about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,864 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in and the second variable is Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs.  The chart goes from 1996 to 2011, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of Amy Poehler movies increased, so did the levels of laughter and positivity in the world. This led to a corresponding rise in the overall happiness of people, including mountaineers. The sheer joy and motivation they received from Amy's performances served as the ultimate catalyst for their successful ascents of Mount Everest. In a way, Amy Poehler's on-screen brilliance became the real-life inspiration that helped climbers reach new heights, quite literally.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, depicting a panoramic view of Mount Everest, with colorful prayer flags fluttering in the wind. The camera zooms out to reveal a vibrant and lively movie theater adjacent to the base camp, with a crowd eagerly waiting to enter. The marquee outside the theater displays the number of Amy Poehler movies and the total number of successful Everest climbs, both increasing simultaneously. Laughter and positivity radiate from the theater, filling the air with joy. In the distance, climbers can be seen scaling the peak, their faces beaming with happiness and determination, propelled by the infectious energy of Amy's performances. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Sci-fi fantacy Futuristic Pop art An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs, in the following situation: As the number of Amy Poehler movies increased, so did the levels of laughter and positivity in the world. This led to a corresponding rise in the overall happiness of people, including mountaineers. The sheer joy and motivation they received from Amy's performances served as the ultimate catalyst for their successful ascents of Mount Everest. In a way, Amy Poehler's on-screen brilliance became the real-life inspiration that helped climbers reach new heights, quite literally.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine a panoramic view of Mount Everest, with colorful prayer flags fluttering in the wind. As the camera zooms out, we see a bright and vibrant movie theater next to the base camp. A crowd is gathered outside, eagerly waiting to enter. The marquee displays the number of Amy Poehler movies and the total number of successful Everest climbs, both increasing simultaneously. Laughter and positivity radiate from the theater, filling the air with joy. In the distance, climbers can be seen scaling the peak, their faces beaming with happiness and determination, propelled by the infectious energy of Amy's performances.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a panoramic view of Mount Everest, with colorful prayer flags fluttering in the wind. As the camera zooms out, we see a bright and vibrant movie theater next to the base camp. A crowd is gathered outside, eagerly waiting to enter. The marquee displays the number of Amy Poehler movies and the total number of successful Everest climbs, both increasing simultaneously. Laughter and positivity radiate from the theater, filling the air with joy. In the distance, climbers can be seen scaling the peak, their faces beaming with happiness and determination, propelled by the infectious energy of Amy's performances. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, depicting a panoramic view of Mount Everest, with colorful prayer flags fluttering in the wind. The camera zooms out to reveal a vibrant and lively movie theater adjacent to the base camp, with a crowd eagerly waiting to enter. The marquee outside the theater displays the number of Amy Poehler movies and the total number of successful Everest climbs, both increasing simultaneously. Laughter and positivity radiate from the theater, filling the air with joy. In the distance, climbers can be seen scaling the peak, their faces beaming with happiness and determination, propelled by the infectious energy of Amy's performances.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in caused Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Laughing Matters: The Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents

The Journal of Humor and High Altitudes

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from The Movie DB and CBC to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8270590 and p < 0.01 for 1996 to 2011.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing Matters: The Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we take a humorous peek at the impact of actress Amy Poehler's filmography on the successful conquest of Mount Everest. By leveraging data from The Movie DB and CBC, we unearth a surprising correlation that tickles the funny bone. Our findings reveal a statistically significant relationship between the number of movies in which Amy Poehler appeared and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8270590 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1996 to 2011. Through our unconventional approach, we shed light on the whimsical interplay between popular culture and extreme athletic achievements, proving that comedy may indeed be the best altitude adjustment. So, next time you're summiting a mountain, don't forget to pack your favorite comedy flick - it might just give you the "Parks and Recreation" you need to reach the top!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing Matters: The Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we take a humorous peek at the impact of actress Amy Poehler's filmography on the successful conquest of Mount Everest. By leveraging data from The Movie DB and CBC, we unearth a surprising correlation that tickles the funny bone. Our findings reveal a statistically significant relationship between the number of movies in which Amy Poehler appeared and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8270590 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1996 to 2011. Through our unconventional approach, we shed light on the whimsical interplay between popular culture and extreme athletic achievements, proving that comedy may indeed be the best altitude adjustment. So, next time you're summiting a mountain, don't forget to pack your favorite comedy flick - it might just give you the "Parks and Recreation" you need to reach the top!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

Laughter is the best medicine, they say, but could it also be the best climber's aid? In this comically unconventional research paper, we set out to explore an unexpected relationship between the silver screen and towering snow-capped peaks. While it may seem like an absurd premise, the correlation between Amy Poehler's films and Mount Everest ascents is no laughing matter - well, actually, it is. But behind the humor lies an intriguing statistical connection worthy of contemplation and, dare we say, applause.

Our foray into this wacky world of data analysis began with a hearty chuckle and a skeptical eyebrow raise. Who would have thought that the whims of Hollywood could intertwine with the ambition of mountaineers? As we embark on this scholarly expedition, our goal is not just to elicit laughs but to dive into the realm of statistical relationships, shedding light on the interplay between the reel world and the real world. So, buckle up and get ready for a ride filled with puns, plots, and peaks as we uncover the surprising link between the number of movies featuring Amy Poehler and the successful conquests of the world's tallest summit.

Just as high-altitude climbers carefully plan their routes, we too have charted our course through a myriad of movie databases and statistical analyses. Donning our "statistical sherpa" hats, we delved into the troves of cinematic gems and data sets, navigating the treacherous terrain of correlation coefficients and p-values. Our findings, which we guarantee will elicit more than a few smiles, reveal a relationship that is as improbable as it is statistically significant, proving that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction - or should we say, stranger than comedy?

So, don't let the seriousness of academic research cloud the fun - after all, it's not every day that researchers get to comb through movie archives in the pursuit of scientific inquiry. Join us as we uncover the Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents, and remember, even in the world of academia, a little humor goes a long way. As we delve into this hilariously mind-boggling correlation, we invite you to sit back, relax, and ponder the thought: could a good laugh be the ultimate catalyst for conquering the world's mightiest peaks?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing Matters: The Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we take a humorous peek at the impact of actress Amy Poehler's filmography on the successful conquest of Mount Everest. By leveraging data from The Movie DB and CBC, we unearth a surprising correlation that tickles the funny bone. Our findings reveal a statistically significant relationship between the number of movies in which Amy Poehler appeared and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8270590 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1996 to 2011. Through our unconventional approach, we shed light on the whimsical interplay between popular culture and extreme athletic achievements, proving that comedy may indeed be the best altitude adjustment. So, next time you're summiting a mountain, don't forget to pack your favorite comedy flick - it might just give you the "Parks and Recreation" you need to reach the top!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Laughter is the best medicine, they say, but could it also be the best climber's aid? In this comically unconventional research paper, we set out to explore an unexpected relationship between the silver screen and towering snow-capped peaks. While it may seem like an absurd premise, the correlation between Amy Poehler's films and Mount Everest ascents is no laughing matter - well, actually, it is. But behind the humor lies an intriguing statistical connection worthy of contemplation and, dare we say, applause.
Our foray into this wacky world of data analysis began with a hearty chuckle and a skeptical eyebrow raise. Who would have thought that the whims of Hollywood could intertwine with the ambition of mountaineers? As we embark on this scholarly expedition, our goal is not just to elicit laughs but to dive into the realm of statistical relationships, shedding light on the interplay between the reel world and the real world. So, buckle up and get ready for a ride filled with puns, plots, and peaks as we uncover the surprising link between the number of movies featuring Amy Poehler and the successful conquests of the world's tallest summit.
Just as high-altitude climbers carefully plan their routes, we too have charted our course through a myriad of movie databases and statistical analyses. Donning our "statistical sherpa" hats, we delved into the troves of cinematic gems and data sets, navigating the treacherous terrain of correlation coefficients and p-values. Our findings, which we guarantee will elicit more than a few smiles, reveal a relationship that is as improbable as it is statistically significant, proving that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction - or should we say, stranger than comedy?
So, don't let the seriousness of academic research cloud the fun - after all, it's not every day that researchers get to comb through movie archives in the pursuit of scientific inquiry. Join us as we uncover the Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents, and remember, even in the world of academia, a little humor goes a long way. As we delve into this hilariously mind-boggling correlation, we invite you to sit back, relax, and ponder the thought: could a good laugh be the ultimate catalyst for conquering the world's mightiest peaks?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Mount Everest Ascents: A Statistical Analysis," Smith et al. offer a comprehensive examination of the various factors influencing successful climbs of the world's highest peak. The study rigorously assesses the impact of both environmental and climber-related variables, providing valuable insights into the intricate web of determinants that contribute to summit success. Conversely, in "The Role of Filmography in Extreme Athletic Achievements," Doe delves into the realm of popular culture and its potential effects on physical prowess, albeit focusing on an array of sports rather than mountaineering specifically. Furthermore, Jones et al. examine the correlation between celebrity influence and extraordinary feats in "Stardom and Tremendous Triumphs: An Unconventional Study." These serious-minded resources form the foundation upon which we build our irresistibly entertaining investigation into the peculiar relationship between Amy Poehler's film appearances and the conquest of Mount Everest.

Turning to non-fiction works, "Into Thin Air" by Jon Krakauer and "The Climb: Tragic Ambitions on Everest" by Anatoli Boukreev shed light on the daunting challenges faced by climbers on Mount Everest, elucidating the perilous nature of high-altitude expeditions. In a tangentially related context, "Yes Please" by Amy Poehler provides humorous insights into the actress's personal life and career, although regrettably, it offers no direct commentary on mountainous adventures. On the fiction front, "Summit Fever" by Andrew Greig and "The Mountain Story" by Lori Lansens offer gripping narratives that juxtapose the allure of high-altitude pursuits with the complexities of human relationships, albeit serving as fictitious accounts rather than empirical investigations.

As we venture into the unexpected territory of analyzing the correlation between Amy Poehler's cinematic ventures and Himalayan triumphs, it becomes apparent that our research requires a touch of unconventional inspiration. Thus, we unabashedly confess to browsing through episodes of "Saturday Night Live" and "Parks and Recreation" in the name of scholarly inquiry, seeking the whimsical essence that Ms. Poehler brings to her performances. It is within the bounds of this seemingly audacious yet undeniably enlightening exploration that we uncover the inimitable connection between laughter-inducing films and the adrenaline-filled conquests of Mount Everest. So, take a moment to ponder the paradoxical interplay between comedy and climbing, and remember, when navigating the peaks and valleys of statistical analyses, a touch of levity may just prove to be the ultimate peak performance enhancer.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from The Movie DB and CBC . You used data from 1996 to 2011

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing Matters: The Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we take a humorous peek at the impact of actress Amy Poehler's filmography on the successful conquest of Mount Everest. By leveraging data from The Movie DB and CBC, we unearth a surprising correlation that tickles the funny bone. Our findings reveal a statistically significant relationship between the number of movies in which Amy Poehler appeared and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8270590 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1996 to 2011. Through our unconventional approach, we shed light on the whimsical interplay between popular culture and extreme athletic achievements, proving that comedy may indeed be the best altitude adjustment. So, next time you're summiting a mountain, don't forget to pack your favorite comedy flick - it might just give you the "Parks and Recreation" you need to reach the top!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Laughter is the best medicine, they say, but could it also be the best climber's aid? In this comically unconventional research paper, we set out to explore an unexpected relationship between the silver screen and towering snow-capped peaks. While it may seem like an absurd premise, the correlation between Amy Poehler's films and Mount Everest ascents is no laughing matter - well, actually, it is. But behind the humor lies an intriguing statistical connection worthy of contemplation and, dare we say, applause.
Our foray into this wacky world of data analysis began with a hearty chuckle and a skeptical eyebrow raise. Who would have thought that the whims of Hollywood could intertwine with the ambition of mountaineers? As we embark on this scholarly expedition, our goal is not just to elicit laughs but to dive into the realm of statistical relationships, shedding light on the interplay between the reel world and the real world. So, buckle up and get ready for a ride filled with puns, plots, and peaks as we uncover the surprising link between the number of movies featuring Amy Poehler and the successful conquests of the world's tallest summit.
Just as high-altitude climbers carefully plan their routes, we too have charted our course through a myriad of movie databases and statistical analyses. Donning our "statistical sherpa" hats, we delved into the troves of cinematic gems and data sets, navigating the treacherous terrain of correlation coefficients and p-values. Our findings, which we guarantee will elicit more than a few smiles, reveal a relationship that is as improbable as it is statistically significant, proving that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction - or should we say, stranger than comedy?
So, don't let the seriousness of academic research cloud the fun - after all, it's not every day that researchers get to comb through movie archives in the pursuit of scientific inquiry. Join us as we uncover the Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents, and remember, even in the world of academia, a little humor goes a long way. As we delve into this hilariously mind-boggling correlation, we invite you to sit back, relax, and ponder the thought: could a good laugh be the ultimate catalyst for conquering the world's mightiest peaks?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To dissect the peculiar association between Amy Poehler's cinematic presence and the elation of Mount Everest conquerors, our research team embarked on a rollicking journey through a mountain of data collection and statistical scrutiny. Our intriguing approach began with the assembly of a comprehensive dataset sourced from The Movie DB and CBC, encompassing the years 1996 to 2011. After all, what better way to explore the nexus of hilarity and Himalayan heights than by scrutinizing the celluloid exploits of a comedic luminary and the triumphs of intrepid mountaineers?

In a bid to capture the essence of this unconventional inquiry, our research design bore the charming idiosyncrasies of a Wes Anderson film. We meticulously tallied the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs for each year and cross-referenced it with the count of movies in which Amy Poehler made an appearance. Employing our very own blend of "laugh-ometrics," we exuberantly quantified the magnitude of laughter-inducing influence emanating from the silver screen and how it intertwines with the raw determination of Everest aspirants.

The heart of our eccentric methodology lay in the jocular juggling of statistical analyses, where we adopted the personas of empirical jesters donning coattails of confidence intervals and hats of hypothesis testing. Through the droll dance of correlation calculations, we sought to decipher the tango of laughter and triumph as it unfolded in the whimsical world of data points and regression lines.

However, to navigate the winding road of inquiry with the requisite whimsy, we must confess to a quirky blend of Excel acrobatics and Python pirouettes, as we harnessed the prowess of spreadsheets and programming prowess to execute our analytical extravaganza. Our eccentric foray led us through the labyrinthine corridors of data manipulation and visualization, where we choreographed a visually arresting display of charts and graphs, not unlike a slapstick ballet of statistical storytelling.

In essence, our approach to unraveling the Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents can be likened to a delightfully disorienting carnival ride, replete with a sense of uncertainty, amusement, and a palpable yearning for the truth behind the laughter. So, with our whimsical methodology firmly in place, we set out to marry the mirth of cinematic wonder with the grandeur of human triumph, standing at the crossroads of comedy and conquest with nothing but a clown nose and a compass to guide us.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from The Movie DB and CBC .

For the time period 1996 to 2011, you found a correlation 0.8270590, r-squared of 0.6840267, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing Matters: The Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we take a humorous peek at the impact of actress Amy Poehler's filmography on the successful conquest of Mount Everest. By leveraging data from The Movie DB and CBC, we unearth a surprising correlation that tickles the funny bone. Our findings reveal a statistically significant relationship between the number of movies in which Amy Poehler appeared and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8270590 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1996 to 2011. Through our unconventional approach, we shed light on the whimsical interplay between popular culture and extreme athletic achievements, proving that comedy may indeed be the best altitude adjustment. So, next time you're summiting a mountain, don't forget to pack your favorite comedy flick - it might just give you the "Parks and Recreation" you need to reach the top!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
Laughter is the best medicine, they say, but could it also be the best climber's aid? In this comically unconventional research paper, we set out to explore an unexpected relationship between the silver screen and towering snow-capped peaks. While it may seem like an absurd premise, the correlation between Amy Poehler's films and Mount Everest ascents is no laughing matter - well, actually, it is. But behind the humor lies an intriguing statistical connection worthy of contemplation and, dare we say, applause.
Our foray into this wacky world of data analysis began with a hearty chuckle and a skeptical eyebrow raise. Who would have thought that the whims of Hollywood could intertwine with the ambition of mountaineers? As we embark on this scholarly expedition, our goal is not just to elicit laughs but to dive into the realm of statistical relationships, shedding light on the interplay between the reel world and the real world. So, buckle up and get ready for a ride filled with puns, plots, and peaks as we uncover the surprising link between the number of movies featuring Amy Poehler and the successful conquests of the world's tallest summit.
Just as high-altitude climbers carefully plan their routes, we too have charted our course through a myriad of movie databases and statistical analyses. Donning our "statistical sherpa" hats, we delved into the troves of cinematic gems and data sets, navigating the treacherous terrain of correlation coefficients and p-values. Our findings, which we guarantee will elicit more than a few smiles, reveal a relationship that is as improbable as it is statistically significant, proving that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction - or should we say, stranger than comedy?
So, don't let the seriousness of academic research cloud the fun - after all, it's not every day that researchers get to comb through movie archives in the pursuit of scientific inquiry. Join us as we uncover the Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents, and remember, even in the world of academia, a little humor goes a long way. As we delve into this hilariously mind-boggling correlation, we invite you to sit back, relax, and ponder the thought: could a good laugh be the ultimate catalyst for conquering the world's mightiest peaks?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our data analysis yielded a remarkable correlation between the number of movies featuring Amy Poehler and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs during the period from 1996 to 2011. The correlation coefficient of 0.8270590 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, suggesting a curious intertwining of cinematic entertainment and alpine triumph.

With an r-squared value of 0.6840267, we observed that approximately 68.4% of the variability in the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs can be explained by the number of movies in which Amy Poehler appeared. This robust relationship between the two variables provided compelling evidence of the impact of comedic prowess on the conquest of formidable peaks.

The statistical significance of our findings was further underscored by the p-value, which was less than 0.01. This indicates that the correlation between Amy Poehler's filmography and Mount Everest ascents is highly unlikely to have occurred by mere chance, reinforcing the validity of our results and the unexpected nature of this correlation.

In Figure 1, the scatterplot visualizes the strong positive correlation, depicting a clear upward trend as the number of Amy Poehler's movie appearances increases, coinciding with a rise in the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs. The visual representation of this relationship serves as a compelling testament to the surprising connection between laughter-inducing performances and the triumphs atop the world's tallest summit.

Our results illuminate a peculiar yet undeniable bond between the works of a celebrated comedic actress and the extraordinary feats of mountaineers, showcasing the whimsical interplay between popular culture and awe-inspiring accomplishments. The statistical evidence uncovered in this research not only broadens our understanding of the unexpected influences that shape human endeavors but also invites a lighthearted contemplation of the role of mirth in defying monumental challenges.

In elucidating the Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents, our findings underscore the multidimensional nature of human achievement, reinforcing the adage that a good laugh may indeed be the best ascent aid. These results challenge conventional notions and beckon researchers and enthusiasts alike to appreciate the comically captivating nuances within the realm of statistical relationships. So, as we revel in the revelatory hilarity of our findings, we extend the invitation to embrace the unexpected and explore the profound hilarity that unfurls amidst the intermingling of cinema and conquest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Laughing Matters: The Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we take a humorous peek at the impact of actress Amy Poehler's filmography on the successful conquest of Mount Everest. By leveraging data from The Movie DB and CBC, we unearth a surprising correlation that tickles the funny bone. Our findings reveal a statistically significant relationship between the number of movies in which Amy Poehler appeared and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8270590 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1996 to 2011. Through our unconventional approach, we shed light on the whimsical interplay between popular culture and extreme athletic achievements, proving that comedy may indeed be the best altitude adjustment. So, next time you're summiting a mountain, don't forget to pack your favorite comedy flick - it might just give you the "Parks and Recreation" you need to reach the top!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Mount Everest Ascents: A Statistical Analysis," Smith et al. offer a comprehensive examination of the various factors influencing successful climbs of the world's highest peak. The study rigorously assesses the impact of both environmental and climber-related variables, providing valuable insights into the intricate web of determinants that contribute to summit success. Conversely, in "The Role of Filmography in Extreme Athletic Achievements," Doe delves into the realm of popular culture and its potential effects on physical prowess, albeit focusing on an array of sports rather than mountaineering specifically. Furthermore, Jones et al. examine the correlation between celebrity influence and extraordinary feats in "Stardom and Tremendous Triumphs: An Unconventional Study." These serious-minded resources form the foundation upon which we build our irresistibly entertaining investigation into the peculiar relationship between Amy Poehler's film appearances and the conquest of Mount Everest.
Turning to non-fiction works, "Into Thin Air" by Jon Krakauer and "The Climb: Tragic Ambitions on Everest" by Anatoli Boukreev shed light on the daunting challenges faced by climbers on Mount Everest, elucidating the perilous nature of high-altitude expeditions. In a tangentially related context, "Yes Please" by Amy Poehler provides humorous insights into the actress's personal life and career, although regrettably, it offers no direct commentary on mountainous adventures. On the fiction front, "Summit Fever" by Andrew Greig and "The Mountain Story" by Lori Lansens offer gripping narratives that juxtapose the allure of high-altitude pursuits with the complexities of human relationships, albeit serving as fictitious accounts rather than empirical investigations.
As we venture into the unexpected territory of analyzing the correlation between Amy Poehler's cinematic ventures and Himalayan triumphs, it becomes apparent that our research requires a touch of unconventional inspiration. Thus, we unabashedly confess to browsing through episodes of "Saturday Night Live" and "Parks and Recreation" in the name of scholarly inquiry, seeking the whimsical essence that Ms. Poehler brings to her performances. It is within the bounds of this seemingly audacious yet undeniably enlightening exploration that we uncover the inimitable connection between laughter-inducing films and the adrenaline-filled conquests of Mount Everest. So, take a moment to ponder the paradoxical interplay between comedy and climbing, and remember, when navigating the peaks and valleys of statistical analyses, a touch of levity may just prove to be the ultimate peak performance enhancer.

[[RESULTS]]
Our data analysis yielded a remarkable correlation between the number of movies featuring Amy Poehler and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs during the period from 1996 to 2011. The correlation coefficient of 0.8270590 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, suggesting a curious intertwining of cinematic entertainment and alpine triumph.
With an r-squared value of 0.6840267, we observed that approximately 68.4% of the variability in the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs can be explained by the number of movies in which Amy Poehler appeared. This robust relationship between the two variables provided compelling evidence of the impact of comedic prowess on the conquest of formidable peaks.
The statistical significance of our findings was further underscored by the p-value, which was less than 0.01. This indicates that the correlation between Amy Poehler's filmography and Mount Everest ascents is highly unlikely to have occurred by mere chance, reinforcing the validity of our results and the unexpected nature of this correlation.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot visualizes the strong positive correlation, depicting a clear upward trend as the number of Amy Poehler's movie appearances increases, coinciding with a rise in the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs. The visual representation of this relationship serves as a compelling testament to the surprising connection between laughter-inducing performances and the triumphs atop the world's tallest summit.
Our results illuminate a peculiar yet undeniable bond between the works of a celebrated comedic actress and the extraordinary feats of mountaineers, showcasing the whimsical interplay between popular culture and awe-inspiring accomplishments. The statistical evidence uncovered in this research not only broadens our understanding of the unexpected influences that shape human endeavors but also invites a lighthearted contemplation of the role of mirth in defying monumental challenges.
In elucidating the Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents, our findings underscore the multidimensional nature of human achievement, reinforcing the adage that a good laugh may indeed be the best ascent aid. These results challenge conventional notions and beckon researchers and enthusiasts alike to appreciate the comically captivating nuances within the realm of statistical relationships. So, as we revel in the revelatory hilarity of our findings, we extend the invitation to embrace the unexpected and explore the profound hilarity that unfurls amidst the intermingling of cinema and conquest.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

Ah, the unassuming interplay between Amy Poehler's film appearances and Mount Everest triumphs - a comedic saga that has left even the most astute researchers scratching their heads in befuddlement! The amalgamation of statistical analyses with the whimsy of popular culture has indeed birthed an unconventional, yet undeniably fascinating tale.

In heeding the sage advice of Smith et al. and the whimsical musings of Doe and Jones, we delved into uncharted territory, investigating the seemingly incongruous correlation between cinematic laughter and alpine conquest. Lo and behold, our findings not only corroborated their scholarly insights but escalated the chuckle-inducing revelation to soaring heights.

Our statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8270590 between Amy Poehler's filmography and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs from 1996 to 2011 extends a triumphant high-five to the lighthearted forces at play. Through our rigorous data analysis, we added a twist of statistical rigor to the chuckle-inducing concoction, affirming that laughter is indeed an alluring catalyst for scaling great heights.

The r-squared value of 0.6840267 signifies that a whopping 68.4% of the variability in the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs can be attributed to the sheer presence of Amy Poehler on the silver screen. Such findings tantalizingly align with the charismatic nature of comedy, where unpredictability begets uproarious results, and the allure of statistical relationships lends an air of intellectual whimsy to the otherwise gravity-defying summit conquests.

And let's not overlook the cherry atop this lighthearted statistical sundae - our p-value of less than 0.01. This darling little figure not only saunters in with an air of statistical significance but winks mischievously, affirming that the connection between Amy Poehler's on-screen antics and Everest ascents is no mere whimsical flight of fancy.

With our scatterplot painting a vivid panorama of the buoyant correlation, we solidified this connection in a display of visual whimsy, proving that even in the serious realm of data-driven research, a dash of thespian laughter can cast a definitive spell.

So, as we wrap ourselves in the uproarious wonder that is the Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents, we implore fellow researchers to embrace the comical vivacity within the realm of statistical scrutiny. For it is in this delightful collaboration between the mirthful world of cinema and the lofty pinnacles of mountaineering that we uncover an authentic and unapologetically funny appreciation for the unexpected influences that shape our towering triumphs. Let us delight in this laughter-laden revelation, and as we part ways, I leave you with this thought: Sometimes, statistical analyses can be a laughing matter indeed!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing Matters: The Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we take a humorous peek at the impact of actress Amy Poehler's filmography on the successful conquest of Mount Everest. By leveraging data from The Movie DB and CBC, we unearth a surprising correlation that tickles the funny bone. Our findings reveal a statistically significant relationship between the number of movies in which Amy Poehler appeared and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8270590 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1996 to 2011. Through our unconventional approach, we shed light on the whimsical interplay between popular culture and extreme athletic achievements, proving that comedy may indeed be the best altitude adjustment. So, next time you're summiting a mountain, don't forget to pack your favorite comedy flick - it might just give you the "Parks and Recreation" you need to reach the top!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
Laughter is the best medicine, they say, but could it also be the best climber's aid? In this comically unconventional research paper, we set out to explore an unexpected relationship between the silver screen and towering snow-capped peaks. While it may seem like an absurd premise, the correlation between Amy Poehler's films and Mount Everest ascents is no laughing matter - well, actually, it is. But behind the humor lies an intriguing statistical connection worthy of contemplation and, dare we say, applause.
Our foray into this wacky world of data analysis began with a hearty chuckle and a skeptical eyebrow raise. Who would have thought that the whims of Hollywood could intertwine with the ambition of mountaineers? As we embark on this scholarly expedition, our goal is not just to elicit laughs but to dive into the realm of statistical relationships, shedding light on the interplay between the reel world and the real world. So, buckle up and get ready for a ride filled with puns, plots, and peaks as we uncover the surprising link between the number of movies featuring Amy Poehler and the successful conquests of the world's tallest summit.
Just as high-altitude climbers carefully plan their routes, we too have charted our course through a myriad of movie databases and statistical analyses. Donning our "statistical sherpa" hats, we delved into the troves of cinematic gems and data sets, navigating the treacherous terrain of correlation coefficients and p-values. Our findings, which we guarantee will elicit more than a few smiles, reveal a relationship that is as improbable as it is statistically significant, proving that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction - or should we say, stranger than comedy?
So, don't let the seriousness of academic research cloud the fun - after all, it's not every day that researchers get to comb through movie archives in the pursuit of scientific inquiry. Join us as we uncover the Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents, and remember, even in the world of academia, a little humor goes a long way. As we delve into this hilariously mind-boggling correlation, we invite you to sit back, relax, and ponder the thought: could a good laugh be the ultimate catalyst for conquering the world's mightiest peaks?

[[RESULTS]]
Our data analysis yielded a remarkable correlation between the number of movies featuring Amy Poehler and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs during the period from 1996 to 2011. The correlation coefficient of 0.8270590 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, suggesting a curious intertwining of cinematic entertainment and alpine triumph.
With an r-squared value of 0.6840267, we observed that approximately 68.4% of the variability in the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs can be explained by the number of movies in which Amy Poehler appeared. This robust relationship between the two variables provided compelling evidence of the impact of comedic prowess on the conquest of formidable peaks.
The statistical significance of our findings was further underscored by the p-value, which was less than 0.01. This indicates that the correlation between Amy Poehler's filmography and Mount Everest ascents is highly unlikely to have occurred by mere chance, reinforcing the validity of our results and the unexpected nature of this correlation.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot visualizes the strong positive correlation, depicting a clear upward trend as the number of Amy Poehler's movie appearances increases, coinciding with a rise in the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs. The visual representation of this relationship serves as a compelling testament to the surprising connection between laughter-inducing performances and the triumphs atop the world's tallest summit.
Our results illuminate a peculiar yet undeniable bond between the works of a celebrated comedic actress and the extraordinary feats of mountaineers, showcasing the whimsical interplay between popular culture and awe-inspiring accomplishments. The statistical evidence uncovered in this research not only broadens our understanding of the unexpected influences that shape human endeavors but also invites a lighthearted contemplation of the role of mirth in defying monumental challenges.
In elucidating the Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents, our findings underscore the multidimensional nature of human achievement, reinforcing the adage that a good laugh may indeed be the best ascent aid. These results challenge conventional notions and beckon researchers and enthusiasts alike to appreciate the comically captivating nuances within the realm of statistical relationships. So, as we revel in the revelatory hilarity of our findings, we extend the invitation to embrace the unexpected and explore the profound hilarity that unfurls amidst the intermingling of cinema and conquest.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, it seems that Amy Poehler's comedic prowess extends beyond entertaining audiences to serving as a surprising muse for mountaineers. Our findings suggest that the more movies featuring Amy Poehler, the greater the number of successful Mt. Everest climbs. It's like her roles are reaching new heights - both metaphorically and literally!

As we wrap up this whimsically wild ride through statistical analysis, we can't help but marvel at the unexpected intertwining of Hollywood and high-altitude triumphs. It's as if comedy and conquering colossal peaks share a punchline that leaves us awe-struck.

Now, some may say our research is purely "peak" entertainment, but the statistically significant correlation we've uncovered begs to differ. From "Baby Mama" to "Parks and Recreation," each film seems to fuel the ascent of adventurers in a way that defies the conventional understanding of motivation and inspiration. It's a testament to the power of laughter - or perhaps a testament to the gravitational pull of Poehler's comedic genius.

And when we consider the scientific rigor that went into uncovering this oddball correlation, we can confidently say that our research is nothing short of a "climbing comedy." After all, it takes a special blend of data, humor, and statistical acumen to scale the heights of such unexpected revelations.

Now, you might be wondering if we plan to continue our exploration into the realm of celebrity influences on extreme sports. With the solid evidence we've presented, we can confidently assert that no further research is needed in this area. The numbers have spoken, and it seems that when it comes to conquering the world's tallest peaks, Amy Poehler truly is the "Queen of the Hill" - both on screen and off.

So, as we bid adieu to this pun-filled journey of correlation and comedy, we leave you with this parting thought: next time you're gearing up for an Everest ascent, don't forget to pack a few laughs along with your climbing gear. After all, a good joke might just be the oxygen boost you need to reach the summit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Laughing Matters: The Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Humor and High Altitudes


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Laughing Matters: The Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Humorous Altitude Research (SHAR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Laughing Matters: The Amy Poehler Effect on Everest Ascents with an abstract of In this groundbreaking study, we take a humorous peek at the impact of actress Amy Poehler's filmography on the successful conquest of Mount Everest. By leveraging data from The Movie DB and CBC, we unearth a surprising correlation that tickles the funny bone. Our findings reveal a statistically significant relationship between the number of movies in which Amy Poehler appeared and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8270590 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1996 to 2011. Through our unconventional approach, we shed light on the whimsical interplay between popular culture and extreme athletic achievements, proving that comedy may indeed be the best altitude adjustment. So, next time you're summiting a mountain, don't forget to pack your favorite comedy flick - it might just give you the "Parks and Recreation" you need to reach the top!

ChatGPT:

Amy Poehler, Mount Everest, filmography impact, The Movie DB, CBC, correlation, statistical relationship, comedy in extreme sports, popular culture, altitude adjustment, Parks and Recreation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in
Source: The Movie DB
Additional Info: Spring Breakdown (2009); Inside Out (2015); Saturday Night Live: The Best of Amy Poehler (2009); Sisters (2015); Hurricane of Fun: The Making of Wet Hot (2015); Mind Candy (2015); Never Before, Never Again: Behind the Scenes of Asssscat (2013); The House (2017); Wine Country (2019); A Parks and Recreation Special (2020); The Paley Center Salutes Parks and Recreation (2020); Baby Mama (2008); Asssscat (2007); Wild Girls Gone (2007); They Came Together (2014); Escape From a Wonderful Life (1996); Ugly Revenge (1998); Thank You, Del: The Story of the Del Close Marathon (2015); The Women of SNL (2010); The Unbelievably Sweet Alpacas (2014); Martin & Orloff (2002); Free Birds (2013); Are You Here (2013); Live from New York! (2015); Love, Gilda (2018); Norman Lear: 100 Years of Music and Laughter (2022); Blades of Glory (2007); Mr. Woodcock (2007); A.C.O.D. (2013); Tenacious D: For the Ladies (2007); Envy (2004); Freak Dance (2010); SpongeBob SquarePants: Where's Gary? (2005); First Time Female Director (2023); Don Rickles: One Night Only (2014); Kelly Clarkson Presents: When Christmas Comes Around (2021); Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel (2009); Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked (2011); Hoodwinked Too! Hood VS. Evil (2011); The Ex (2006); Man of the Year (2006); Horton Hears a Who! (2008); Tenacious D in The Pick of Destiny (2006); Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo (1999); A Very Murray Christmas (2015); The Making of 'The Pick of Destiny' (2007); Moxie (2021); On Broadway (2007); Monsters vs Aliens (2009); Norman Lear: Just Another Version of You (2016); Comedy Central Roast of Rob Lowe (2016); Mean Girls (2004); Betty White's 90th Birthday: A Tribute to America's Golden Girl (2012); Hamlet 2 (2008); Saturday Night Live Backstage (2011); Carol Burnett: 90 Years of Laughter + Love (2023); Wet Hot American Summer (2001); Tomorrow Night (1998); Riley's First Date? (2015); Fight for Your Right Revisited (2011); Shrek the Third (2007); Wake Up, Ron Burgundy: The Lost Movie (2004); Julia Louis-Dreyfus: The Kennedy Center Mark Twain Prize (2018); Southland Tales (2006); Shortcut to Happiness (2003); A Saturday Night Live Christmas Special (2023); Stronger Together, Tous Ensemble (2020); Saturday Night Live: 40th Anniversary Special (2015); Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues (2013); One World: Together at Home (2020)

See what else correlates with The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in

Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs
Source: CBC
See what else correlates with Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs

Correlation r = 0.8270590 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6840267 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in) over the 16 years from 1996 through 2011.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.8E-5. 0.0000775021518432468600000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.0078% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 12,903 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.56, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011
The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in (Movie appearances)1021011131483424
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs (Climbers)9585121118145182159267337307493633423457543542




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,0,2,1,0,1,1,1,3,1,4,8,3,4,2,4,])
array_2 = np.array([95,85,121,118,145,182,159,267,337,307,493,633,423,457,543,542,])
array_1_name = "The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in"
array_2_name = "Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 5864 · Black Variable ID: 26500 · Red Variable ID: 498
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0