyond academic literature, "The Ultimate Guide to Lightsaber Construction" by A. J. Womp Rat and "Pest Control Strategies for Urban Environments" by Dr. E. W. Ang suggest a curious overlap in the enthusiasts of lightsaber fabrication and those devoted to tackling urban pests. The unexpected pairing of these subject matters elicits a chuckle and encourages a whimsical examination of their potential interplay.

Moreover, works of fiction such as "The Exterminator Strikes Back" by G. Lucas and "The Phantom Pest Control" by G. R. R. Marten provide a fantastical backdrop to our investigation, highlighting the pervasive presence of pest control themes in popular culture. These literary indulgences serve as a reminder that even the most surreal scenarios can influence real-world phenomena.

In the realm of social media, an anonymous post humorously mused that the surge in interest in lightsaber construction tutorials mirrors the rising demand for pest control services, postulating that perhaps lightsaber enthusiasts seek to channel their prowess towards vanquishing pests. Such informal observations add a touch of levity to our inquiry and prompt us to consider the more whimsical aspects of this peculiar connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and The number of pest control workers in District of Columbia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2004 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shining a Light on Lightsaber Longings: Analyzing the Association Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Pest Control Employment in the District of Columbia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. With a touch of humor and a sprinkling of data analysis, we investigate this peculiar nexus and unearth some surprising findings.

In a quest to shed light on this curious connection, our research team utilized data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employing correlation analysis, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9590726 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2019. This statistical association surpasses the deftness of even the most skilled Jedi!

Our findings suggest that as Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" rise, there is a parallel increase in the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. The exact mechanism underlying this link remains shrouded in mystery, but it certainly adds an electrifying twist to the world of pest control and lightsaber lore.

These results may elicit a raised eyebrow or a knowing smile, much like the allure of a certain fatherly pun. This study offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking addition to the realm of academic inquiry, demonstrating that even the most unexpected connections can harbor enlightening insights.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the famous saying goes, "The force is strong with this one." In a galaxy not so far, far away, we embark on an illuminating quest to explore the unexpected ties between Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. This inquiry promises to unveil insights that are truly out of this world – and perhaps shed some light on pest control practices in the process.
The intersection of lightsaber construction curiosity and pest management prowess may at first glance appear as distant as the moons of Endor, but our analysis brings forth a startling connection that is sure to captivate both Jedi enthusiasts and entomology aficionados alike.
A long time ago, in a statistical analysis far, far away, our research team set out to investigate the fluctuating tides of lightsaber-related inquiries and their seemingly synchronized dance with the ebb and flow of pest control labor forces. As we delved into this unusual confluence, the data hinted at an unexpected correlation that might tempt even the most resistant astromech droid to emit a wry whistle of surprise.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mysterious connection between Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia, our research team embarked on a data-driven odyssey across the digital realm. We utilized data from Google Trends to capture the fluctuations in search interest for lightsaber construction techniques from 2004 to 2019. After donning our metaphorical Jedi robes, we channeled the power of the Force – or rather, the power of statistical analysis – to examine the temporal trends in these searches.

In parallel, we harnessed the authoritative records of the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the ebbs and flows of pest control employment in the District of Columbia over the same time period. These data sets were then subjected to meticulous scrutiny, as we navigated through the labyrinthine complexities of statistical analysis with the finesse of a lightsaber duel.

Upon encountering the formidable challenge of establishing a causal relationship, we wielded the mighty sword of correlation analysis. This analytical weapon enabled us to quantify the strength and direction of the association between lightsaber-related searches and pest control employment levels. With a wave of our methodological wand, we cast the spell of statistical significance to determine the robustness of this unearthed nexus.

To ensure the veracity of our findings, we employed a variety of statistical tests, modeling techniques, and control variables, much like the strategic deployment of droids in a galactic skirmish. Through these methodological maneuvers, we sought to shield our analysis from lurking confounders and construct a sturdy empirical framework that could withstand the gravitational pull of alternative explanations.

In a nod to the whimsical nature of our research endeavor, we injected a dash of levity into our methodology. For instance, we quantified the intensity of lightsaber-related search fervor using a scale ranging from 'Padawan' to 'Master' level interest, eliciting a chuckle or two from our research cohort. Additionally, we leveraged the power of wordplay to infuse our quantitative analyses with a sprinkle of mirth, endeavoring to honor the lighthearted spirit of our investigation.

Like a Jedi in training, our research methodology ventured into uncharted territories, guided by a spirit of curiosity and a dose of scholarly rigor. This approach allowed us to shed light on the perplexing junction of lightsaber yearning and pest control pursuits, unveiling a correlation that, much like a good dad joke, prompts both amusement and contemplation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and The number of pest control workers in District of Columbia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2004 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.9590726, r-squared of 0.9198203, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shining a Light on Lightsaber Longings: Analyzing the Association Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Pest Control Employment in the District of Columbia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. With a touch of humor and a sprinkling of data analysis, we investigate this peculiar nexus and unearth some surprising findings.

In a quest to shed light on this curious connection, our research team utilized data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employing correlation analysis, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9590726 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2019. This statistical association surpasses the deftness of even the most skilled Jedi!

Our findings suggest that as Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" rise, there is a parallel increase in the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. The exact mechanism underlying this link remains shrouded in mystery, but it certainly adds an electrifying twist to the world of pest control and lightsaber lore.

These results may elicit a raised eyebrow or a knowing smile, much like the allure of a certain fatherly pun. This study offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking addition to the realm of academic inquiry, demonstrating that even the most unexpected connections can harbor enlightening insights.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the famous saying goes, "The force is strong with this one." In a galaxy not so far, far away, we embark on an illuminating quest to explore the unexpected ties between Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. This inquiry promises to unveil insights that are truly out of this world – and perhaps shed some light on pest control practices in the process.
The intersection of lightsaber construction curiosity and pest management prowess may at first glance appear as distant as the moons of Endor, but our analysis brings forth a startling connection that is sure to captivate both Jedi enthusiasts and entomology aficionados alike.
A long time ago, in a statistical analysis far, far away, our research team set out to investigate the fluctuating tides of lightsaber-related inquiries and their seemingly synchronized dance with the ebb and flow of pest control labor forces. As we delved into this unusual confluence, the data hinted at an unexpected correlation that might tempt even the most resistant astromech droid to emit a wry whistle of surprise.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis conducted on the Google search data for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia yielded intriguing results. We discovered a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9590726, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation coefficient is stronger than the magnetic pull of the Death Star – truly a force to be reckoned with.

The high r-squared value of 0.9198203 further reinforces the substantial extent to which variations in Google searches for lightsaber construction are associated with changes in the employment of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. It seems this relationship is as solid as durasteel, engaging the attention of both researchers and aficionados alike.

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that this correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance. It appears that the force guiding this relationship is indeed powerful, contributing to a statistical significance that would make even Yoda nod in agreement.

Fig. 1, a scatterplot displayed in the figure, vividly illustrates the tight clustering of data points, emphasizing the strong positive association between Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. The figures are as closely aligned as a pair of lightsaber blades in the hands of a skilled Jedi.

These findings invite a new perspective on the interplay between popular culture and labor market dynamics, prompting further exploration into the unexpected intergalactic and entomological crossover. One might say that this correlation is not just statistically significant, but also "punny" – much like the best dad jokes, it leaves one simultaneously amused and bemused.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and The number of pest control workers in District of Columbia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Shining a Light on Lightsaber Longings: Analyzing the Association Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Pest Control Employment in the District of Columbia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. With a touch of humor and a sprinkling of data analysis, we investigate this peculiar nexus and unearth some surprising findings.

In a quest to shed light on this curious connection, our research team utilized data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employing correlation analysis, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9590726 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2019. This statistical association surpasses the deftness of even the most skilled Jedi!

Our findings suggest that as Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" rise, there is a parallel increase in the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. The exact mechanism underlying this link remains shrouded in mystery, but it certainly adds an electrifying twist to the world of pest control and lightsaber lore.

These results may elicit a raised eyebrow or a knowing smile, much like the allure of a certain fatherly pun. This study offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking addition to the realm of academic inquiry, demonstrating that even the most unexpected connections can harbor enlightening insights.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a robust correlation between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. This initial revelation piques our interest and prompts further exploration into this quizzical enigma.
However, as we delve deeper into the research surrounding lightsaber construction and pest control, we encounter "Doe's in Pests and Fandom," which provides a whimsical yet compelling analysis of the cultural impact of lightsaber enthusiasms on the pest control industry. The authors aptly note that the energy surrounding lightsaber construction may inadvertently attract both aspiring Jedi and determined pest exterminators.
To shed further light on this unexpected relationship, "Jones's Entomology and Intergalactic Adventures" presents an intriguing hypothesis, suggesting that the allure of lightsaber craftsmanship parallels a surge in interest in pest control careers. The author humorously dubs this phenomenon the "Luke Skywalker Effect," igniting a playful yet thought-provoking discourse on the intersection of fictional weaponry and real-world pest management.
Moving beyond academic literature, "The Ultimate Guide to Lightsaber Construction" by A. J. Womp Rat and "Pest Control Strategies for Urban Environments" by Dr. E. W. Ang suggest a curious overlap in the enthusiasts of lightsaber fabrication and those devoted to tackling urban pests. The unexpected pairing of these subject matters elicits a chuckle and encourages a whimsical examination of their potential interplay.
Moreover, works of fiction such as "The Exterminator Strikes Back" by G. Lucas and "The Phantom Pest Control" by G. R. R. Marten provide a fantastical backdrop to our investigation, highlighting the pervasive presence of pest control themes in popular culture. These literary indulgences serve as a reminder that even the most surreal scenarios can influence real-world phenomena.
In the realm of social media, an anonymous post humorously mused that the surge in interest in lightsaber construction tutorials mirrors the rising demand for pest control services, postulating that perhaps lightsaber enthusiasts seek to channel their prowess towards vanquishing pests. Such informal observations add a touch of levity to our inquiry and prompt us to consider the more whimsical aspects of this peculiar connection.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis conducted on the Google search data for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia yielded intriguing results. We discovered a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9590726, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation coefficient is stronger than the magnetic pull of the Death Star – truly a force to be reckoned with.
The high r-squared value of 0.9198203 further reinforces the substantial extent to which variations in Google searches for lightsaber construction are associated with changes in the employment of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. It seems this relationship is as solid as durasteel, engaging the attention of both researchers and aficionados alike.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that this correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance. It appears that the force guiding this relationship is indeed powerful, contributing to a statistical significance that would make even Yoda nod in agreement.
Fig. 1, a scatterplot displayed in the figure, vividly illustrates the tight clustering of data points, emphasizing the strong positive association between Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. The figures are as closely aligned as a pair of lightsaber blades in the hands of a skilled Jedi.
These findings invite a new perspective on the interplay between popular culture and labor market dynamics, prompting further exploration into the unexpected intergalactic and entomological crossover. One might say that this correlation is not just statistically significant, but also "punny" – much like the best dad jokes, it leaves one simultaneously amused and bemused.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study provide resounding support for the previous research conducted by Smith et al., affirming a notably robust correlation between Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. The findings corroborate the initial revelation of this uncanny nexus, which stands as a testament to the pervasive influence of lightsaber longings on the labor dynamics of pest control. One might say that the statistical association shines as brightly as the blade of a lightsaber, illuminating the unexpected interconnection between popular culture and occupational pursuits.

Furthermore, our investigation echoes the whimsical yet compelling analysis presented by Doe, highlighting the cultural impact of lightsaber enthusiasms on the pest control industry. It seems that the energy surrounding lightsaber construction inadvertently attracts both aspiring Jedi and determined pest exterminators, engendering a synergy that defies conventional expectations. In a way, this phenomenon embodies the spirit of a good dad joke – surprising, unexpected, and undeniably entertaining.

In tandem with Jones's hypothesis of the "Luke Skywalker Effect," our findings lend credence to the notion that the allure of lightsaber craftsmanship parallels a surge in interest in pest control careers. The statistical robustness of this association evokes a sense of marvel akin to the revelation of an unexpected punchline – it defies prediction yet elicits a knowing smile.

Our study also resonates with the unexpected pairing of lightsaber fabrication enthusiasts and urban pest management devotees, echoing the curious overlap highlighted by A. J. Womp Rat and Dr. E. W. Ang. The unanticipated interplay of these subject matters evokes a chuckle and encourages a whimsical examination of their potential synergy, much like the clever twist in a well-executed joke.

Moreover, our findings align with the wry humor and fantastical backdrop presented in literary works such as "The Exterminator Strikes Back" and "The Phantom Pest Control," underscoring the notion that even the most surreal scenarios can influence real-world phenomena. This resonance evokes a sense of amusement akin to that elicited by a well-crafted dad joke – unexpected, yet oddly fitting.

In sum, our study's results validate and extend the playful yet compelling discourse surrounding the intersection of lightsaber lore and the realm of pest management. This unexpected fusion of popular culture and labor dynamics serves as a lighthearted yet thought-provoking addition to the academic inquiry, much like the well-placed punchline in a dad joke – it prompts a simultaneous raised eyebrow and a knowing smile, underscoring that even the most unexpected connections can harbor enlightening insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and The number of pest control workers in District of Columbia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Shining a Light on Lightsaber Longings: Analyzing the Association Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Pest Control Employment in the District of Columbia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. With a touch of humor and a sprinkling of data analysis, we investigate this peculiar nexus and unearth some surprising findings.

In a quest to shed light on this curious connection, our research team utilized data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employing correlation analysis, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9590726 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2019. This statistical association surpasses the deftness of even the most skilled Jedi!

Our findings suggest that as Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" rise, there is a parallel increase in the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. The exact mechanism underlying this link remains shrouded in mystery, but it certainly adds an electrifying twist to the world of pest control and lightsaber lore.

These results may elicit a raised eyebrow or a knowing smile, much like the allure of a certain fatherly pun. This study offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking addition to the realm of academic inquiry, demonstrating that even the most unexpected connections can harbor enlightening insights.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the famous saying goes, "The force is strong with this one." In a galaxy not so far, far away, we embark on an illuminating quest to explore the unexpected ties between Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. This inquiry promises to unveil insights that are truly out of this world – and perhaps shed some light on pest control practices in the process.
The intersection of lightsaber construction curiosity and pest management prowess may at first glance appear as distant as the moons of Endor, but our analysis brings forth a startling connection that is sure to captivate both Jedi enthusiasts and entomology aficionados alike.
A long time ago, in a statistical analysis far, far away, our research team set out to investigate the fluctuating tides of lightsaber-related inquiries and their seemingly synchronized dance with the ebb and flow of pest control labor forces. As we delved into this unusual confluence, the data hinted at an unexpected correlation that might tempt even the most resistant astromech droid to emit a wry whistle of surprise.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis conducted on the Google search data for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia yielded intriguing results. We discovered a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9590726, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation coefficient is stronger than the magnetic pull of the Death Star – truly a force to be reckoned with.
The high r-squared value of 0.9198203 further reinforces the substantial extent to which variations in Google searches for lightsaber construction are associated with changes in the employment of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. It seems this relationship is as solid as durasteel, engaging the attention of both researchers and aficionados alike.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that this correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance. It appears that the force guiding this relationship is indeed powerful, contributing to a statistical significance that would make even Yoda nod in agreement.
Fig. 1, a scatterplot displayed in the figure, vividly illustrates the tight clustering of data points, emphasizing the strong positive association between Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. The figures are as closely aligned as a pair of lightsaber blades in the hands of a skilled Jedi.
These findings invite a new perspective on the interplay between popular culture and labor market dynamics, prompting further exploration into the unexpected intergalactic and entomological crossover. One might say that this correlation is not just statistically significant, but also "punny" – much like the best dad jokes, it leaves one simultaneously amused and bemused.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the relationship between Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia has uncovered a surprising and robust association. This connection, as unlikely as it may seem, has proven to be as real as a Tauntaun on Hoth. The statistical analysis has revealed a correlation coefficient stronger than the gravitational pull of a black hole, highlighting the compelling link between the allure of lightsaber construction and the demand for pest control services.

The results of this study not only point to a striking correlation but also open the door to a myriad of potential explanations and interpretations. While the exact mechanism underlying this phenomenon remains as mysterious as the dark side of the Force, our findings offer a glimmer of understanding into the intricate interplay between popular culture interests and labor market dynamics. This unforeseen connection between lightsaber inquiries and pest control labor forces is a testament to the creativity and unpredictability of human behavior – much like the punchline of a well-crafted dad joke, it keeps us on our toes.

Our research has added a dash of levity to the realm of academic inquiry, demonstrating that even the most whimsical of connections can harbor thought-provoking insights. With this, we close the chapter on the correlation between lightsaber construction curiosity and pest control employment in the District of Columbia, confident in the knowledge that this unlikely union has been brought to light. As for future inquiries into this area, one might say, "May the force be with those who seek further exploration," but in all seriousness, no more research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Shining a Light on Lightsaber Longings: Analyzing the Association Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Pest Control Employment in the District of Columbia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Unconventional Interdisciplinary Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Shining a Light on Lightsaber Longings: Analyzing the Association Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Pest Control Employment in the District of Columbia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Extraterrestrial Studies and Urban Ecology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Shining a Light on Lightsaber Longings: Analyzing the Association Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Pest Control Employment in the District of Columbia with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the frequency of Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" and the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. With a touch of humor and a sprinkling of data analysis, we investigate this peculiar nexus and unearth some surprising findings.
In a quest to shed light on this curious connection, our research team utilized data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employing correlation analysis, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9590726 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2019. This statistical association surpasses the deftness of even the most skilled Jedi!
Our findings suggest that as Google searches for "how to build a lightsaber" rise, there is a parallel increase in the number of pest control workers in the District of Columbia. The exact mechanism underlying this link remains shrouded in mystery, but it certainly adds an electrifying twist to the world of pest control and lightsaber lore.
These results may elicit a raised eyebrow or a knowing smile, much like the allure of a certain fatherly pun. This study offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking addition to the realm of academic inquiry, demonstrating that even the most unexpected connections can harbor enlightening insights.

ChatGPT:

Google searches, "how to build a lightsaber", pest control employment, District of Columbia, correlation analysis, Google Trends, Bureau of Labor Statistics, statistical association, lightsaber lore, unexpected connections, academic inquiry

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber'

The number of pest control workers in District of Columbia
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of pest control workers in District of Columbia
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of pest control workers in District of Columbia

Correlation r = 0.9590726 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9198203 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of pest control workers in District of Columbia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber') over the 16 years from 2004 through 2019.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.6E-9. 0.0000000046279487974785560000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 4.6E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 216,078,449 random variables You don't actually need 216 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.88, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019
Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' (Rel. search volume)5.9166722.91674.754.083334.333333.833334.252.51.833331.916671.8333332.416671.31.111112.36364
The number of pest control workers in District of Columbia (Pest Control Workers)402206050404040404030304030306040




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5.91667,22.9167,4.75,4.08333,4.33333,3.83333,4.25,2.5,1.83333,1.91667,1.83333,3,2.41667,1.3,1.11111,2.36364,])
array_2 = np.array([40,220,60,50,40,40,40,40,40,30,30,40,30,30,60,40,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber'"
array_2_name = "The number of pest control workers in District of Columbia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 5962 · Black Variable ID: 1521 · Red Variable ID: 6346
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0