about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,952 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'im not even mad' and the second variable is Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme.  The chart goes from 2015 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As people's ability to stay chill and not get worked up decreased, they were no longer in the right mindset to whip and/or nae nae with the same level of enthusiasm. The lack of 'not even mad' energy was a major hit to the whip nae nae community, leading to a decline in its overall coolness. Less zen led to less swag, and the meme just couldn't keep its groove without that tranquil vibe.

Create a meme inspired by the whip nae nae meme that in some way references Google searches for 'im not even mad'. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in im not even mad (Google searches for 'im not even mad') caused Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
I'm Not Even Mad, Said Rad, So Whip, Nae-Nae: A Correlational Study of Google Searches and Internet Memes

The Journal of Digital Memetics and Internet Culture

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'im not even mad' and Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9676349 and p < 0.01 for 2015 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"I'm Not Even Mad", Said Rad, So Whip, Nae-Nae: A Correlational Study of Google Searches and Internet Memes

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the relationship between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the popularity of the "whip nae nae" meme. Leveraging data from Google Trends, our study uncovers a correlation coefficient of 0.9676349, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, from 2015 to 2023. While some may scoff at the association between these seemingly disparate phenomena, our findings suggest a curious synchronicity in online search behavior and meme virality. We delve into the implications of these results and propose that the interplay between internet culture and user sentiment warrants further investigation. Thus, we encourage future research to scrutinize the whimsical world of internet infatuations and their unexpected connections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'im not even mad' and Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"I'm Not Even Mad", Said Rad, So Whip, Nae-Nae: A Correlational Study of Google Searches and Internet Memes

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the relationship between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the popularity of the "whip nae nae" meme. Leveraging data from Google Trends, our study uncovers a correlation coefficient of 0.9676349, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, from 2015 to 2023. While some may scoff at the association between these seemingly disparate phenomena, our findings suggest a curious synchronicity in online search behavior and meme virality. We delve into the implications of these results and propose that the interplay between internet culture and user sentiment warrants further investigation. Thus, we encourage future research to scrutinize the whimsical world of internet infatuations and their unexpected connections.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the grand expanse of the internet, a peculiar dance unfolds - not one of pirouettes or jigs, but of algorithmic patterns and meme madness. The digital landscape is a realm where the profound and the preposterous coexist, where "I'm not even mad" meets "whip nae nae" in a curious embrace of online idiosyncrasies. While seemingly divergent, the correlation between these phenomena beckons us to unravel the enigmatic tapestry of internet culture.

The lament "I'm not even mad" resounds across the virtual realm, echoing from the depths of comment sections and social media threads. Its nuanced expression of nonchalance, tinged with a hint of bemusement, captivates the internet denizens, prompting them to ponder the ineffable ambivalence encapsulated in those five words. Meanwhile, the "whip nae nae" meme bursts onto the scene like a tempest, propelling itself into the collective consciousness with its infectious dance moves and irresistible charm.

As these digital echoes reverberate through cyberspace, we are compelled to investigate their entwined fates. Do the fluctuations in Google searches for "I'm not even mad" hold some mysterious influence over the tidal waves of "whip nae nae" phenomenon? Or are we merely chasing shadows in the ever-changing landscape of internet whimsy?

The objective of this research is to delve into this dynamic interplay, unearthing the underlying patterns that bind these seemingly disparate expressions of online culture. Through the lens of data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we aim to illuminate the enigmatic relationship between user sentiment and meme propagation in the digital domain.

With a touch of statistical rigor and a dash of whimsical curiosity, we embark on a journey to unravel the cryptic connections that underpin the peculiar symphony of "I'm not even mad" and "whip nae nae." Join us as we waltz through the corridors of internet oddities, seeking to unmask the peculiar dance of correlation that resides within the realm of internet memes and search trends.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'im not even mad' and Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"I'm Not Even Mad", Said Rad, So Whip, Nae-Nae: A Correlational Study of Google Searches and Internet Memes

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the relationship between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the popularity of the "whip nae nae" meme. Leveraging data from Google Trends, our study uncovers a correlation coefficient of 0.9676349, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, from 2015 to 2023. While some may scoff at the association between these seemingly disparate phenomena, our findings suggest a curious synchronicity in online search behavior and meme virality. We delve into the implications of these results and propose that the interplay between internet culture and user sentiment warrants further investigation. Thus, we encourage future research to scrutinize the whimsical world of internet infatuations and their unexpected connections.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the grand expanse of the internet, a peculiar dance unfolds - not one of pirouettes or jigs, but of algorithmic patterns and meme madness. The digital landscape is a realm where the profound and the preposterous coexist, where "I'm not even mad" meets "whip nae nae" in a curious embrace of online idiosyncrasies. While seemingly divergent, the correlation between these phenomena beckons us to unravel the enigmatic tapestry of internet culture.
The lament "I'm not even mad" resounds across the virtual realm, echoing from the depths of comment sections and social media threads. Its nuanced expression of nonchalance, tinged with a hint of bemusement, captivates the internet denizens, prompting them to ponder the ineffable ambivalence encapsulated in those five words. Meanwhile, the "whip nae nae" meme bursts onto the scene like a tempest, propelling itself into the collective consciousness with its infectious dance moves and irresistible charm.
As these digital echoes reverberate through cyberspace, we are compelled to investigate their entwined fates. Do the fluctuations in Google searches for "I'm not even mad" hold some mysterious influence over the tidal waves of "whip nae nae" phenomenon? Or are we merely chasing shadows in the ever-changing landscape of internet whimsy?
The objective of this research is to delve into this dynamic interplay, unearthing the underlying patterns that bind these seemingly disparate expressions of online culture. Through the lens of data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we aim to illuminate the enigmatic relationship between user sentiment and meme propagation in the digital domain.
With a touch of statistical rigor and a dash of whimsical curiosity, we embark on a journey to unravel the cryptic connections that underpin the peculiar symphony of "I'm not even mad" and "whip nae nae." Join us as we waltz through the corridors of internet oddities, seeking to unmask the peculiar dance of correlation that resides within the realm of internet memes and search trends.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al. (2018)," the authors find a significant positive correlation between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the virality of the "whip nae nae" meme. These findings suggest a potential interplay between internet user sentiment and the propagation of internet memes, raising intriguing questions about the whimsical nature of online culture. Furthermore, Doe and Jones (2021) identify a similar association in their study, indicating a notable link between user behavior and meme trends in the digital domain.

The literature on internet memes and user sentiment provides valuable insights into the peculiar dynamics of online interactions. As the virtual landscape teems with quirky expressions and viral phenomena, researchers have sought to unravel the idiosyncrasies of internet culture. This pursuit has led to a cascade of studies, each striving to capture the essence of digital oddities and their enigmatic allure.

Turning to non-fiction sources, "Memes and Internet Culture" by Ryan M. Milner offers a comprehensive exploration of the evolution of internet memes and their impact on contemporary digital communication. While "The Selfish Gene" by Richard Dawkins delves into the concept of memes as replicators of cultural information, shedding light on the memes' role in shaping human behavior and societal trends.

In the realm of fiction, "Ready Player One" by Ernest Cline presents a futuristic narrative intertwined with virtual reality and internet subcultures, providing a speculative glimpse into the potential evolution of internet phenomena. Similarly, "Snow Crash" by Neal Stephenson weaves a tale of virtual reality, memetic viruses, and cyberpunk adventures, offering a riveting portrayal of internet culture in a dystopian world.

Reflecting on childhood influences, the animated series "SpongeBob SquarePants" features a plethora of meme-worthy moments and catchphrases, contributing to the cultural lexicon of internet memes. Additionally, the zany antics of "Looney Tunes" characters, such as Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck, have permeated internet culture, inspiring a myriad of memes and online tributes.

In a whimsical twist of digital fate, the synthesis of serious scholarship and playful musings invites us to embrace the whimsical world of internet infatuations and their unexpected connections. As we wade through the turbulent sea of online oddities, we are reminded of the delightful dance of correlation that pervades the enigmatic realm of internet memes and search trends.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'im not even mad' and Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Google Trends . You used data from 2015 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"I'm Not Even Mad", Said Rad, So Whip, Nae-Nae: A Correlational Study of Google Searches and Internet Memes

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the relationship between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the popularity of the "whip nae nae" meme. Leveraging data from Google Trends, our study uncovers a correlation coefficient of 0.9676349, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, from 2015 to 2023. While some may scoff at the association between these seemingly disparate phenomena, our findings suggest a curious synchronicity in online search behavior and meme virality. We delve into the implications of these results and propose that the interplay between internet culture and user sentiment warrants further investigation. Thus, we encourage future research to scrutinize the whimsical world of internet infatuations and their unexpected connections.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the grand expanse of the internet, a peculiar dance unfolds - not one of pirouettes or jigs, but of algorithmic patterns and meme madness. The digital landscape is a realm where the profound and the preposterous coexist, where "I'm not even mad" meets "whip nae nae" in a curious embrace of online idiosyncrasies. While seemingly divergent, the correlation between these phenomena beckons us to unravel the enigmatic tapestry of internet culture.
The lament "I'm not even mad" resounds across the virtual realm, echoing from the depths of comment sections and social media threads. Its nuanced expression of nonchalance, tinged with a hint of bemusement, captivates the internet denizens, prompting them to ponder the ineffable ambivalence encapsulated in those five words. Meanwhile, the "whip nae nae" meme bursts onto the scene like a tempest, propelling itself into the collective consciousness with its infectious dance moves and irresistible charm.
As these digital echoes reverberate through cyberspace, we are compelled to investigate their entwined fates. Do the fluctuations in Google searches for "I'm not even mad" hold some mysterious influence over the tidal waves of "whip nae nae" phenomenon? Or are we merely chasing shadows in the ever-changing landscape of internet whimsy?
The objective of this research is to delve into this dynamic interplay, unearthing the underlying patterns that bind these seemingly disparate expressions of online culture. Through the lens of data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we aim to illuminate the enigmatic relationship between user sentiment and meme propagation in the digital domain.
With a touch of statistical rigor and a dash of whimsical curiosity, we embark on a journey to unravel the cryptic connections that underpin the peculiar symphony of "I'm not even mad" and "whip nae nae." Join us as we waltz through the corridors of internet oddities, seeking to unmask the peculiar dance of correlation that resides within the realm of internet memes and search trends.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study entailed the systematic collection and analysis of data from Google Trends, from the years 2015 to 2023. The primary data source for this investigation was the time series report from Google Trends, which captures the search interest of the term "I'm not even mad" and the popularity of the "whip nae nae" meme over the specified period.

To initiate the research process, an exhaustive search was conducted to identify the most reliable and relevant data sources. While this process involved navigating through the labyrinthine expanses of the internet, we managed to secure the veritable treasure trove of information from Google Trends. Though the gathering of this data involved sifting through a mire of internet detritus, our intrepid research team emerged victorious, armed with the robust dataset required for our analysis.

The period of 2015 to 2023 was selected to encapsulate the evolutionary trajectory of online search behavior and meme dissemination. This time frame allowed us to capture the undulating tides of internet trends and semblance from the era when the "whip nae nae" made its unforgettable debut to its influence on the digital realm in subsequent years.

Utilizing a series of sophisticated statistical analyses, we quantified the search interest for "I'm not even mad" and the propagation of the "whip nae nae" meme. The temporal patterns in online search behavior and meme popularity were subjected to rigorous scrutiny, employing correlation analysis and time series modeling techniques.

The correlation coefficient, calculated with painstaking precision, illuminated the striking association between the Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the virality of the "whip nae nae" meme. The statistical significance of this correlation was verified using a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly incongruous phenomena.

Furthermore, to enhance the robustness of our findings, we implemented cross-validation procedures to validate the accuracy and reliability of our analysis. This entailed dissecting the data with an analytical scalpel to ensure that our results were not mere figments of statistical happenstance but rather compelling evidence of the entwined destinies of internet search behavior and viral memes.

In conclusion, the methodology employed in this study facilitated the comprehensive examination of the relationship between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the prevalence of the "whip nae nae" meme. Through a meticulous amalgamation of data collection, statistical analysis, and a touch of gallows humor, we elucidated the enigmatic synchronicity between these peculiar internet phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'im not even mad' and Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Google Trends .

For the time period 2015 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9676349, r-squared of 0.9363174, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"I'm Not Even Mad", Said Rad, So Whip, Nae-Nae: A Correlational Study of Google Searches and Internet Memes

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the relationship between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the popularity of the "whip nae nae" meme. Leveraging data from Google Trends, our study uncovers a correlation coefficient of 0.9676349, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, from 2015 to 2023. While some may scoff at the association between these seemingly disparate phenomena, our findings suggest a curious synchronicity in online search behavior and meme virality. We delve into the implications of these results and propose that the interplay between internet culture and user sentiment warrants further investigation. Thus, we encourage future research to scrutinize the whimsical world of internet infatuations and their unexpected connections.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the grand expanse of the internet, a peculiar dance unfolds - not one of pirouettes or jigs, but of algorithmic patterns and meme madness. The digital landscape is a realm where the profound and the preposterous coexist, where "I'm not even mad" meets "whip nae nae" in a curious embrace of online idiosyncrasies. While seemingly divergent, the correlation between these phenomena beckons us to unravel the enigmatic tapestry of internet culture.
The lament "I'm not even mad" resounds across the virtual realm, echoing from the depths of comment sections and social media threads. Its nuanced expression of nonchalance, tinged with a hint of bemusement, captivates the internet denizens, prompting them to ponder the ineffable ambivalence encapsulated in those five words. Meanwhile, the "whip nae nae" meme bursts onto the scene like a tempest, propelling itself into the collective consciousness with its infectious dance moves and irresistible charm.
As these digital echoes reverberate through cyberspace, we are compelled to investigate their entwined fates. Do the fluctuations in Google searches for "I'm not even mad" hold some mysterious influence over the tidal waves of "whip nae nae" phenomenon? Or are we merely chasing shadows in the ever-changing landscape of internet whimsy?
The objective of this research is to delve into this dynamic interplay, unearthing the underlying patterns that bind these seemingly disparate expressions of online culture. Through the lens of data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we aim to illuminate the enigmatic relationship between user sentiment and meme propagation in the digital domain.
With a touch of statistical rigor and a dash of whimsical curiosity, we embark on a journey to unravel the cryptic connections that underpin the peculiar symphony of "I'm not even mad" and "whip nae nae." Join us as we waltz through the corridors of internet oddities, seeking to unmask the peculiar dance of correlation that resides within the realm of internet memes and search trends.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In parsing through the labyrinthine depths of internet data, we uncovered a remarkably robust correlation between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the proliferation of the "whip nae nae" meme. The correlation coefficient of 0.9676349 suggests an exceptionally strong positive relationship between these seemingly incongruent phenomena from 2015 to 2023. Moreover, the high r-squared value of 0.9363174 indicates that a substantial proportion of the variance in the popularity of the "whip nae nae" meme can be explained by the fluctuations in Google searches for "I'm not even mad."

Our quest for insight into this unholy matrimony of internet oddities has yielded a notable result, and the statistical significance at p < 0.01 further bolsters the validity of our findings. It appears that the cyberspace, ever enigmatic and capricious, has orchestrated the clandestine union of these two peculiar entities.

As attested by Figure 1, a scatterplot visualizes the prodigious correlation we unearthed, portraying the covariation between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the rise and fall of the "whip nae nae" meme with a compelling resonance. The scatterplot elegantly encapsulates the synchronized undulations of these digital phenomena, underlining the unanticipated harmony that permeates the internet's whimsical ecosystem.

Despite the seemingly whimsical nature of our subject matter, the robust statistical evidence compels us to contemplate the profound implications of these findings. The digital domain, as it turns out, is not immune to underlying currents of obscure connectivity, where the caprices of internet culture and the idiosyncrasies of user sentiment intertwine with surprising serendipity.

In conclusion, while the association between trends in Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the dissemination of the "whip nae nae" meme may seem ludicrous at first glance, our research suggests a deeper interdependence that warrants further scrutiny. We lay bare this unexpected liaison between internet search behavior and meme virality, paving the way for future investigations to explore the tangled web of digital eccentricities and their labyrinthine connections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'im not even mad' and Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"I'm Not Even Mad", Said Rad, So Whip, Nae-Nae: A Correlational Study of Google Searches and Internet Memes

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the relationship between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the popularity of the "whip nae nae" meme. Leveraging data from Google Trends, our study uncovers a correlation coefficient of 0.9676349, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, from 2015 to 2023. While some may scoff at the association between these seemingly disparate phenomena, our findings suggest a curious synchronicity in online search behavior and meme virality. We delve into the implications of these results and propose that the interplay between internet culture and user sentiment warrants further investigation. Thus, we encourage future research to scrutinize the whimsical world of internet infatuations and their unexpected connections.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al. (2018)," the authors find a significant positive correlation between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the virality of the "whip nae nae" meme. These findings suggest a potential interplay between internet user sentiment and the propagation of internet memes, raising intriguing questions about the whimsical nature of online culture. Furthermore, Doe and Jones (2021) identify a similar association in their study, indicating a notable link between user behavior and meme trends in the digital domain.
The literature on internet memes and user sentiment provides valuable insights into the peculiar dynamics of online interactions. As the virtual landscape teems with quirky expressions and viral phenomena, researchers have sought to unravel the idiosyncrasies of internet culture. This pursuit has led to a cascade of studies, each striving to capture the essence of digital oddities and their enigmatic allure.
Turning to non-fiction sources, "Memes and Internet Culture" by Ryan M. Milner offers a comprehensive exploration of the evolution of internet memes and their impact on contemporary digital communication. While "The Selfish Gene" by Richard Dawkins delves into the concept of memes as replicators of cultural information, shedding light on the memes' role in shaping human behavior and societal trends.
In the realm of fiction, "Ready Player One" by Ernest Cline presents a futuristic narrative intertwined with virtual reality and internet subcultures, providing a speculative glimpse into the potential evolution of internet phenomena. Similarly, "Snow Crash" by Neal Stephenson weaves a tale of virtual reality, memetic viruses, and cyberpunk adventures, offering a riveting portrayal of internet culture in a dystopian world.
Reflecting on childhood influences, the animated series "SpongeBob SquarePants" features a plethora of meme-worthy moments and catchphrases, contributing to the cultural lexicon of internet memes. Additionally, the zany antics of "Looney Tunes" characters, such as Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck, have permeated internet culture, inspiring a myriad of memes and online tributes.
In a whimsical twist of digital fate, the synthesis of serious scholarship and playful musings invites us to embrace the whimsical world of internet infatuations and their unexpected connections. As we wade through the turbulent sea of online oddities, we are reminded of the delightful dance of correlation that pervades the enigmatic realm of internet memes and search trends.

[[RESULTS]]
In parsing through the labyrinthine depths of internet data, we uncovered a remarkably robust correlation between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the proliferation of the "whip nae nae" meme. The correlation coefficient of 0.9676349 suggests an exceptionally strong positive relationship between these seemingly incongruent phenomena from 2015 to 2023. Moreover, the high r-squared value of 0.9363174 indicates that a substantial proportion of the variance in the popularity of the "whip nae nae" meme can be explained by the fluctuations in Google searches for "I'm not even mad."
Our quest for insight into this unholy matrimony of internet oddities has yielded a notable result, and the statistical significance at p < 0.01 further bolsters the validity of our findings. It appears that the cyberspace, ever enigmatic and capricious, has orchestrated the clandestine union of these two peculiar entities.
As attested by Figure 1, a scatterplot visualizes the prodigious correlation we unearthed, portraying the covariation between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the rise and fall of the "whip nae nae" meme with a compelling resonance. The scatterplot elegantly encapsulates the synchronized undulations of these digital phenomena, underlining the unanticipated harmony that permeates the internet's whimsical ecosystem.
Despite the seemingly whimsical nature of our subject matter, the robust statistical evidence compels us to contemplate the profound implications of these findings. The digital domain, as it turns out, is not immune to underlying currents of obscure connectivity, where the caprices of internet culture and the idiosyncrasies of user sentiment intertwine with surprising serendipity.
In conclusion, while the association between trends in Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the dissemination of the "whip nae nae" meme may seem ludicrous at first glance, our research suggests a deeper interdependence that warrants further scrutiny. We lay bare this unexpected liaison between internet search behavior and meme virality, paving the way for future investigations to explore the tangled web of digital eccentricities and their labyrinthine connections.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings not only validate prior research by Smith et al. and Doe and Jones, but also serve to illuminate the whimsical nexus of internet culture and user sentiment. The veritable marriage between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the meteoric ascent of the "whip nae nae" meme establishes a compelling case for the interplay of digital oddities and their enigmatic allure.

Upon revisiting the literature review, the perplexing linkage between memes and user sentiment takes on a newfound gravity. The correlation coefficient of 0.9676349 uncovered in our study resonates with the lighthearted musings of Milner on the evolution of internet memes and their impact on contemporary digital communication. Indeed, the statistical robustness of our results mirrors the replicative nature of Dawkins' concept of memes as cultural information carriers, emphasizing the substantial influence of internet phenomena on user behavior and societal trends.

Turning to the unexpected juxtaposition of fiction sources, the speculative narratives in "Ready Player One" and "Snow Crash" acquire a new resonance in light of our findings. The uncanny fusion of virtual reality, memetic viruses, and cyberpunk adventures illustrates the uncanny dance of correlation that pervades the realm of internet memes and search trends—a dance we have dutifully chronicled in our research.

In the wake of our statistical revelations, the scatterplot presented in Figure 1 assumes a delightful significance. It not only captures the synchronized undulations of "I'm not even mad" searches and the "whip nae nae" meme's popularity but also encapsulates the capricious harmony that pervades the internet's whimsical ecosystem. This visualization offers a poignant reminder of the clandestine union we have unveiled, urging our scholarly peers to embrace the fairy tale romance of internet oddities and their serendipitous connections.

Whereas the mirthful allure of our research subject may elicit chuckles, the profound implications of our findings serve as a sobering reminder of the unanticipated prominence of internet culture in shaping our digital landscape. As such, our study endeavors to peel back the layers of internet whimsy, inviting a deeper contemplation of the enigmatic interdependence between search behavior and meme virality. With this in mind, we carve a path for future investigations to tango amid the tangled web of digital eccentricities, teasing out the labyrinthine connections that continue to bewilder and beguile us in the virtual realm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'im not even mad' and Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"I'm Not Even Mad", Said Rad, So Whip, Nae-Nae: A Correlational Study of Google Searches and Internet Memes

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the relationship between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the popularity of the "whip nae nae" meme. Leveraging data from Google Trends, our study uncovers a correlation coefficient of 0.9676349, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, from 2015 to 2023. While some may scoff at the association between these seemingly disparate phenomena, our findings suggest a curious synchronicity in online search behavior and meme virality. We delve into the implications of these results and propose that the interplay between internet culture and user sentiment warrants further investigation. Thus, we encourage future research to scrutinize the whimsical world of internet infatuations and their unexpected connections.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the grand expanse of the internet, a peculiar dance unfolds - not one of pirouettes or jigs, but of algorithmic patterns and meme madness. The digital landscape is a realm where the profound and the preposterous coexist, where "I'm not even mad" meets "whip nae nae" in a curious embrace of online idiosyncrasies. While seemingly divergent, the correlation between these phenomena beckons us to unravel the enigmatic tapestry of internet culture.
The lament "I'm not even mad" resounds across the virtual realm, echoing from the depths of comment sections and social media threads. Its nuanced expression of nonchalance, tinged with a hint of bemusement, captivates the internet denizens, prompting them to ponder the ineffable ambivalence encapsulated in those five words. Meanwhile, the "whip nae nae" meme bursts onto the scene like a tempest, propelling itself into the collective consciousness with its infectious dance moves and irresistible charm.
As these digital echoes reverberate through cyberspace, we are compelled to investigate their entwined fates. Do the fluctuations in Google searches for "I'm not even mad" hold some mysterious influence over the tidal waves of "whip nae nae" phenomenon? Or are we merely chasing shadows in the ever-changing landscape of internet whimsy?
The objective of this research is to delve into this dynamic interplay, unearthing the underlying patterns that bind these seemingly disparate expressions of online culture. Through the lens of data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we aim to illuminate the enigmatic relationship between user sentiment and meme propagation in the digital domain.
With a touch of statistical rigor and a dash of whimsical curiosity, we embark on a journey to unravel the cryptic connections that underpin the peculiar symphony of "I'm not even mad" and "whip nae nae." Join us as we waltz through the corridors of internet oddities, seeking to unmask the peculiar dance of correlation that resides within the realm of internet memes and search trends.

[[RESULTS]]
In parsing through the labyrinthine depths of internet data, we uncovered a remarkably robust correlation between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the proliferation of the "whip nae nae" meme. The correlation coefficient of 0.9676349 suggests an exceptionally strong positive relationship between these seemingly incongruent phenomena from 2015 to 2023. Moreover, the high r-squared value of 0.9363174 indicates that a substantial proportion of the variance in the popularity of the "whip nae nae" meme can be explained by the fluctuations in Google searches for "I'm not even mad."
Our quest for insight into this unholy matrimony of internet oddities has yielded a notable result, and the statistical significance at p < 0.01 further bolsters the validity of our findings. It appears that the cyberspace, ever enigmatic and capricious, has orchestrated the clandestine union of these two peculiar entities.
As attested by Figure 1, a scatterplot visualizes the prodigious correlation we unearthed, portraying the covariation between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the rise and fall of the "whip nae nae" meme with a compelling resonance. The scatterplot elegantly encapsulates the synchronized undulations of these digital phenomena, underlining the unanticipated harmony that permeates the internet's whimsical ecosystem.
Despite the seemingly whimsical nature of our subject matter, the robust statistical evidence compels us to contemplate the profound implications of these findings. The digital domain, as it turns out, is not immune to underlying currents of obscure connectivity, where the caprices of internet culture and the idiosyncrasies of user sentiment intertwine with surprising serendipity.
In conclusion, while the association between trends in Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the dissemination of the "whip nae nae" meme may seem ludicrous at first glance, our research suggests a deeper interdependence that warrants further scrutiny. We lay bare this unexpected liaison between internet search behavior and meme virality, paving the way for future investigations to explore the tangled web of digital eccentricities and their labyrinthine connections.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In the labyrinthine corridors of internet peculiarities, our investigation has shed light on the unlikely dalliance between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the meteoric rise of the "whip nae nae" meme. While some may view this correlation as frivolous, our rigorous analysis has revealed a robust and statistically significant relationship, with a correlation coefficient that would make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile. The scatterplot, akin to a digital Rorschach test, paints a vivid picture of the synchronized undulations of these two internet oddities, suggesting a clandestine kinship that transcends mere whimsy.

Beyond the whimsical dance of data, our study unveils a profound undercurrent in the digital domain, where the flippant nonchalance of "I'm not even mad" intertwines with the exuberant exhortation of "whip nae nae." This revelation challenges our preconceptions about the caprices of internet culture and the idiosyncrasies of user sentiment, prompting us to ponder the innate human propensity for connection, even in the most unexpected of places.

As we call time on this curious exploration, we must acknowledge the limitations of our endeavor. Our study merely scratches the surface of the enigmatic tapestry of internet absurdities, and there are realms of internet eccentricities left uncharted - from the enigmatic allure of cat videos to the quixotic allure of Rickrolling. While the allure of further exploration is undeniable, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. For now, let the "whip nae nae" continue its infectious dance without the weight of statistical scrutiny, and let "I'm not even mad" dwell in nonchalant peace, free from the prying eyes of research inquisitors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited I'm Not Even Mad, Said Rad, So Whip, Nae-Nae: A Correlational Study of Google Searches and Internet Memes. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Digital Memetics and Internet Culture


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited I'm Not Even Mad, Said Rad, So Whip, Nae-Nae: A Correlational Study of Google Searches and Internet Memes. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Internet Culture Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled I'm Not Even Mad, Said Rad, So Whip, Nae-Nae: A Correlational Study of Google Searches and Internet Memes with an abstract of This research investigates the relationship between Google searches for "I'm not even mad" and the popularity of the "whip nae nae" meme. Leveraging data from Google Trends, our study uncovers a correlation coefficient of 0.9676349, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, from 2015 to 2023. While some may scoff at the association between these seemingly disparate phenomena, our findings suggest a curious synchronicity in online search behavior and meme virality. We delve into the implications of these results and propose that the interplay between internet culture and user sentiment warrants further investigation. Thus, we encourage future research to scrutinize the whimsical world of internet infatuations and their unexpected connections.

ChatGPT:

Google searches, internet memes, "I'm not even mad", "whip nae nae", Google Trends, correlational study, online search behavior, meme virality, user sentiment, internet culture, internet infatuations, unexpected connections

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'im not even mad'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'im not even mad' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'im not even mad'

Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'whip nae nae' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme

Correlation r = 0.9676349 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9363174 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'im not even mad') over the 9 years from 2015 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.9E-5. 0.0000194562510849545130000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.0019% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 51,397 random variables You don't actually need 51 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.85, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201520162017201820192020202120222023
Google searches for 'im not even mad' (Rel. search volume)30.521.083314.91671615.2512.833310.833313.2512.9
Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme (Relative popularity)47.583316.08334.916672.583331.51.083331.2511




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([30.5,21.0833,14.9167,16,15.25,12.8333,10.8333,13.25,12.9,])
array_2 = np.array([47.5833,16.0833,4.91667,2.58333,1.5,1.08333,1.25,1,1,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'im not even mad'"
array_2_name = "Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 5952 · Black Variable ID: 1383 · Red Variable ID: 25122
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0