about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,846 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in and the second variable is The number of firefighters in South Dakota.  The chart goes from 2010 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Margot Robbie's career blazed like a wildfire in Hollywood, her on-screen presence ignited a spark of inspiration in South Dakota. It's as if her performances were giving off heat, leading more people to feel the call to serve their community and extinguish fires. It's a reel mystery how her movie roles could fan the flames of interest in firefighting, but it seems that her star power was just too hot to handle, prompting an outpouring of new recruits who were ready to rescue the state from any film-ergency. It's almost as if the more Margot, the merrier the firefighting force became, proving that in the movie of life, she was the unexpected leading lady of fire safety in South Dakota.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Disney Movie: A small South Dakota town is adorned with a warm glow, showcasing a charming movie theater with a classic marquee proudly displaying Margot Robbie's filmography. Across the street stands a rustic fire station, where a group of dedicated firefighters gather, their numbers increasing with the arrival of new recruits. The scene exudes a sense of community and growth, encapsulating the parallel rise of Margot Robbie's illustrious movie career and the blossoming firefighting force in South Dakota. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in and The number of firefighters in South Dakota. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Parallax art Concept art a Polaroid photo Cute cartoon An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Disney Movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in and The number of firefighters in South Dakota, in the following situation: As Margot Robbie's career blazed like a wildfire in Hollywood, her on-screen presence ignited a spark of inspiration in South Dakota. It's as if her performances were giving off heat, leading more people to feel the call to serve their community and extinguish fires. It's a reel mystery how her movie roles could fan the flames of interest in firefighting, but it seems that her star power was just too hot to handle, prompting an outpouring of new recruits who were ready to rescue the state from any film-ergency. It's almost as if the more Margot, the merrier the firefighting force became, proving that in the movie of life, she was the unexpected leading lady of fire safety in South Dakota.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small South Dakota town, a movie theater marquee proudly displays Margot Robbie's filmography, showcasing the numerous movies she has starred in. Meanwhile, just across the street, a group of firefighters gather outside the fire station, their numbers increasing as new recruits eagerly join the team. The scene perfectly captures the simultaneous rise of both Margot Robbie's movie career and the growing firefighting force in South Dakota, symbolizing the unexpected connection between Hollywood glamour and the call to serve the community.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: In a small South Dakota town, a movie theater marquee proudly displays Margot Robbie's filmography, showcasing the numerous movies she has starred in. Meanwhile, just across the street, a group of firefighters gather outside the fire station, their numbers increasing as new recruits eagerly join the team. The scene perfectly captures the simultaneous rise of both Margot Robbie's movie career and the growing firefighting force in South Dakota, symbolizing the unexpected connection between Hollywood glamour and the call to serve the community. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Disney Movie: A small South Dakota town is adorned with a warm glow, showcasing a charming movie theater with a classic marquee proudly displaying Margot Robbie's filmography. Across the street stands a rustic fire station, where a group of dedicated firefighters gather, their numbers increasing with the arrival of new recruits. The scene exudes a sense of community and growth, encapsulating the parallel rise of Margot Robbie's illustrious movie career and the blossoming firefighting force in South Dakota.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in caused The number of firefighters in South Dakota to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Robbie on Fire: Exploring the Correlation between Margot Robbie's Film Appearances and Firefighter Numbers in South Dakota

The Journal of Celestial Cinematic Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in and The number of firefighters in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from The Movie DB and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8741312 and p < 0.01 for 2010 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Robbie on Fire: Exploring the Correlation between Margot Robbie's Film Appearances and Firefighter Numbers in South Dakota"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the often-overlooked relationship between the cinematic presence of Margot Robbie and the labor force of firefighters in the state of South Dakota. By utilizing data from The Movie DB and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to uncover any potential correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8741312 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2010 to 2022. The implications of this surprising correlation prompt a closer examination of the interplay between cultural phenomena and labor trends, challenging conventional wisdom and encouraging a more holistic understanding of societal dynamics. With these results, we aim to ignite further discourse and exploration of unconventional factors that may influence labor dynamics, adding a spark of curiosity to the realm of statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in and The number of firefighters in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Robbie on Fire: Exploring the Correlation between Margot Robbie's Film Appearances and Firefighter Numbers in South Dakota"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the often-overlooked relationship between the cinematic presence of Margot Robbie and the labor force of firefighters in the state of South Dakota. By utilizing data from The Movie DB and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to uncover any potential correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8741312 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2010 to 2022. The implications of this surprising correlation prompt a closer examination of the interplay between cultural phenomena and labor trends, challenging conventional wisdom and encouraging a more holistic understanding of societal dynamics. With these results, we aim to ignite further discourse and exploration of unconventional factors that may influence labor dynamics, adding a spark of curiosity to the realm of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of statistical analysis often uncovers unexpected and puzzling relationships, much like stumbling upon a lost sock in the dryer. Our study delves into the enigmatic correlation between the filmography of Margot Robbie and the number of firefighters in the state of South Dakota. While at first glance, these two variables may seem about as related as a pineapple and a bicycle, our research endeavors to untangle the web of connections that exist in the intricate fabric of societal dynamics.

Margot Robbie, a talented and versatile actress, has captured the hearts of many with her captivating performances in numerous films. Meanwhile, the dedicated men and women of the firefighting profession bravely protect and serve their communities. What, one may ponder, could possibly link the onscreen charisma of Margot Robbie with the valiant efforts of South Dakota's noble firefighters? It is indeed a mystery worthy of Sherlock Holmes' most astute scrutiny.

The state of South Dakota, known for its picturesque landscapes and the iconic Mount Rushmore, has also experienced fluctuations in its firefighting workforce over the years. Our research aims to shed light on the puzzling dynamics that underlie the vicissitudes in this particular labor sector and to explore whether Margot Robbie's escalating cinematic presence exerts any discernible influence.

Guided by the ever-curious spirit of scientific inquiry, we embarked on this whimsical yet serious venture, armed with the tools of data analysis and statistical rigor. Our findings promise to challenge preconceived notions and add a splash of intrigue to the often austere world of labor statistics. Join us on this whimsical journey as we unravel the mysteries of "Robbie on Fire," blending serious research with a sprinkle of whimsy. After all, in the grand theater of life, who's to say there isn't room for a little unexpected drama?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in and The number of firefighters in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Robbie on Fire: Exploring the Correlation between Margot Robbie's Film Appearances and Firefighter Numbers in South Dakota"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the often-overlooked relationship between the cinematic presence of Margot Robbie and the labor force of firefighters in the state of South Dakota. By utilizing data from The Movie DB and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to uncover any potential correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8741312 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2010 to 2022. The implications of this surprising correlation prompt a closer examination of the interplay between cultural phenomena and labor trends, challenging conventional wisdom and encouraging a more holistic understanding of societal dynamics. With these results, we aim to ignite further discourse and exploration of unconventional factors that may influence labor dynamics, adding a spark of curiosity to the realm of statistical analysis.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of statistical analysis often uncovers unexpected and puzzling relationships, much like stumbling upon a lost sock in the dryer. Our study delves into the enigmatic correlation between the filmography of Margot Robbie and the number of firefighters in the state of South Dakota. While at first glance, these two variables may seem about as related as a pineapple and a bicycle, our research endeavors to untangle the web of connections that exist in the intricate fabric of societal dynamics.
Margot Robbie, a talented and versatile actress, has captured the hearts of many with her captivating performances in numerous films. Meanwhile, the dedicated men and women of the firefighting profession bravely protect and serve their communities. What, one may ponder, could possibly link the onscreen charisma of Margot Robbie with the valiant efforts of South Dakota's noble firefighters? It is indeed a mystery worthy of Sherlock Holmes' most astute scrutiny.
The state of South Dakota, known for its picturesque landscapes and the iconic Mount Rushmore, has also experienced fluctuations in its firefighting workforce over the years. Our research aims to shed light on the puzzling dynamics that underlie the vicissitudes in this particular labor sector and to explore whether Margot Robbie's escalating cinematic presence exerts any discernible influence.
Guided by the ever-curious spirit of scientific inquiry, we embarked on this whimsical yet serious venture, armed with the tools of data analysis and statistical rigor. Our findings promise to challenge preconceived notions and add a splash of intrigue to the often austere world of labor statistics. Join us on this whimsical journey as we unravel the mysteries of "Robbie on Fire," blending serious research with a sprinkle of whimsy. After all, in the grand theater of life, who's to say there isn't room for a little unexpected drama?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Existing literature on the relationship between cultural phenomena and labor trends has primarily focused on more traditional indicators, such as economic policies, technological advancements, and demographic shifts. However, our investigation into the puzzling correlation between Margot Robbie's film appearances and the number of firefighters in South Dakota uncovers a lesser-explored dimension of this complex interplay.

In "Labor Economics" by George J. Borjas, the authors emphasize the significance of demographic factors and government policies in shaping labor dynamics. While this seminal work sheds light on conventional influencers, it remains silent on the potential impact of Hollywood stardom on the labor force. Similarly, Smith and Jones in "Economic Drivers of Labor Trends" explore the role of education and skills in workforce composition, providing valuable insights but overlooking the enchanting allure of the silver screen.

Turning to literary works that explore societal influences, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers a quirky investigation into unexpected correlations, sparking our own whimsical pursuit for unconventional connections. Meanwhile, in "Outliers: The Story of Success" by Malcolm Gladwell, the exploration of hidden patterns and outliers serves as a source of inspiration for our offbeat inquiry into the unexpected affinity between cinema and firefighting.

On a less serious note, works of fiction such as Ray Bradbury's "Fahrenheit 451" and Joseph Heller's "Catch-22" offer fictionalized portrayals of firefighting and military service, respectively, albeit in vastly different contexts. These literary departures, while not directly related to our study, demonstrate the diverse portrayals of occupations and offer a reminder of the unexpected twists that can arise when delving into societal dynamics.

Drawing inspiration from unexpected sources, our exploration also takes cues from board games like "Flash Point: Fire Rescue," serving as a reminder that unexpected fires can break out in the most unlikely of places – much like the unexpected correlation our study uncovers.

As we navigate the uncharted waters of correlation between Margot Robbie's cinematic presence and South Dakota's firefighting workforce, our study aims to infuse a dose of levity into the often-dry realm of labor statistics, combining scholarly rigor with a dash of humor and unexpected discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in and The number of firefighters in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from The Movie DB and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2010 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Robbie on Fire: Exploring the Correlation between Margot Robbie's Film Appearances and Firefighter Numbers in South Dakota"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the often-overlooked relationship between the cinematic presence of Margot Robbie and the labor force of firefighters in the state of South Dakota. By utilizing data from The Movie DB and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to uncover any potential correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8741312 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2010 to 2022. The implications of this surprising correlation prompt a closer examination of the interplay between cultural phenomena and labor trends, challenging conventional wisdom and encouraging a more holistic understanding of societal dynamics. With these results, we aim to ignite further discourse and exploration of unconventional factors that may influence labor dynamics, adding a spark of curiosity to the realm of statistical analysis.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of statistical analysis often uncovers unexpected and puzzling relationships, much like stumbling upon a lost sock in the dryer. Our study delves into the enigmatic correlation between the filmography of Margot Robbie and the number of firefighters in the state of South Dakota. While at first glance, these two variables may seem about as related as a pineapple and a bicycle, our research endeavors to untangle the web of connections that exist in the intricate fabric of societal dynamics.
Margot Robbie, a talented and versatile actress, has captured the hearts of many with her captivating performances in numerous films. Meanwhile, the dedicated men and women of the firefighting profession bravely protect and serve their communities. What, one may ponder, could possibly link the onscreen charisma of Margot Robbie with the valiant efforts of South Dakota's noble firefighters? It is indeed a mystery worthy of Sherlock Holmes' most astute scrutiny.
The state of South Dakota, known for its picturesque landscapes and the iconic Mount Rushmore, has also experienced fluctuations in its firefighting workforce over the years. Our research aims to shed light on the puzzling dynamics that underlie the vicissitudes in this particular labor sector and to explore whether Margot Robbie's escalating cinematic presence exerts any discernible influence.
Guided by the ever-curious spirit of scientific inquiry, we embarked on this whimsical yet serious venture, armed with the tools of data analysis and statistical rigor. Our findings promise to challenge preconceived notions and add a splash of intrigue to the often austere world of labor statistics. Join us on this whimsical journey as we unravel the mysteries of "Robbie on Fire," blending serious research with a sprinkle of whimsy. After all, in the grand theater of life, who's to say there isn't room for a little unexpected drama?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To delve into the perplexing relationship between Margot Robbie's cinematic contributions and the number of firefighters in South Dakota, we employed a range of methods that were as diverse and eclectic as the filmography of the actress herself. Our approach encompassed data collection, statistical analysis, and a dash of whimsy, all aimed at shedding light on this seemingly incongruous correlation.

Data Collection:
Our research team scoured the virtual landscapes of the internet, sifting through a plethora of sources to assemble a comprehensive dataset spanning from 2010 to 2022. The backdrop for Margot Robbie's cinematic appearances was constructed using data from The Movie DB, an extensive repository of film-related information. Meanwhile, the rosters of South Dakota's valiant firefighters were extracted from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing the labor force foundation for our analysis.

Statistical Analysis:
With our dataset in hand, we set out to untangle the statistical intricacies that lay at the heart of our investigation. Employing advanced statistical techniques, including correlation analysis, regression modeling, and time series analysis, we endeavored to tease out any potential relationships between the number of Margot Robbie's film appearances and the count of firefighters in South Dakota. Our statistical toolbox was as robust and multifaceted as the characters brought to life by the talented actress.

Psychological Analysis (Kidding!):
In a whimsical departure from standard research practices, we even contemplated the possibility of employing a touch of psychological analysis to delve into the deeper emotional connections that viewers may have with Margot Robbie's performances and their subsequent impact on the decision to become a firefighter. However, in the wise words of our esteemed statistical advisor, "Let's not add fuel to the fire of absurdity."

The Interplay of Curiosity and Rigor:
Throughout this methodological odyssey, we welcomed the fusion of curiosity and rigor, embracing the unexpected discoveries that often arise when venturing into uncharted statistical territories, much like stumbling upon hidden treasures while navigating through a labyrinthine maze.

In conclusion, our methodological journey was marked by a harmonious blend of data-driven analysis and a hint of whimsy, underscoring our commitment to unraveling the enigmatic correlation between "Robbie on Fire" and the firefighting force of South Dakota. With this eclectic approach, we hope to ignite further scholarly discourse and kindle a spark of curiosity in the realm of statistical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in and The number of firefighters in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from The Movie DB and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2010 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8741312, r-squared of 0.7641053, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Robbie on Fire: Exploring the Correlation between Margot Robbie's Film Appearances and Firefighter Numbers in South Dakota"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the often-overlooked relationship between the cinematic presence of Margot Robbie and the labor force of firefighters in the state of South Dakota. By utilizing data from The Movie DB and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to uncover any potential correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8741312 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2010 to 2022. The implications of this surprising correlation prompt a closer examination of the interplay between cultural phenomena and labor trends, challenging conventional wisdom and encouraging a more holistic understanding of societal dynamics. With these results, we aim to ignite further discourse and exploration of unconventional factors that may influence labor dynamics, adding a spark of curiosity to the realm of statistical analysis.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of statistical analysis often uncovers unexpected and puzzling relationships, much like stumbling upon a lost sock in the dryer. Our study delves into the enigmatic correlation between the filmography of Margot Robbie and the number of firefighters in the state of South Dakota. While at first glance, these two variables may seem about as related as a pineapple and a bicycle, our research endeavors to untangle the web of connections that exist in the intricate fabric of societal dynamics.
Margot Robbie, a talented and versatile actress, has captured the hearts of many with her captivating performances in numerous films. Meanwhile, the dedicated men and women of the firefighting profession bravely protect and serve their communities. What, one may ponder, could possibly link the onscreen charisma of Margot Robbie with the valiant efforts of South Dakota's noble firefighters? It is indeed a mystery worthy of Sherlock Holmes' most astute scrutiny.
The state of South Dakota, known for its picturesque landscapes and the iconic Mount Rushmore, has also experienced fluctuations in its firefighting workforce over the years. Our research aims to shed light on the puzzling dynamics that underlie the vicissitudes in this particular labor sector and to explore whether Margot Robbie's escalating cinematic presence exerts any discernible influence.
Guided by the ever-curious spirit of scientific inquiry, we embarked on this whimsical yet serious venture, armed with the tools of data analysis and statistical rigor. Our findings promise to challenge preconceived notions and add a splash of intrigue to the often austere world of labor statistics. Join us on this whimsical journey as we unravel the mysteries of "Robbie on Fire," blending serious research with a sprinkle of whimsy. After all, in the grand theater of life, who's to say there isn't room for a little unexpected drama?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis conducted for the period 2010 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the number of movies in which Margot Robbie appeared and the number of firefighters in South Dakota. Specifically, a correlation coefficient of 0.8741312 and an r-squared value of 0.7641053 were obtained, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further attests to the statistical significance of this connection, providing empirical support for the unexpected correlation.

Our findings are visually encapsulated in Fig. 1, which illustrates the striking correlation between the cinematic presence of Margot Robbie and the labor force of firefighters in South Dakota. Though one might not have foreseen such a linkage, the scatterplot unequivocally conveys the compelling relationship between these seemingly disparate domains.

The implications of this correlation prompt a reevaluation of traditional assumptions regarding the deterministic factors that influence labor trends. While the initial surprise of this discovery may evoke a metaphorical double take akin to witnessing a magic trick, the robustness of the statistical results cannot be understated. This unexpected association fosters a deeper reflection on the intricate interplay between cultural phenomena and labor dynamics, challenging rigid paradigms and igniting the flames of curiosity within the realm of statistical analysis.

In conclusion, the investigation into the correlation between Margot Robbie's film appearances and firefighter numbers in South Dakota has uncovered a consequential relationship that invites further exploration and contemplation. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic connections that underlie societal dynamics, it becomes evident that the unexpected can sometimes hold the key to new insights and understanding. This unanticipated correlation between cultural symbolism and workforce trends serves as a reminder that statistical analysis, much like life itself, is rife with surprises and captivating discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in and The number of firefighters in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Robbie on Fire: Exploring the Correlation between Margot Robbie's Film Appearances and Firefighter Numbers in South Dakota"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the often-overlooked relationship between the cinematic presence of Margot Robbie and the labor force of firefighters in the state of South Dakota. By utilizing data from The Movie DB and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to uncover any potential correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8741312 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2010 to 2022. The implications of this surprising correlation prompt a closer examination of the interplay between cultural phenomena and labor trends, challenging conventional wisdom and encouraging a more holistic understanding of societal dynamics. With these results, we aim to ignite further discourse and exploration of unconventional factors that may influence labor dynamics, adding a spark of curiosity to the realm of statistical analysis.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Existing literature on the relationship between cultural phenomena and labor trends has primarily focused on more traditional indicators, such as economic policies, technological advancements, and demographic shifts. However, our investigation into the puzzling correlation between Margot Robbie's film appearances and the number of firefighters in South Dakota uncovers a lesser-explored dimension of this complex interplay.
In "Labor Economics" by George J. Borjas, the authors emphasize the significance of demographic factors and government policies in shaping labor dynamics. While this seminal work sheds light on conventional influencers, it remains silent on the potential impact of Hollywood stardom on the labor force. Similarly, Smith and Jones in "Economic Drivers of Labor Trends" explore the role of education and skills in workforce composition, providing valuable insights but overlooking the enchanting allure of the silver screen.
Turning to literary works that explore societal influences, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers a quirky investigation into unexpected correlations, sparking our own whimsical pursuit for unconventional connections. Meanwhile, in "Outliers: The Story of Success" by Malcolm Gladwell, the exploration of hidden patterns and outliers serves as a source of inspiration for our offbeat inquiry into the unexpected affinity between cinema and firefighting.
On a less serious note, works of fiction such as Ray Bradbury's "Fahrenheit 451" and Joseph Heller's "Catch-22" offer fictionalized portrayals of firefighting and military service, respectively, albeit in vastly different contexts. These literary departures, while not directly related to our study, demonstrate the diverse portrayals of occupations and offer a reminder of the unexpected twists that can arise when delving into societal dynamics.
Drawing inspiration from unexpected sources, our exploration also takes cues from board games like "Flash Point: Fire Rescue," serving as a reminder that unexpected fires can break out in the most unlikely of places – much like the unexpected correlation our study uncovers.
As we navigate the uncharted waters of correlation between Margot Robbie's cinematic presence and South Dakota's firefighting workforce, our study aims to infuse a dose of levity into the often-dry realm of labor statistics, combining scholarly rigor with a dash of humor and unexpected discovery.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis conducted for the period 2010 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the number of movies in which Margot Robbie appeared and the number of firefighters in South Dakota. Specifically, a correlation coefficient of 0.8741312 and an r-squared value of 0.7641053 were obtained, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further attests to the statistical significance of this connection, providing empirical support for the unexpected correlation.
Our findings are visually encapsulated in Fig. 1, which illustrates the striking correlation between the cinematic presence of Margot Robbie and the labor force of firefighters in South Dakota. Though one might not have foreseen such a linkage, the scatterplot unequivocally conveys the compelling relationship between these seemingly disparate domains.
The implications of this correlation prompt a reevaluation of traditional assumptions regarding the deterministic factors that influence labor trends. While the initial surprise of this discovery may evoke a metaphorical double take akin to witnessing a magic trick, the robustness of the statistical results cannot be understated. This unexpected association fosters a deeper reflection on the intricate interplay between cultural phenomena and labor dynamics, challenging rigid paradigms and igniting the flames of curiosity within the realm of statistical analysis.
In conclusion, the investigation into the correlation between Margot Robbie's film appearances and firefighter numbers in South Dakota has uncovered a consequential relationship that invites further exploration and contemplation. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic connections that underlie societal dynamics, it becomes evident that the unexpected can sometimes hold the key to new insights and understanding. This unanticipated correlation between cultural symbolism and workforce trends serves as a reminder that statistical analysis, much like life itself, is rife with surprises and captivating discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unexpected correlation between the number of movies featuring Margot Robbie and the number of firefighters in South Dakota is a poignant reminder that statistical analysis, much like the cinematic world itself, is brimming with surprises and unexpected connections. While some may initially dismiss this correlation as a mere statistical quirk, the robustness of our results calls for a more contemplative appraisal.

Building on the offbeat cues from literature and pop culture in our literature review, our findings lend empirical support to the idea that cultural phenomena can exert a tangible influence on labor dynamics – much like how a chef delicately balances flavors to create a harmonious dish. The quirky parallels drawn from fictional works and board games serve as a whimsical yet thought-provoking backdrop against which our study unveils a real-world correlation that is as captivating as a plot twist in a suspense thriller.

Some may quip about the surreal nature of this connection, postulating that perhaps the heat of the spotlight on Margot Robbie's career inadvertently sparks an increased interest in firefighting. Whether such musings hold merit or not, our findings certainly add a dash of excitement and intrigue to the realm of labor statistics, much like an unexpected plot twist that keeps viewers on the edge of their seats.

In line with the literature review's emphasis on the importance of unexpected correlations and outliers, our study serves as a testament to the tantalizing discoveries that can emerge when we venture off the beaten path of conventional hypotheses. Not unlike the unforeseen emergence of a mole in the whimsical game "Whac-A-Mole," our discovery of this connection challenges scholarly conventions and invites further exploration into the interplay between cinema, symbolism, and labor dynamics.

In conclusion, our research not only uncovers a compelling correlation but also enlivens the discourse on labor trends with an element of surprise and wonder. As we continue to peel back the layers of societal dynamics, it becomes increasingly evident that statistical analysis is no stranger to the delightful whims of chance and the unexpected allure of unconventional findings. This correlation between Margot Robbie's cinematic presence and the firefighting workforce in South Dakota, while unconventional, beckons us to embrace the unexpected and approach statistical inquiry with a spirit of open-minded curiosity and humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in and The number of firefighters in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Robbie on Fire: Exploring the Correlation between Margot Robbie's Film Appearances and Firefighter Numbers in South Dakota"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the often-overlooked relationship between the cinematic presence of Margot Robbie and the labor force of firefighters in the state of South Dakota. By utilizing data from The Movie DB and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to uncover any potential correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8741312 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2010 to 2022. The implications of this surprising correlation prompt a closer examination of the interplay between cultural phenomena and labor trends, challenging conventional wisdom and encouraging a more holistic understanding of societal dynamics. With these results, we aim to ignite further discourse and exploration of unconventional factors that may influence labor dynamics, adding a spark of curiosity to the realm of statistical analysis.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of statistical analysis often uncovers unexpected and puzzling relationships, much like stumbling upon a lost sock in the dryer. Our study delves into the enigmatic correlation between the filmography of Margot Robbie and the number of firefighters in the state of South Dakota. While at first glance, these two variables may seem about as related as a pineapple and a bicycle, our research endeavors to untangle the web of connections that exist in the intricate fabric of societal dynamics.
Margot Robbie, a talented and versatile actress, has captured the hearts of many with her captivating performances in numerous films. Meanwhile, the dedicated men and women of the firefighting profession bravely protect and serve their communities. What, one may ponder, could possibly link the onscreen charisma of Margot Robbie with the valiant efforts of South Dakota's noble firefighters? It is indeed a mystery worthy of Sherlock Holmes' most astute scrutiny.
The state of South Dakota, known for its picturesque landscapes and the iconic Mount Rushmore, has also experienced fluctuations in its firefighting workforce over the years. Our research aims to shed light on the puzzling dynamics that underlie the vicissitudes in this particular labor sector and to explore whether Margot Robbie's escalating cinematic presence exerts any discernible influence.
Guided by the ever-curious spirit of scientific inquiry, we embarked on this whimsical yet serious venture, armed with the tools of data analysis and statistical rigor. Our findings promise to challenge preconceived notions and add a splash of intrigue to the often austere world of labor statistics. Join us on this whimsical journey as we unravel the mysteries of "Robbie on Fire," blending serious research with a sprinkle of whimsy. After all, in the grand theater of life, who's to say there isn't room for a little unexpected drama?

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis conducted for the period 2010 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the number of movies in which Margot Robbie appeared and the number of firefighters in South Dakota. Specifically, a correlation coefficient of 0.8741312 and an r-squared value of 0.7641053 were obtained, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further attests to the statistical significance of this connection, providing empirical support for the unexpected correlation.
Our findings are visually encapsulated in Fig. 1, which illustrates the striking correlation between the cinematic presence of Margot Robbie and the labor force of firefighters in South Dakota. Though one might not have foreseen such a linkage, the scatterplot unequivocally conveys the compelling relationship between these seemingly disparate domains.
The implications of this correlation prompt a reevaluation of traditional assumptions regarding the deterministic factors that influence labor trends. While the initial surprise of this discovery may evoke a metaphorical double take akin to witnessing a magic trick, the robustness of the statistical results cannot be understated. This unexpected association fosters a deeper reflection on the intricate interplay between cultural phenomena and labor dynamics, challenging rigid paradigms and igniting the flames of curiosity within the realm of statistical analysis.
In conclusion, the investigation into the correlation between Margot Robbie's film appearances and firefighter numbers in South Dakota has uncovered a consequential relationship that invites further exploration and contemplation. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic connections that underlie societal dynamics, it becomes evident that the unexpected can sometimes hold the key to new insights and understanding. This unanticipated correlation between cultural symbolism and workforce trends serves as a reminder that statistical analysis, much like life itself, is rife with surprises and captivating discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our findings have illuminated a surprisingly strong positive correlation between the number of films featuring Margot Robbie and the count of firefighters in South Dakota. This unexpected association challenges preconceived notions and sparks contemplation regarding the intricate interplay between cultural phenomena and labor dynamics. It's as unexpected as finding a gluten-free vegan cupcake in a barbecue joint!

The robustness of the statistical results points to a connection that is more than just a mere flicker of correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.8741312 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 suggest a bonfire of a relationship that cannot be dismissed lightly. Like a well-executed plot twist in a mystery novel, these findings encourage a closer examination of seemingly unrelated variables and prompt the cultivation of a more holistic understanding of societal dynamics.

With these results, our research aims to stoke the flames of further discourse and investigation into the unconventional factors that may influence labor trends. However, it seems that for now, we've extinguished the need for any more research in this particular area. After all, sometimes the most fascinating discoveries are the ones we least expect. It's as if we've stumbled upon a nugget of wisdom in a comedy movie - unexpected, but undeniably intriguing.

It is our hope that this study will kindle a spark of curiosity within the realm of statistical analysis and compel researchers to explore more uncharted territories in the captivating world of correlations. As the flames of knowledge continue to burn bright, let us remember that in the vast and wondrous landscape of scientific inquiry, the most absurd connections may just hold the keys to unraveling the mysteries of our complex reality.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Robbie on Fire: Exploring the Correlation between Margot Robbie's Film Appearances and Firefighter Numbers in South Dakota. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Celestial Cinematic Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Robbie on Fire: Exploring the Correlation between Margot Robbie's Film Appearances and Firefighter Numbers in South Dakota. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Cinematic Phenomenon Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Robbie on Fire: Exploring the Correlation between Margot Robbie's Film Appearances and Firefighter Numbers in South Dakota with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the often-overlooked relationship between the cinematic presence of Margot Robbie and the labor force of firefighters in the state of South Dakota. By utilizing data from The Movie DB and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to uncover any potential correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8741312 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2010 to 2022. The implications of this surprising correlation prompt a closer examination of the interplay between cultural phenomena and labor trends, challenging conventional wisdom and encouraging a more holistic understanding of societal dynamics. With these results, we aim to ignite further discourse and exploration of unconventional factors that may influence labor dynamics, adding a spark of curiosity to the realm of statistical analysis.

ChatGPT:

Margot Robbie film appearances, firefighter numbers, South Dakota labor force, correlation, cinema impact on labor trends, Margot Robbie movie data analysis, cultural phenomena and labor dynamics, unconventional factors in labor trends, correlation coefficient analysis, statistical analysis societal dynamics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in
Source: The Movie DB
Additional Info: I.C.U. (2009); Z for Zachariah (2015); Terminal (2018); I, Tonya (2017); Birds of Prey (and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn) (2020); Barbie (2023); The Suicide Squad (2021); Neighbours 30th: The Stars Reunite (2015); Focus (2015); Whiskey Tango Foxtrot (2016); Goodbye Christopher Robin (2017); Dreamland (2019); Mary Queen of Scots (2018); Bombshell (2019); Amsterdam (2022); Babylon (2022); Peter Rabbit (2018); Suicide Squad (2016); Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood (2019); The Wolf of Wall Street (2013); A Panoramic Canvas Called 'Babylon' (2023); A Love Letter To Making Movies (2020); Vigilante (2008); The Legend of Tarzan (2016); Flopsy Turvy (2018); Larrikins (2018); Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway (2021); About Time (2013); The Wolf Pack (2014); Suite Française (2015); Slaughterhouse Rulez (2018); Merchant Ivory (2023); Joker: Put on a Happy Face (2020); Asteroid City (2023); The Big Short (2015)

See what else correlates with The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in

The number of firefighters in South Dakota
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of firefighters in South Dakota
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of firefighters in South Dakota

Correlation r = 0.8741312 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7641053 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 76.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of firefighters in South Dakota) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in) over the 13 years from 2010 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.3E-5. 0.0000933083419241538000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.0093% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 10,717 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.62, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in (Movie appearances)0002153263322
The number of firefighters in South Dakota (Firefighters)410420450500500550520480570530550440470




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0,0,0,2,1,5,3,2,6,3,3,2,2,])
array_2 = np.array([410,420,450,500,500,550,520,480,570,530,550,440,470,])
array_1_name = "The number of movies Margot Robbie appeared in"
array_2_name = "The number of firefighters in South Dakota"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 5846 · Black Variable ID: 26637 · Red Variable ID: 18612
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0